chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
John Lindsay McCutcheon vs Emanuel Lasker
corr (1903), rd 2
French Defense: McCutcheon. Bernstein Variation (C12)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more McCutcheon/Lasker game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "C12"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
    [help]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Morning: So McCutcheon played three games in which his variation was the opening against two world champions who combined held the title for over half a century. Though not official match or tournament games, he couldn't have complained too much about the results. McCutcheon won two of them. However, I wonder how he felt when he won as *White* vs. Lasker--and vs. his own variation.
Jun-10-06  ughaibu: I expect the opening was by arrangement, Lasker isn't known for correspondence play.
Mar-07-13  Garech: Lasker should have known better than to play the McCutcheon against McCutcheon!

-Garech

Mar-07-13  thomastonk: <Garech> McCutcheon paid Lasker for two corr games with his variation.

Lasker didn't played this game well. After the game he wrote to McCutcheon: "I butchered Black's chances! Black should get a good game out of the opening." This quote is taken from "French: MacCutcheon and Advanced Lines", Batsford 1979 by Tim Harding, who gives 13.. ♕e7? and 15.. ♘xg3?!, and noted that Lasker claimed that 15.. g4 might have led to a draw. Modern silicon friends offer a different view, but that's another story.

Having been a corr player for decades, I would like to note that quite often over-the-board GMs play weak corr games.

Mar-07-13  thomastonk: Keeping in mind that this has been a corr game, it is poorly played from both sides. After the exchange of queens, White is clearly winning, but with 24.Nd4? he loses a lot of his advantage. Much better seems 24.Nf4.

And then the final position:


click for larger view

Black's king is more active than White's, and the same is true for Black's rook. Is White's extra pawn still winning or is the position already a draw? I suggest 36.. a5, and I guess that Black can hold.

Mar-09-13  thomastonk: Meanwhile I have found more of Lasker's comments. With move 19, Lasker announced to be satisfied with a draw. And then the final comment: "I resign. I see no prospect for my King except slow retreat, which can only end beyond the edge of the board."
Nov-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: One of two correspondence games to test the McCutcheon Defense.

Played in 1904.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
IPC against Lasker!! (c2/c3/c5)
from 56_IPC = Irish Pawn Centre/middlegame-structure by Jaredfchess
IPC against Lasker!! (c2/c3/c5)
from 56_IPC = Irish Pawn Centre/middlegame-structure by whiteshark
French McCutcheon
by Buckle1851


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC