chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Johann Hjartarson vs Jesus Nogueiras
"What Would Jesus Do?" (game of the day Jun-11-2007)
Belfort World Cup (1988), Belfort FRA, rd 11, Jun-27
French Defense: Winawer. Poisoned Pawn Variation Main Line (C18)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more Hjartarson/J Nogueiras games
sac: 18...Bc2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-11-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <Eyal: It's winning for Black, but...he could have won the White queen by 32...Rxg3>, etc.

Good observation! I totally missed that.

Jun-11-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: Hjartarson was a world championship candidate around the time this game was played and won a candidates quarter-final match from a slightly-past-his-prime Korchnoi before losing to Karpov ... so it wasn't any patzer that Nogueiras so impressively defeated in this game.
Jun-11-07  sandmanbrig: Wow! 32...Rxf4+!! is amazing.
Jun-11-07  WarmasterKron: <What would Jesus do?>

Turn the other check?

Jun-11-07  Sredni Vashtar: <sandmanbrig: Wow! 32...Rxf4+ is amazing> Doesn't anyone read recent comments any more?

Rxf4 is an amazing blunder, that's what it is.

32...♖xg3!! is much more powerful -- see <Eyal>'s analysis

Jun-11-07  WarmasterKron: <Sredni> 32.Rxg3 certainly wins bigger, but since Rxf4 wins anyway, it's hardly a blunder. More an inaccuracy, as Eyal said.

Don't you read recent comments?

Jun-11-07  Sredni Vashtar: <WarmasterKron: <Sredni> 32.Rxg3 certainly wins bigger, but since Rxf4 wins anyway, it's hardly a blunder. More an inaccuracy, as Eyal said.>

The difference between two moves is equivalent to giving away a rook, perhaps more (R+K vs Q may have a fighting chance in some positions, K vs Q hardly ever). I call this a blunder, no matter what are the circumstances.

Where do you think I got a reference to <Eyal>? Of course I read comments before typing, *ALL* of them, and then re-check for recent additions before posting.

Obviously, I disagree with the <inaccuracy> designation, but even more so with calling an inaccuracy to be "amazing".

Jun-11-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  fm avari viraf: A superb, classical & scintillating game till the very end by Nogueiras.
Jun-11-07  WarmasterKron: Clearly R+N vs Q is better for the weaker side than N vs Q. Indeed, as you say, it may stand a fighting chance in certain positions (not this one, incidentally, which is rather relevant to the issue).

I agree that ...Rxf4, albeit spectacular, is hardly amazing (not worthy of !, let alone !!) but at the same time, hardly a blunder even if it is inferior to ...Rxg3. A slower, slightly messier win is not as good as a simple, quick win, but it's a win regardless.

Jun-11-07  Sredni Vashtar: <WarmasterKron> OK, I propose to agree to disagree on the distinction between the blunder and inaccuracy.

Other than that, I don't have any issues with your argument and certainly agree that no ! is deserved by Rxf4.

And I am not going to bicker about the distinction between "amazing" and "spectacular", either :-)

Jun-11-07  WarmasterKron: Very well, we'll agree to a draw. :)

As regards to amazing/spectacular, I use the latter to mean that it looks good, even if it actually isn't. ;)

Jun-11-07  Dr.Lecter: The game was a nice. The clearance sacrifice (18....Bc2) was a hard move to find. And his 32nd move was strong (though <Eyal>'s is even stronger)and finished the game and the attack very nicely
Jun-11-07  outplayer: I have played the winawer many times as black but this game is amazing.
Jun-12-07  MostlyAverageJoe: Interesting game, but appears to have a lot of mistakes.

First, regarding the controversy regarding the 32nd move: after putting the game in Hiarcs, the engine tells me that after 32. Qd3, black had quite a number of good choices.

The move played in the game, Rxf4, is only THE SIXTH BEST MOVE for the black.

Here are the lines, ordered from the best (the one proposed by <Eyal>) to the least advantageous, all analysis 18-ply:

32 ... Rxg4 <-12.22> 33. Qxc4 bxc4 34. Nxg3 Qc2 35. Kf3 Qxc3 36. Kf2 Qd4 37. Kf3 Qd5

32 ... Rg6 <-8.47 - only a computer could come up with this move, I think.> 33. Rxg6 fxg6 34. Nd4 Nd2 35. Qxd2 Qxd2 36. Nxe6 Qe2 ... <I spent extra time double-checking this line - it is valid!>

32 ... f5+ <-7.34> 33. exf6EP Rxg3 34. hxg3 Qg2 35. Qf3 Nd2 36. Ke3 Qxf3 37. Kxd2 Kd7

32 ... f6 <-7.34>, continues same as above, except normal exf6 instead of exf6EP.

32 ... Qf1 <-4.61> 33. Rg1 Rxg1 34. Nxg1 Qxg1 35. Kf3 a5 36. h3 Qh2 37. Kg4 Qg2

32 ... Rxf4 <-2.70> 33. Nxf4 Nd2 34. Qxd2 Qxd2 35. Rg7 Qc2 36. Nd3 Qxc3 37. Rxf7 Qxa3

Now, regarding the mistakes during the game (the number of ? assigned by Hiarcs, not me):

22. Bg3?? (-0.21) while Ng3 evaluates at +1.20

23. Rg3?? (-2.09), while Qd2 evaluates at -0.21

29. Ke3?? (-7.51), while Rg1 evaluates at -3.02

And a couple more later, but they don't matter much any more, with the black advantage hovering around -10. Also several minor inaccuracies elsewhere - none a big deal.

Jun-17-07  outsider: at that time, hjartarson was about number 12 in the world, nogueiras was somewhere about n40. 1987-88 were the peak of hjartarson's career, he wasn't such a bad blayer as it may look like from this game
Oct-17-07  sigi: In my database the game is annotated by Nogueiras/Seiro-Gonzalez and others. The comment after 30 ... Qf2 reads: "finis".

The rest of the game is in my oppinion just one of the two variations which Nogueiras/Seiro-Gonzalez gave to show that Black is winning indeed.

Jul-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Man you is a noggy.
Jan-04-09  LivBlockade: <MostlyAverageJoe: 22. Bg3?? (-0.21) while Ng3 evaluates at +1.20>

22. Ng3 was tested once in another very complex game:

A Volokitin vs Ganguly, 2007

Jan-04-09  Chessdreamer: The score is wrong. It should be...

[Event "Belfort"]
[Site "Belfort"]
[Date "1988.??.??"]
[Round "11"]
[White "Hjartarson, Johann"]
[Black "Nogueiras, Jesus"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C18"]

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 Ne7 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 c5 7.Qg4 Qc7 8.Qxg7 Rg8 9.Qxh7 cxd4 10.Ne2 Nbc6 11.f4 Bd7 12.Qd3 dxc3 13.Qxc3 Nf5 14.Rb1 0-0-0 15.Rg1 d4 16.Qd3 Na5 17.g4 Ba4 18.c3 Bc2 19.Qxc2 d3 20.Qa2 Qc5 21.Rg2 Ne3 22.Bxe3 Qxe3 23.Rg3 d2+ 24.Kd1 Qf2 25.Kc2 d1=Q+ 26.Rxd1 Rxd1 27.Kxd1 Qxf1+ 28.Kd2 b5 29.Ke3 Nc4+ 30.Ke4 Qf2 0-1.

Jan-04-09  YoungEd: What an exciting game! Looks like it could have been played over 100 years ago.
Jul-17-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  fm avari viraf: I like the pun 'What would Jesus do?' My answer 'Just crucified Hjartarson'.
Jul-17-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  juan31: que buen juego chico !!
May-14-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Oh, Jesus! A wonderful game by Nogueiras.
Mar-28-17  SpiritedReposte: So many good moves in this French defense.
Apr-04-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  OrangeTulip: For Hjartarson a hell of a Job, playing against Three
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Dont mess with Jesus!
from viv001's favorite games by viv001
Game 8
from World Cup Chess (Kavalek) by Qindarka
Chess Informant Best Games 3
by koinonia
Chess Informant Best Games 3
by Nimzophile
what would jesus do
from jibbo's favorite games by jibbo
A raging attack in the French Defense.
from Inspiring Games! by SpiritedReposte
Spectacular play...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 7 by kishchess
AbhinavAsthana's favorite games
by AbhinavAsthana
Traditonal Winawar
from S.O.G.7.'s Favourite Attacks by SniperOnG7
what would Jesus do? win,of course
from Favrozone by kevin86
Round Eleven, Game #85
from Belfort World Cup 1988 by suenteus po 147
fm avari viraf's favorite games
by fm avari viraf
French Winawer Poisoned Pawn Nd7 and Qc7
by cnoahsay
Jesus saves us
from outplayer's favorite games II by outplayer
13.Qxc3
from French Progressions French by fredthebear
Game 448
from # Chess Informant Best Games 401-500 by Qindarka
June 11: What Would Jesus Do?
from Game of the Day 2007 by Phony Benoni
13.Qxc3 Nf5 14.Rb1 O-O-O 15.Rg1 d4 16.Qd3 Na5 17.g4 Ba4 18.c3
from 97_C18/19_Winawer_Poisoned Pwn 8.Qxg7 Rg8 9.Qxh7 by whiteshark
chillosoph's favorite games
by chillosoph
Walking on the water
from Honza Cervenka's favorite games3 by Honza Cervenka
plus 9 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC