|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 20 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Oct-08-05 | | mancha: this game is far more interesting then Anand-Topalov |
 |
Oct-08-05
 | | Sneaky: Wow! This looks like it's going to be the game of the day! And we switched channels just when the fireworks started. Somehow I imagine Svidler staring bug-eyed at that bishop on c3, going "homina homina homina" just like Ralph Kramden. |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | Double O Seven: Anybody have a Fritz evaluation for this game yet? |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | ongyj: <chessWizzy> but Topalov lost to noone in this tourney and Anand lost 2. How about that? |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | MTal: ChessWizzy, Anand will not even finish second. Not having guts (e.g., choosing to draw) does not qualify him. Plus, he was completely exposed and just fortunate in game 2. |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | HammerTime: I know Anand can move much faster than Topalov and that is why Anand was collecting data into his memory for final assault but then Anand thought, hey it could be a draw as well..and as you know topalov he never lost a game...but Anand will remain #2 in the world of chess. Its only my opinion.... |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | crazy monk: Bc4 certainly a brave move, deserves atleast !!? |
|
Oct-08-05
 | | WannaBe: <Sneaky: ... going "homina homina homina" just like Ralph Kramden.> LOL =) |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | theweirdo: black seems to have threats like QB5, Qa7, Nc6, Qxa3 |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | Per: < pavkata: taking the bishop is definitely risky...to me the choices are between Qb5 or Ngf5 or e5. Or Bishop top c1 looks solid too |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | The King Returns1: I thought Anand had some winning chances. His pawns in the middle were very nice. But, I guess he didn't see the win in sight, and settled for the draw. That's why I'm here, and he's there =). |
|
Oct-08-05
 | | TheAlchemist: Maybe Svidler's appetite will kick in, and he will eat the Bishop. |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | BaiKosta: FRITZ says +1.24 advantage for Svidler,however it is hard to defence in the proper way . |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | Resignation Trap: <TheAlchemist> Is it chocolate or licorice? |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | ChessLeader: What about N:e6, fe; B:d6, N:d6; e5!? |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | CAPA2422: Nxe6 Nxe6 e5 +.34
pretty even |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | Pawsome: <taking the bishop is definitely risky...to me the choices are between Qb5 or Ngf5 or e5> Correct, for example: 24. bc3 Ra3 25. Nb5 Ra2 26. Rd2 Rdw 27. Bd2 Bc4! 28. Qc4 Qa5 and wins. |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | The King Returns1: Svidler is now hoping that Kasim doesn't see the discovered attack on his queen after he plays e5. |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | notsodeepthought: <WannaBe: 25. Nxe6 Nxe6 26. e5 Qc8 +1.25>
<CAPA2422: Nxe6 Nxe6 e5 +.34>
That's what I like about computers - they've removed all uncertainty. |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | marco antonio: I thik Bxd6 NxB, e5 |
|
Oct-08-05
| | WannaBe: <notsodeepthought> Computers (noun) logical way for things to go wrong...
What you mean it crashed?! =) |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | Helloween: Taking the Bishop loses to Rxa3 followed by Ra2(so says Fritz). |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | crazy monk: <they've removed all uncertainty> but chess like life, is all uncertain. That is the beauty of it. |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | pavkata: e5 and black plays d5, and the e5 break didn't accomplish much |
|
| Oct-08-05 | | 12929011: e5 is the way to go, according to Fritz 8, though there seems to be a lot of anti-computer sentiment around here. |
|
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 20 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
