chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Garry Kasparov vs Alexey Dreev
Russian Championship Superfinal (2004), Moscow RUS, rd 6, Nov-21
Semi-Slav Defense: Anti-Moscow Gambit (D44)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 16 times; par: 99 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Kasparov/Dreev games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-23-04  alexandrovm: about the "doubtless facts", you are right. I misunderstood your quote and I apologize. I also apologize because I didn't answered you yesterday, because I had other things to do. Anyhow, I always answer posts.
Nov-23-04  aragorn69: Fascinating analysis by Kasparov on a drawing line that leads to a picturesque stalemate on http://www.chesscafe.com/misha/rsf2... Seven

<First I missed clear win with 41.Ke4! instead of 41.Nf7? After that Black missed his chance: 43...Bd5! This leads to a true chess study; I couldn’t believe my eyes when I found it at the board.

Q: Did you indeed find it at the board? Not in the post-mortem analysis?

GK: Post-mortem?!? I told Dreev about 43...Bd5 immediately after the game was over. Look: 44.Nd7+ Kd6 45.Nf6 Kc5 46.Ne4+ (or 46.Bg4 c3! 47.bxc3 bxc3 48.Nxd5 cxd5 49.Kd3 d4 50.Bd1 Kd5 51.Bc2 Kc5 52.Bb3 Kb4 53.Bd1 Kc5=) 46...Bxe4 47.Kxe4 b3 48.Ke3 Kb4 49.Kd2 c3+! 50.bxc3+ Kxa4 51.Kc1 Ka3 52.Kb1 a4 53.Bd3 c5 54.Bc4 b2 55.Bf7 (55.Kc2 b1Q+!) 55...c4 56.Bxc4 stalemate. Incredible!>

Worth watching !! It seems that the GK is very competent at <Kasparov bashing> himself... :-)))

Nov-23-04  arielbekarov: <alexandrovm> It is great of you to apologize, but it was really not needed !! I was just wondering how I could be so misinterpreted. So, I was thinking :

"It's really difficult to communicate without seeing each other's faces. The expression in our eyes, on our mouth and holding of our body make it so much easier."

The naked words have an enormous impact, and therefore can it be a more correct discussion, because we are not influenced of beautiful eyes, a nice sounding and convincing voice, and name it all what can distract us. The words are there alone, but it makes it also more difficult.

I don't have a computer of my own, so I am reading this now 1.45 p.m. (French local time).

I was checking "doubtless" several times in order not to use a word that means the opposite to my intention. They were just closing, where I am writing, but while walking to my room, I was thinking more and more that this must be the reason. "Doubtless" can easily be misread as "doubtful". The eyes register one thing, but the brain transforms it to something else. Never mind, if it is one's mother tongue or not. The same procedure may happen, but less in one's native language. I have several funny stories about this, but don't worry, not now.

This is also interesting to observe while playing chess. One has a plan and sees a real good move according to it. The plan itself makes you partly blind, but as we all know, everything possible has to be taking into consideration. And we are checking and checking before the move. And here we go ! But, something went wrong ??

The move was not so good after all. The idea is still good, but the move destroid it all. That's why, I think that sometimes obvious "blunders" can tell that the player is a talented and imaginative one, but has to improve the checking of all possible dangers. Chess is a good school !

So, once again, thank you for your answers and greatness to admit a misunderstanding and I will certainly take your words seriously about how to present what I think is right or not. We have different opinions, Thank G-D,
and I am not supposed to sound like the one who possesses the overall correct answer how it should be. That would be awful !

Anyhow the chance/risk is less than microscopic.
All the best !
Ariel

Nov-23-04  arthurv: on move 52 why the bishop did not eat the knight? Maybe this way the game could end remise? Am I right?
Nov-23-04  Lawrence: <arthurv>, <Junior 8> shows that 52.....Bxd3+ would have given White an advantage of +4.02 whereas 52.....Ba4 gives White an adv. of "only" 2.12--at the moment. (7 min. search)
Nov-23-04  azedex: Thanks for your posting Aragorn69
If kasparov saw that OTB, well oh my god, love or hate him (and what chess player could possibly hate him!?)He is scarily amazing! Also ariel nice posts. (je te remercie.)
Nov-23-04  azedex: Btw. How do I get those red highlights in my posts. Sorry this is all new to me.
Nov-23-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Willem Wallekers: <red highlights>
Hold Shift, press "," before and "." after the test you want to highlight.
Nov-23-04  arthurv: So what we have seen here, is not merely a Kasparov plays a great game, but takes full advantage out of the little mistake from the opponent,as it happened more often this tournement. Sort of Karpov style in the old days.
Nov-23-04  alexandrovm: Ariel, I read your text carefully this time and came to the conclusion that you have an artistic soul, and I admire that in a person. Art in music, in chess, in politics, in philosophy, etc. Thanks for your words. If you have time sometime, drop me a line at "alexandrovm1@yahoo.com". best wishes
Alexandro
Nov-24-04  drukenknight: what's going on here? You cant leave him with the N. He will eat you alive. Looks like a bad endgame.
Nov-25-04  BadTemper: No wonder GK is undefeated. Terrible endgame play by Dreev.
Dec-08-04  zorro: In his interview on chessbase.com Kasparov says Dreev came up with a powerful novelty but failed to follow his idea, connected to q-side castling (according to Garry), whereupon White would have been on the struggling side. Since, as it seems, 15...Nd7 is the novelty, what is the follow up Kasparov is referring to, 18...0-0-0 instead of 18...Nxe5?
Dec-16-04  LIFE Master AJ: <zorro>
Good info.

<everyone>
Great game ... when it is finished, this will be my "Game Of The Month," for December, 2004.

Dec-17-04  zorro: <LMAJ> In fact, that was a question more than an info.
Dec-17-04  karlzen: <zorro>, if I remember correctly, 18...0-0-0 was Kasparov's preference. I don't know the merit of the move though.
Dec-20-04  LIFE Master AJ: My analysis indicates that 18...0-0-0; is probably bettter than the game ... but after Qe1!, White retains a fairly significant edge. ("+/")
Mar-01-05  ionnn: Today in the Karpov tournament Dreev played the same line in his game vs Bacrot. He improved his play by 18 ... 0-0-0!?. Bacrot replied by 19 Qe2, but after 19 ... c5! Dreev had a promising position. Bacrot managed to escape and the game was draw.
May-26-05  woodenbishop: Only Kasparov could pull this win off (especially against 6 pawns to his own 3).
May-26-05  johnshadows: the rumor is that Dreev was drunk.
May-26-05  woodenbishop: <johnshadows> No man who is intoxicated can come out in the end game with 6 pawns against the likes of Kasparov having only 3.
Jul-22-05  alexandrovm: Kasparov indeed likes complications. This game is a prove of it. And Dreev novelty surely is very interesting
Jul-21-06  Hesam7: Is the ending after 27. Bxd1:


click for larger view

really lost for Black? Or Kasparov simply outplayed Dreev in a difficult ending? Also it is interesting that Kasparov did not go for the following line:

31. Bxe6+ Kxe6 32. Nc5+ Ke5 33. Nxb7 Kd5 34. Kd2


click for larger view

Sep-13-07  watchthehit: wow amazing how he won that even though he was in a worse position and less pieces amazin
Jul-13-08  myschkin: A key match of the day was, without a doubt, Kasparov-Dreev. Dreev led the tournament together with Grischuk, but playing Black against Kasparov did not promise an easy life. And indeed, Garry restored his once-habitual confidence, quickly executing opening moves and quickly obtaining a threatening position. Dreev reacted with principled rook sacrifice, Kasparov had to return piece to avoid mate, and the players reached highly complicated position. White had extra exchange, but Black’s pieces were pointed at White King’s residence, and everything could explode not in his favor. It seems Dreev rushed with his 18...Nxe5, allowing Kasparov to simplify the position and transpose into an endgame evaluated as “probably a winning” by Jakovenko. Despite Black having formal material compensation for a piece, White had good winning chances. The only factor favored Black was that White had to be very careful not to allow exchanging all his remaining pawns (both of them, to be precise). Kasparov slipped with his time control move, allowing Dreev a miraculous save, which Alexey didn’t see. To find it one had to wholeheartedly believe in Black’s defensive resources... or to be Kasparov! Garry said he saw that problem-like continuation leading to stalemate, and he showed it to his opponent after the game. (http://www.chessbase.com/eventartic...)
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
The QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav
by Zhbugnoimt
an instant classic - kasparov proves why he was/is the best
from my favorite games by yoozum
An instant classic - Kasparov proves why he's the best
from GK Collection on the move to Fredthebear's den by fredthebear
B+N+P vs. B+3P
from Instructive chess endgames I by Jaredfchess
Garry Kasparov's Best Games
by brad1952
Dreev novelty
from Kasparov! by larrewl
maestro37's favorite games D43_D44 Anti Moskiews
by maestro37
paul grandi's favorite games
by paul grandi
Garry Kasparov's Best Games
by KingG
endgame
by themindset
Garry Kasparov's Best Games
by feifo
Anti-Moscow
from Semi-Slav by Hesam7
kaspy does a very nice and solid game here. Unclear til the en
from personal opawnion's favorite games by personal opawnion
Alexey Dreev ( 68 - 9 - 1 ) Moscow
from 3. Garry Kasparov [69-9-1] by IsmaelElzara
This game shows a classic attack lead into a brilliant endgame
from cpryob123's favorite attacking games by cpryob123
Skoosh's favorite games
by Skoosh
The QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav by Zhbugnoimt
by fredthebear
Semi Slav - Moscow
by yassenj
"Whither the Kasparov bashers now?" (2nd place, 25 points)
from 2004's Greatest Chess Games by iron maiden
Kasparov The Killer!!
by Zhbugnoimt
plus 21 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC