Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Eric Schiller vs Howery Pack
"April Fool's Mate" (game of the day Apr-01-2008)
Port Washington (skittles) (1969), Port Washington, WI USA
King Pawn Game: Parham Attack (C20)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 725 more games of E Schiller
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Eric Schiller: ... bu never became a rated player.>

Yes he did! Bu Xiangzhi

Oct-09-11  Oceanlake: This game was played complete in a WW II game: Tojo versus Hitler (different names). Tojo took the e5 pawn and announced mate. With scorn, Hitler moved Ke7xe5 and pointed out that he would never allow a female such a privilege. Tojo resigned.
Oct-09-11  Rook e2: 2.Qh5,Schiller: hey Howery Pack, I put a coin under your king! Howery: where? Schiller: touch-move!
Oct-09-11  Oceanlake: P. L. Rothenberg penned the story for the December 1941 Chess Review.
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Howery Pack evidently works for the Dallas Morning News.
Jan-31-12  rogl: I have actually played this game: 1.g4 e5 2.f3 ♕h4#. To make things clear: I was black.
Feb-17-12  Nemesistic: A 3 move chess game in this sites DB !!!

I'll learn more from Gizmo's efforts, i think i may upload one of mine for him to chew on, the bearded rascal lol

Seriously though, what purpose does this game serve being here, forgetting the name of one of the players involved!

Apr-02-12  rrrttt: Hey look your king has a magnet on it!
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Cf. L Palau vs S Kalabar, 1927.
Oct-09-12  Abdel Irada: <rogl: I have actually played this game: 1.g4 e5 2.f3 h4#. To make things clear: I was black.>

I think all of us have been on the black side of that game at least once.

But, although statistically some of us must also have been on the white side, I doubt we'll see anyone admit it.

Oct-09-12  JohnBoy: <Once: ...he accidentally touches his Bc1 instead...if you touched a piece that cannot move you must instead play a move with your king.> I once was reaching for a piece when my sleeve hit another piece and knocked it over. Both my opponent and I were 1500 newbs and I consented, moving the "touched" piece and promptly lost major material.

Next time (if there is such) I will pull a Kasparov. The point of the rule is, of course, touch with intent.

Oct-09-12  Abdel Irada: Apropos of touch-move, this reminds me of an incident when I was in high school. We were playing qualifier matches to select members for our team for an upcoming interscholastic tournament, and I was two moves from mating one of my opponents when he complained that, ten moves before, I'd touched my rook before my king when castling.

There was no faculty advisor on hand, so the matter was left to the club officers to decide. Unfortunately, none of them really understood the rules applying to this sort of situation, so they ultimately forced me to back up ten moves and move my rook instead of castling. This changed the position just enough that my opponent escaped with a perpetual check.

As it turned out, it didn't matter. My results were still good enough that I made the team. As for how I played on that team ... let's just say that it's not a good idea to play too many blitz games between rounds.

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: As I understand it, in Lindemann-Echtermayer White didn't just bump the bishop by accident. He actually played 3.Bc3.

<Adbel Irada> Surely there is a "statute of limitations" for touch-move claims. You shouldn't get to see how the game develops and, if it develops badly for you, claim "touch-move" a zillion years after the fact.

May-27-13  Abdel Irada: <<Adbel Irada> Surely there is a "statute of limitations" for touch-move claims. You shouldn't get to see how the game develops and, if it develops badly for you, claim "touch-move" a zillion years after the fact.>

To be sure there is: I think one has to claim a touch-move violation before making a move in reply. But I didn't know that at the time, or at any rate couldn't prove it.

(Also, I believe that touching rook before king in castling is permitted. In an excess of caution, however, I have always been sure since that incident to touch the king first.)

May-27-13  Abdel Irada: Black's idea was logical, if a tempo too slow.

The king *almost* defends the e-pawn. ;-)

Aug-06-13  GumboGambit: According to Rybka, things started going downhill for Black with Ke7.
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <But, although statistically some of us must also have been on the white side, I doubt we'll see anyone admit it.>

Didn't some of the world champs (Tal? Petrosian?) admit to have lost his very first game by Fool's Mate? Which is quite a distinguishment, as most beginners record their first mating loss to the other short mate, the Scholar's one.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <alexmagnus>: Believe Tal mentioned in an interview that he came to an end in his very first game by Scholar's Mate.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: I got mated in six moves in my first game for my school team - a version of Scholar's Mate, as I recall. I only scraped back onto the team for the next match because somebody was ill -- but I won it, and won all my other games, and was top board by the end of the season. Maybe I should've quit while I was (just one) behind.
Oct-20-13  kramputz: Waste of space
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Bronstein remarks, "The most pleasant variation of the Queen's Attack for White is as follows: 2.Q-R5 K-K2 3.QxKP mate." <200 Open Games>, p. 1.
Mar-07-17  paavoh: <I have actually played this game: 1.g4 e5 2.f3 ♕h4#. To make things clear: I was black.>

I was also on the winning side in a high school casual game. My opponent was always eager to attack and he opened with 1.f4. I replied meekly with 1.- e6. He exclaimed "More attack!" and played 2.g4. I played 2.-Qh4 and said "I agree!"

Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: A beautiful and profound game.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Count Wedgemore: <Richard Taylor: A beautiful and profound game.>

Yes, the courage shown by the black king is an inspiration to us all. Bravely, he steps up in front of all his subjects and in sheer defiance dares the white queen: "-you can take me, but spare my men!" Beautiful and profound.

Nov-07-18  Saniyat24: Let's play another round...I was just joking...sorry to say I have not embarrassed myself like this. I hate it when people play Sicilian Bowlder attack against me as White..not a fan of moving the queen in your first or second move, come on people I know how to play chess, you can't mate me with your Queen and Bishop...think that is Scholar's mate. Why am I writing this here? surely I will not turn into another Chris Owen...ah well...Aristotle said, There is no genius without a mixture of madness...<Richard Taylor> is to blame for my post...his comment is a <Phony Benoni>
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Blunder 1
from Caturanga's favorite games by Caturanga
from Checkmate miniatures Compiled by Kasputin by fredthebear
2. Ke7????
from Quick checkmates by D.Observer
The Qxe5+ trap
from Ouch! by t3hPolak
from Some of the Funniest Chess Games Ever by shinelikeastar
Mate rapidíssimo 2
from Partidas de Xadrez by adalav
Parham Attack
from Favorite games by KFitzgerald
The only game I ever memorized....(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 3 by xajik
Just because I like these games doesnt mean that
by xeroxmachine
flotson's favorite games
by flotson
by Hengo
alex97's favorite games
by alex97
Parham Attack
from marwanredman123's favorite games 4 by marwanredman123
The only game I ever memorized....(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 3 by kishchess
Bad on both levels.
from RTC, CNAN by fredthebear
from What the?! by just a kid
fool me once-shame on u;fool me twice-er,u can't fool me again.
from pun city by kevin86
Hilarious games
by gazzawhite
Memorized games
by Brettwith2ts

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC