chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Milko Bobotsov vs Julius Kozma
Reggio Emilia (1966/67), Reggio Emilia ITA, rd 4, Dec-30
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense. Flohr-Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more M Bobotsov/J Kozma games
sac: 23.Qxc8+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-25-06  United33: so the endgame is 1R,1N,1B vs 1Q and then 1Q is not enough to win the game
Apr-25-06  euripides: <united> White wins more material - see the posts by <soberknight> and <eaglewing>.
Apr-25-06  stanleys: Rather easy one - I will give some suggestions for tomorrow's puzzle later
Apr-25-06  TheUnkraut: Alternative: Qxz9 followed by the knightfork on s10
Apr-25-06  WarmasterKron: Fairly simple. The queen sac leapt out at me, but the follow-up required more thought.

<euripides> 25.Rxd8+ is not possible as the knight is still in the way.

Apr-25-06  euripides: <warmaster> White has a rook on c8, so Rxd8+ looks legal to me. It is true that my line would not allow <eagle>'s elegant finish.
Apr-25-06  Summum Malum: Elegant finish..
Apr-25-06  ChessPieceFace: i just got through looking at yesterdays puzzle again, so when i clicked on this one, the answer practically jumped into my lap! hooray for my best week ever! :)
Apr-25-06  dakgootje: First move was obvious of course, but for some strange reason i had difficulties with finding Nc6 and calculating it all. Strange as i normally dont have such problems...
Apr-25-06  United33: <euripides> perhaps u can read my sentence carefully, my point is 1Q can't win vs 1N,1B,1R and that's why i conclude that black has no more hope to win.
Apr-25-06  euripides: <United> I don't know which line you're referring to. But if white plays correctly he ends up with more than the material balance you mention. According to <eagle> he ends up a rook and knight ahead.
Apr-25-06  EmperorAtahualpa: Nice puzzle, but the 24...Nd8 25.Nc6! part is somewhat tricker and makes this one of the tougher Tuesday puzzles!
Apr-25-06  WarmasterKron: <euripides> Yes, of course. I see it now but I was too busy focusing on the d1 rook.
Apr-25-06  Nostalgia: I saw Qxc8 and Rxc8 of course, but didn't see white's compensation after black blocked with the knight. Missed Nc6.

Glad so many of you found it extraordinarily simple, though. Guess I'm just a super-patzer.

-Joe

Apr-25-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: Dang. First time in a long while that I blew a Tuesday puzzle. I looked at 23. Qxc8+, and even figured that it was the *probable* solution, but I missed how effective the knight is at c6 at holding the attack together.
Apr-25-06  JustAFish: <Soberknight and Calculoso> Thanks. I was blinded by the check. I think it was Fischer (who inspired my Avatar name) who said "Patzer sees check, patzer gives check".
Apr-25-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: I,too goofed this one. I tried Qxc8+ only to run into the nonmate. I missed the lethal Nc6,which threatens mate and the queen. White either wins the queen,mates,or clears out the whoe back row!
Apr-25-06  jmelton: Got this one relatively fast, but it wasn't a beginner-level puzzle like yesterday's; about right for a Tuesday.

What I'm most interested in about this game is where Black went wrong and what he could have done better. Georgie Dubb suggests that the: <attempt to save a pawn with 9. ... Kf8 (instead of 9...bxc6 10.Qxc6+ Bd7 11.Qxd5 was an eyesore and finally led to disaster ...>.

But I don't think that's the problem -- if Black's only choice was to just give up the b7 pawn, then he's more or less lost anyway. Black's big mistake was 12...c5, inexplicably giving away the pawn he had just saved with Kf8 and, even worse, allowing White to open up all sorts of lines with Black's king still sitting on f8.

Black should have instead played something like 12...Bb7 13.Na4 Rb8 14.Rd1 h6 15.Be3 Ng5. If White takes on g5, Black's rook has the h-file and can also protect the c-pawn with Rh6. If instead White leaves the knight alone and goes for occupying c5 (e.g. 16.Nd2 Ne6 17.Nb3 Ba8 18.Nac5 Nxc5 19.Nxc5 Kg8), although White has an obvious positional advantage it doesn't look like Black is lost. Fritz evaluates the position after both of these example lines as a slight edge for White. Then again, Fritz is no Karpov when it comes to evaluating and playing closed positions.

Apr-25-06  En prise: I am new to this site and just added this game as my first in my favorite games collection. It is instructive in that it combines the exploitation of an opponentt's back rank weakness and in how to take advantage of the geometrical pattern of the knight in combination. See The Art of Chess Combination Part II Chapter II by Eugene Znosko-Borovsky.
Apr-25-06  dakgootje: <En prise> Welcome to the site! =)
Apr-25-06  Whitehat1963: Not very hard, but it did take me 30-45 seconds or so.
Apr-25-06  jperr75108: Not so hard, get the back rank idea petty quick. What comes after Qxc8 is a bit harder to see.
Apr-26-06  1instrument: it was easy to guess the sacrifice, i just don't see after 24. Rxc8+. Nc6 isn't doin it for me.

help please.

Apr-26-06  blingice: Probably 25. Nc6 and the knight on d8 has two more pieces bothering it, and in addition to that, the knight is also attacking the queen. Since black can't really manage all of that, resigning is clear.
Apr-26-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: White's 23. Qxc8+! initiates a winning decoy after 23...Bxc8 24. Rxc8+ with either 24...Bd8 25. Nxe6+! (removing the guard)or 24...Nd8 25. Nc6! (double attack).
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
64idi0t's flank_&_english_2
by 64idi0t
Milko Bobotsov (1931-)
from PLayer of the day:notable game II by nikolaas
23. Qxc8+!
from Decoy by patzer2
Gajendra's favorite games
by Gajendra
23.? (Tuesday, April 25)
from POTD English by takchess
zev22407's favorite games
by zev22407
23.? (Tuesday, April 25)
from Puzzle of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni
the back rank weakness.
from Combinations by zev22407
23.? (April 25, 2006)
from Tuesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
Chess Miniatures, Collection XVII
by PinkLedDoor
Back rank weakness
from En prise's favorite games by En prise
Chess Miniatures, Collection XVII
by wwall


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC