chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Louis Paulsen vs Siegbert Tarrasch
2-BSB Congress (1888), Nuremberg GER, rd 10, Aug-14
French Defense: Advance Variation. Milner-Barry Gambit (C02)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 23 times; par: 123 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more Paulsen/Tarrasch games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-28-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <One of the best games I ever played.> S. Tarrasch, "300 Chessgames"

To win Nuremburg 1888, and the prize of 500 mark, Tarrasch had to win this game. It is a classic and Nimzo analyzed the hell out of it. He discovered a tactical fallacy in Tarrasch conception, (Tarrasch thought that 15.Nc3 was not playable) and defeated Tarrasch in another classical game: Nimzowitsch vs Tarrasch, 1912

Aug-04-05  molle2006: A pretty stalemate trap in white's last move, but Tarrasch did the right thing.
Jun-08-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: <Gypsy>, see Kasparov's "My Great Predecessors" for new analysis on this 1912 game. Tarrasch had good chances for quite a long time, but missed by far the best moves.

It's instructive to see Tarrasch's own comments. A most notable one is stressng the importance of 6... cxd4, noting that 6... ♗d7 gives White a good game after 7. dxc5. Yet most notes to the famous game Nimzowitsch vs Salwe, 1911 claim that Nimzo was playing something revolutionary with that move.

Jun-08-09  chillowack: 1912? Isn't it 1888?
Jun-08-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: <chillowack> I was referring to the "classical game" cited by <Gypsy>
Oct-18-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Reminds me of this game

H E Atkins vs Capablanca, 1922

Feb-20-11  64rutor: Analysis from the book "My System", by Aron Nimzowitsch to the game Paulsen - Tarrasch:

15.Bxd7+?

(15.Nc3! Bxb5+ 16.Nxb5 Nc2 17.Rc1 Nce3+ 18.fxe3 Nxe3+ 19.Ke2 Nxd1 20.Rxc8+ Kd7 21.Rxh8 Nxb2 22.Rc1 White wins.)

18.Nxa7?

(Better 18.Qd3 Nxb5 19.axb5)

Feb-10-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  wwall: Instead of 26.Bxa5, perhaps 26.g4 first, then 26...Nh4+ 27.Nxh4 Bxh4 28.Bxa5.

Instead of 28.Bf4, perhaps 28.Bxb4 Rxb4 29.a5 Nxd4 30.Nxd4 Rxd4 31.Rb1 may draw.

Instead of 32.Ba3, perhaps 32.Be3 to hold the center pawn.

Instead of 35.Rb1, perhaps 35.a5 or 36.h3 and not allow Black to get his rook behind the pawn.

36.g5 may not be sound. Perhaps move the rook back with 36.Ra1 Rc4 37.Kg3, but White will lose the d-pawn.

After 36.g5, White was hoping for 36...h5 37.g6 fxg6 38.Ng5 Nxd4 39.Rd1 Rc4? 40.Rxd4 Rxd4 41.Nxe6+, winning for White.

Not 44...Nxd4? 45.Nc5, threatening 46.Nxb3, 46.Nxa6+, and 46.Rxd4.

Instead of 48...Rc8, Black could error with 48...Ke7 49.Rb7+ Kf8 50.Nc7 a4 51.Rb8+ Kg7?? (51...Ke7) 52.Ne8+ Kg6 53.h5+ Kh7 54.Nf6+ Kg7 55.Rg8 mate.

Instead of 51.Nb5, if 51.Kh5 Nf5 52.Nb5?? Rc4, threatening 53...Rxh4 mate.

Apr-01-12  bystander: After 19) Qd3 Qa6, Nimzowitch prefers the endgame for black. So why not avoid the endgame, e.g. 19) Kg2?
Apr-01-12  bystander: <wwall; Why not 26)g4, 28) Bb4x and 32) Be3?> Agreed!
Apr-01-12  bystander: I do not understand the purpose of 28)...h6? Why not 28)...Bc3, 29) Rd1 Rb4
Apr-01-12  Dr. Siggy: <bystander>: After 19. Kg2, Black would play 19... Qa6 and double his Rooks on the c-file with a strategically won game. Instead of 28... h6, Tarrasch himself would later recommend 28... Ra2, winning the a-pawn without danger as White's Rook couldn't break in along either the c- or the b-files.
Apr-01-12  bystander: <Dr.Siggy> Thanks for your comments. I read your profile with great interest. At the moment I am somewhere in the midle of Nimsowitch' "My system", may be the book of Tarrasch you recommend should be the next book to read.
Apr-12-14  john barleycorn: Nimzowitsch gives one of his "favourite combinations" after 11. Kf1:

11.... 0-0
12.g4 Nh6
13.Rg1 f6!
14.ef6 Rxf6
15.g5 Rxf3!
16.Bxf3Nf5
17.Rg4 Be8.

It is the white kingside weakened by Kf1 that has become the primary target no more the play against d4 as Tarrasch did with 11....Be7.

Apr-11-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <keypusher: Reminds me of this game H E Atkins vs Capablanca, 1922>

Also:

Tal vs Botvinnik, 1961

I'm sure Botvinnik was quite familiar with this game.

May-14-16  tigreton: Changing the bishop and the knight, White made no use of the strong point b5, as Nimzovitch later showed. It's interesting to see how Tarrasch didn't capture on d4 until the last moment, keeping there the most vulnerable pawn, which tied White's pieces to its defense, especially the knight on f3.
Sep-05-17  cwcarlson: 19.♕d3? ♕a6 ∓; 19.♔g2 ♕a6 20.g4 ♘h4 21.♘h4 ♗h4 22.♖e1=
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Formula7's favorite games
by Formula7
French Defense: Advance 6.cxd4. Milner-Barry Gambit (C02) 0-1
from FR ADV Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 10.
from Tarrasch's Best Games of Chess. Part I. by Dr. Siggy
CLUB Line (black): French (Advanced)
by lomez
Advance Variation. Milner-Barry Gambit
from All Time Greats Play the French w/Black & Win by JoseTigranTalFischer
23
from Veliki majstori saha 6 TARRASCH (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer
French Defense: Advance Variation. Milner-Barry Gambit
from FRENCH DEFENCE (Advance, Exchange, Schlechter,.. by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game 17
from My System (Nimzowitsch) by jgrob12
Classic Rook, Knight and Pawns ending
from French Expressions by BAJones
mi sistema de nimzovich
by LESTRADAR
Game 116
from Three Hundred Chess Games (Tarrasch) by Qindarka
Winning drawn games
by TheDestruktor
Game 1.
from Dynamic Chess - R. N. Coles by rudysanford
Game 266
from Master Games - Chess (Tartakower/du Mont) by Qindarka
Game 266
from Master Games - Chess (Tartakower/du Mont) by Jersey Joe
Game 17
from My System (Nimzowitsch) by isfsam
Game 116
from Three Hundred Chess Games (Tarrasch) by Incremental
Game 1 in Dynamic Chess by R. N. Coles
from Franco-Benoni Marshall Counterattacked FTB by fredthebear
Game 116
from Tarrasch's 300 Chess Games by yesthatwasasac
Game 266
from 500 Master Games of Chess by smarticecream
plus 10 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC