chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Evgeny Bareev vs Alexander Morozevich
Russian Championship Superfinal (2005), Moscow RUS, rd 7, Dec-26
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical. Berlin Variation (E38)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 21 more Bareev/Morozevich games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-26-05  csmath: 11. ... e5?

Moro cannot stand passive play, that is why we like him. Seeing this move live I thought this is OK only black is taking a serious commitment creating pawn weaknesses. However here Bareev demostrates immediately this move was a grave positional error and a lot worse than just a bad pawn structure!

12. Nd5! ... Nxd5

(anything else and black ends with passive defence)

13. cxd5 ... exf4

14. dxc6 ... fxg3

15. hxg3 ... Qc6?

grave error but black position is bad already, everything a consequence of that 11th move.

16. b4!

It is hard to believe but black is already lost!

I do not remember a recent game where a master player like Morozevich would be lost after 16 move, that is the case here. Unbelievable. Moro did continue useless fight for another 17 moves, at the end quite humorous.

Dec-26-05  Hidden Skillz: mtel masters vishy vs kramnik.. not exactly 16 moves but a move later
Dec-26-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ron: Wow. It does seem that after Black's 11th move his game is going downhill. After move 11 it seems that Bareev played perfectly.
Dec-26-05  aw1988: Right, Anand-Kramnik comes to mind, as well as Kramnik-Topalov (the latter from Corus).
Dec-26-05  bob000: brilliant win by Bareev
Dec-26-05  menacing knights: bareev devastated morozevich!
Dec-26-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: Awesome game by Bareev.
Dec-26-05  Akavall: Bareev did play a great game, but Morozevich played awful! This game reminds me of Kramnik vs Leko, 2004

I am not sure if Bareev saw everything over the board though, like Leko did. It is possible that Morozevich simply walked into at home preparation.

Dec-27-05  sucaba: I think the move 11. _ e5 was not that bad.
Black could play 13. _ ♘b4. After 14. ♕a4+ ♕d7 15. ♕xd7+ ♗xd7 or 14. ♕c4 exf4 15. ♕xb4 fxg3 I don't see why Black should lose.
Dec-27-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: 33. Qg5+ would make a good Monday puzzle.
32. Rh4 would make a good Tuesday puzzle.
31. Qh6+ would make a good Wednesday puzzle.
30. Qg5+ would make a good Thursday puzzle.
29. Rxb8 would make a good Friday puzzle.
28. Rxb7 would make a good Saturday puzzle.
27. Qh4+ would make a good Sunday puzzle.

So what day was it when white played 25. Bc6+ ?

Dec-27-05  Akavall: <al wazir> Tuesday.
Dec-27-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: Actually, 12/26 was a Monday.
Dec-27-05  Akavall: See, 26 was a Monday, 25 would be Tuesday ;). At least that's what I was thinking(to continue the pattern). Yeah, they did play on a Monday, and that also explains why Morozevich played so bad!
Dec-28-05  sucaba: On Sunday Bareev could play ♖xb7+ first.
I believe the toughest resistance would lead to a #12. For example 27. _ ♖xb7 28. ♕g5+ ♔f8 29. ♕xd8+ ♔g7 30. ♕g5+ ♔f8 31. ♖h4 ♖b1+ 32. ♔h2 ♖h1+ 33. ♔xh1 ♗d4 34. ♕d8+ ♔g7 35. ♕h8+ ♔g6 36. ♕( or ♖)h6+ ♔f5 37. g4+ (or ♗e4+ or ♖h5+) ♔e5 38. f4#.
Dec-28-05  syracrophy: After 25.Bc6+!! there are other ways also losing:

a)25...bxc6 26.Rxb8 Qxb8 27.Qg8+ winning the queen

b)25...Bd7 26.Re4+ Kf8 27.Qh6+ Kg8 28.Rh4! and there are no satisfactory defense to the threats: 29.Qh8++ or 29.Be4 or even 29.Rxb7 winning

If instead of 31...Kg8, black plays 31...Kf7 32.Qg5+! Kf8 (32...f6 loses to 33.Qg7+ Kd8 34.Rh4!! and there's no satisfactory defense against 35.Rh8+ and 35.Qf8+) 33.Rh4! and the threat 34.Rh8+ decides the game

After 33.Qg5+:

a)33...Qg7 34.Qd8+ Qf8 35.Rh8+! winning

b)33...Kf8 34.Qd8+ Kg7 35.Qh8+ Kg6 36.Qh6+ Kf5 37.Rh5+ Kg4 38.Bf3++

Dec-29-05  mrbasso: <know-it-alls> It is easy to start engines and criticize, but would be much tougher to actually be in the situation. 10.Rc1 is a novelty.
Previously 10.0-0 e5 11.Bd2 Be6 was played.
Khalifman vs D Bocharov, 2005

However now 10.Rc1 e5 11.Bd2 Be6 is bad since Qeen c2 is protected and 12.Nd5! is possible. Moro couldn't find a satisfactory solution over the board. Black seems worse if he doesn't play e5 in this line.

Dec-30-05  ajile: Great game by Bareev. He tempoed Moro into a hopelessly lost game. Agreed 11..e5 was the move that started his problems. Then after 16. b4! the game broke open for White.
Mar-25-06  Whitehat1963: This great game serves as a great primer on the use of the skewer as a tactic. (Player of the Day)
Oct-06-09  Jack Sparrow: simply brilliant.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Instructive in classical response to Nimzo; 11...e5?
from Useful games for openings by Frankly
zeus888's favorite games
by zeus888
Russian Championship 2005, Moscow
from # Greatest Tournaments 2005 by Qindarka
AdrianP's Bookmarked Games (2005)
by AdrianP
Bareev Gem
from Nice games and Masterpieces by Queens Gambit
ultra chess
by test 10
Gottschalk's favorite games
by Gottschalk


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC