Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Savielly Tartakower vs Leon Szwarcman
Paris (1929), Paris FRA, rd 4, Jun-??
Scotch Game: Classical Variation (C45)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 1,344 more games of Tartakower
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-20-12  YoungEd: Tartakower was a great endgame player; Black made a mistake in trading down to a slightly inferior endgame by move 13!
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: Didn't Black too easily allow White a passed h-pawn? If e.g. 23...Ke6 24. Rh5 Re7, it seems a lot harder for White to prove a win.
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <beatgiant>Didn't Black too easily allow White a passed h-pawn? If e.g. 23...♔e6 24. ♖h5 ♖e7, it seems a lot harder for White to prove a win.

I think that if Schwarzmann defended the h-pawn as you said, Tartakower would have shifted his attention to the other weakness in the Black position - the f6 pawn.

So 24...♖e7 25. ♔e4 ♔f7+ 26. ♔f5 and Black loses a pawn, or 24...♖e7 25. ♖g7 26. f5+ ♔f7 27. ♔g3, followed by g4.

Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <GrahamClayton>
Agreed, Black must not allow White's king to reach f5, or his own king to be driven back to f7.

Maybe a better defense is 23...c6 24. Rh5 Re7, preventing White's Ke4. Then if 25. g4 Kd6 26. h4 Ke5. It doesn't look that easy to attack the f6 pawn.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Mating Net: This game was as good as over by move 12. Black's 10...f6 guaranteed that he would have too many weaknesses to defend. Tartakower didn't have to break a sweat to secure the point.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 99
from My Best Games of Chess, 1905-1954 by Tartakower by suenteus po 147
I/90 - It's so Simple
from My Best Games of Chess, 1905-1954 by Tartakower by Chessdreamer
Game 90
from My Best Games of Chess (Tartakower) by Qindarka

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC