chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Mikhail Botvinnik vs Viacheslav Ragozin
Training Game (1936), ??
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical. Zurich Variation (E33)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 66 more Botvinnik/Ragozin games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  refutor: two things

one, i can't see this game (because of the pgn 12. O-OO-O)

two, i don't understand ragozin's play at all. was there an idea behind 15. ...Ne4?? or was it just an oversight

Sep-09-07  Maynard5: This game is almost a test case in how White should play against the Ragozin system in the Queen's Gambit Declined (which is arrived at here by transposition). Black's idea with ... Nc6 is to achieve rapid development, and open the center, generally with ... e5. Botvinnik had himself used this approach successfully, for instance in a well-known victory over Kotov in 1936. However, here White establishes a solid pawn formation in the center, and deploys his rooks on the half-open b-file and c-file, applying pressure against Black's backward pawns. A positional win for White would have been the justified outcome of this game. Unfortunately, Black simply blunders a piece. The opening of this game is theoretically significant, even if the rest of the game is catastrophic.
Aug-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Knight13: <i don't understand ragozin's play at all> Me neither. 11...Bh3?! was more of a show-off move which does absolutely nothing. Taking the bishop on d3 was more ideal.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collection [what is this?]
1d410's favorite games
by 1d410


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC