Gerard Welling vs R Kruithof (1980)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Gerard Welling vs R Kruithof
Corr NLD/H (1980), ?
Bird Opening: Dutch Variation. Batavo Gambit (A02) · 1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Given 18 times; par: 15 [what's this?]

explore this opening	find similar games	1,108 more games of G Welling
sac: 7.Qxg4+	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Nov-23-11		shivasuri4: 13....Kc7 was necessary.In the final position,black resigns because he has no way to both save the queen and prevent checkmate.

Nov-23-11		Gejewe: <shivasuri4> You are right. After 14.Nc3 White threatens 15.Nxe4+ and the King cannot move without suffering the loss of a queen so that leaves 14..Qxf4 (14..Qe7 15.Nb5+ Kd5 16.c4 mate) 15.d4 e3 ( 15..Qxc1+ and 16.Txc1 cxd4 loses due to 17.Nf7+) 16.Nc4+ Kc6 (Only move) 17.Bxe3! Qf6 (Only square, 17..Qc7 18.d5 mate and 17..Qxe3 18.Nxe3 cxd4 loses material after 19.Bf3+) 18.Ne5+ losing the queen next. As it was a correspondence game I sent this mainline 14.Nc3 "if .. etc." as a conditional black resigned as a result of 14.Nc3. I had been expecting your suggested 13..Kc7 intending 14.Nc3 as well, f.e. 14..Kd8 15.Nd5! winning. Better 14..Qd8 but 15.Be6 is not so easy to defend. After the logical 15..Qe8 then 16.Nd5+ Kd6 17.Nc4+ Kc6 18.Na5+ Kd6 19.Nxb7+ Kc6 20.Na5+ Kd6 21.Nc4+ (Back to the base) Kc6 22.Ne5+ Kd6 23.Bf7 gives white a promising enduring attack. At the time I believed that 11..e6! as played in a Swedish correspondence game Bryntse-�sterling (on move 9, no repetition there) is good and challenges White to show his compensation - and I still tend to that opinion 32 years later.

Nov-23-11		shivasuri4: Thanks for the detailed analysis!Congrats on playing a lovely game!Is the gambit sound,though?

Nov-29-11		Gejewe: <shivasuri4> This gambit is worth an occasional practical try, but I would not recommend to play it repeatedly. White clearly has some compensation, but it is a large material investment. However, 32 years ago I was reckless enough to try my luck in correspondence chess. As I wrote, 11..e6! is challenging. Besides the simple 5..e6 - instead of going for the queen - leads to a reversed Budapest gambit where I doubt that f4.. is a positive asset for white.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!

If you already have an account, you should login now.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
No personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No posting personal information of members.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.

Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)