chessgames.com

Aron Nimzowitsch vs Jacob Gemzoe
Kopenhagen 1928  ·  Van't Kruijs Opening: General (A00)  ·  1/2-1/2
To move:
Last move:

Annotations by Aron Nimzowitsch.      [48 more games annotated by Nimzowitsch]

find similar games 574 more games of Nimzowitsch
PGN: download | view Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-03-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Octavia> As you said on the <CG> page, it looks like Nimzowitsch was taking liberties against a weaker opponent - hence the eccentric opening. But (reading between the lines of the horrible English translation of Chess Praxis - unfortunately I don't have the German original) I suspect the final position must have amused him.

Nimzo liked to 'checkmate' (or 'stalemate') enemy Queens: several of his games end with elaborate queen traps. Here, the biter is bitten - and his own Queen falls into a type of 'perpetual check'. Other people would just see it as an ordinary forced repetition, but Nimzo's original sense of humour enjoyed this kind of king/queen irony. But the irony and humour are lost in the translation of 'Praxis'.

As Ray Keene says in his book 'Aron Nimzowitsch: a Reappraisal', even the title of Praxis is bad. In German it's 'Die Praxis Meines Systems' which clearly echoes his masterpiece, My System. A better title/translation would be 'My System in Practice'.

Old as it is, the translation of My System by Philip Hereford catches the tone and humor well. But Chess Praxis misses the mark badly.

I also have some other Nimzo-related books. Keene's A Reappraisal, published in the 1970s and updated in the 90s, is excellent. Fred Reinfeld edited a collection of Nimzo games, with light notes, in the 1940s: it's called Hypermodern Chess. There's also a very good book (in Danish) by Bjorn Nielsen, called Nimzowitsch: Danmarks Skaklaerer. I got a 2nd-hand copy recently and am doing my best to translate it, very slowly.

This game is only featured in Chess Praxis, unfortunately.

Nov-03-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: After a highly eccentric opening, White eventually reaches a winning position. Instead of the dubious 28.f4? White would have won easily with 28.Qg3+

Nimzowitsch gives this amusing line: 28.Qg3+ Kh8 29.Qh4 Kg7 30.g4 Bf4? 31.g5 Nd5 32.Qh6+ Kh8 33.Ng6 mate.

Here, 30...Bf4? is a mistake, but Black actually has no satisfactory defence after 30.g4. If 30...fxg4 31.Nxg4 Nxg4 32.Rxe7+ is fatal. And 30.g4 Bf4 31.g5 Bxe5 32.Qh6+ Kh8 33.dxe5 is worse - the Bb2 gets to join in the mating attack on the long diagonal.

Interestingly, when Nimzowitsch played 1.e3 - Van't Kruijs Opening - it was usually accompanied with b3, Bb2 and f4. Nimzo himself called this the Dutch Attack, but it's now known as the Nimzo-Larsen attack.

His opening here with 2.c3 and 3.d4 - a Saragossa, or Reversed Slav - is pure provocation.

Dec-09-08  DoubleCheck: I dont understand how Nimzowitsch remarks (on blacks 21st and 22nd move)

<Blacks wastes the opportunity to get a solid position with 21...Bxe4 followed by 22...e6

...and once again 22...Bxe4 was better also!>

Unless my eyes are playing a trick on me, but I believe that e4 is VACANT?!

Dec-09-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <DoubleCheck> A typo. In both quotations it's <Bxf4>.

(as in 'Die Praxis Meines Systems')

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collection [what is this?]
Annotated games by Nimzovitsch
by macaoui


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies