chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Judit Polgar vs Garry Kasparov
Lichthof Chess Champions (2006), Zurich SUI, rd 2, Aug-22
Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation. English Attack (B80)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 31 times; par: 37 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 16 more Judit Polgar/Kasparov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-30-06  yudhimaster: theres no way she could beat kasparov!!
Sep-30-06  positionalbrilliancy: <yudhimaster> Judit Polgar vs Kasparov, 2002 hmmm....Although she still is has a record of -10 against Kasparov.
Sep-30-06  babywizard: I don't know why all these harsh comments on Judit. Maybe it's because most of the kibitzers here does not know enough about this opening to make a decent comment. Sacrificing a knight for those 2 black pawns in this line of the Najdorf is not unknown. It's just that it was the first time that it had occurred in this that position, that's all. It usually comes in the line

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 e6 7. f3 b5 8. Qd2 Nbd7 9. g4 Nb6 10. 0-0-0 Bb7 and now 11. Ncxb5 is theory. Theory then contines with 11...axb5 12. Bxb5+ Nfd7 13. Qb4 Nc8 14. Nc6 Bxc6 15. Bxc6 Rxa2 16. Qb7 Ne7 17. Kb1 Nxc6 18. Kxa2 Nce5 and the position is around equal, according to Rybka.

Dec-20-06  sharpnova: Chess died for me when Kasparov left. Now I have no interest in the GM tournaments and matches. After Kramnik cheating with a computer and other bullcrap going on with corruption in FIDE. Kasparov was the glue that held it all together.

I focus on my own game now and trying to instruct the more ignorant of chessgames.com the errors of their analysis and opinions.

Dec-20-06  whatthefat: <sharpnova: Chess died for me when Kasparov left. Now I have no interest in the GM tournaments and matches. After Kramnik cheating with a computer and other bullcrap going on with corruption in FIDE. Kasparov was the glue that held it all together.>

Then go away.

Feb-14-07  Anyi: Hi! I'm new to this site and have just been enjoying this game to learn for my Sicilian game with black. What about 16.e5 instead 16.f4? It's a sacrifice for opening the bishop's way to h7 or otherwise for making life difficult for the knight in the back row. It's just a wilde guess...Best,A
Apr-11-07  Davolni: I thought he didn't play any official games after his retirement...?????
Apr-11-07  Archives: <I thought he didn't play any official games after his retirement...?????>

This was a rapid game

Apr-11-07  Davolni: Yeah I figured out, thanks.
12 games played among with Korchnoi, Karpov, and Polgar. Interesting tournament.:)
Sep-20-07  smarterthanbobby: funny how K- makes polgar look like
a 2400 level player... this wasn't even close... and I agree with 99% of this response that has been posted....
the 100 points she gave away somehow
seems odd, meaning 29 moves? giving up
2 files, and a major piece to boot...
I don't know... odd... should have been close, sure other 2700 ranked players gave bettere fights than this... but his is impressive... his wins never seem cheap... that's one thing everyone can love about his game. never cheap wins... he crushes people...
Sep-24-07  duplex: Judith is and was no match for Kasparov. The overall score of 11-1 doesn't need a comment.It must have been boring for Garry.There is a limit where women can go and Judith has already reached this limit.She is nowhere near the talent of Karpov,Kasparov or Fischer,not a country mile.
Sep-24-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: <There is a limit where women can go>

?!? Where is the limit? Is it a glass ceiling? I thought we had moved beyond this sort of crap.

Sep-24-07  smarterthanbobby: duplex...great comments...
11-1 I AGREE 100% and to OTHER COMMENTS....
sorry if THE GLASS CEILING upset you... I mean that... but THERE IS AN UNBREAKABLE glass ceiling IN THAT THOUGHT...

We are talking about THE EARTH
VRS GARRY k... AND He is 1# THE BEST
and done so for A LONG TIME... It's
monumental if someone IS ONTOP OF THE CHESS WORLD FOR EVEN A YEAR... the training put into it, the brillance, the torture one would have to put themselves through... sorry but there just hasn't been anyone to PROVE- AND I MEAN PROVE DULEX the slightest
bit wrong... CHEERS ENJOY! watch garry
and take notes... study... I do...

- ALSO noted... some could argue that he if continued would be 2900? and seeing how he crushes 2600 level
players... I could assume that it's like the Fujita Tornado Damage Scale imagine an F7.., that's what garry is to 2600 level players... ohh well would still love to see

Garry Kasparov AND BOBBY FISHER

race to 10 draws don't count...

I think FISHER WOULD crush HIM 7-3
WITH most of KASPAROVS wins being when fisher played black...

Oct-01-07  duplex: <<Garry Kasparov AND BOBBY FISHER

race to 10 draws don't count...

I think FISHER WOULD crush HIM 7-3
WITH most of KASPAROVS wins being when fisher played black<<

You can only speculate on that..Fischer in 1972 against Kasparov in 1990 There is a generation between the two ..Nobody could predict the outcome..Lets say 50:50 Or Karpov in his peak in 1980-81 against the both?? Nobody in the world could beat Anatoli Karpov easily in 1980-81. I could not see a clear winner or favorite..Only speculations..Depends on whose style you like most.. In my opinion all tree players in their peak should be considered equally strong..

Oct-01-07  euripides: <anyi> 16.e5 is not a bad idea and I imagine both players would have looked at it. I think Black can calmly reply 16...dxe5 when 17.Ba6 Ra8 looks OK for BLack e.g. 18.Bxb6 Qxb6 or 18.Rxd7 Nxd7. If Black is worried about the b1-h7 diagonal he can return the pawn with e4 before castling.
Oct-01-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  beenthere240: Anand did pretty well with f3 against the Najdorf in Mexico. Playing a sac like that against the world's top player is just stupid. She would have done better by "threatening to draw."
Jul-13-08  capin: A dumb game from J. Polgar. After 13. Nxb5 a child can win the game.
Mar-14-09  Kasparov Fan01: <Garry Kasparov AND BOBBY FISHER

race to 10 draws don't count...

I think FISHER WOULD crush HIM 7-3
WITH most of KASPAROVS wins being when fisher played black<<

Kasparov is way too strong to have been crushed by Fischer, the guy was above 2800 most of the last 15 years. Probably would have been 50:50, but I would give the slight edge to Garry, he's a little more dynamic and versatile, especially in the openings.

Mar-19-09  aazqua: Wow. This is another manhandling. Someone needs to tell Judit that you don't bring a knife to a gun fight. She's supposed to be a pretty good attacking player but she was way out of her league on this one.
Mar-19-09  AnalyzeThis: Is there a reason why there is so much interest in a blitz game?
Mar-19-09  KingG: I wonder how many pages of kibitzing we would have on a published Fischer blitz game from the period after he retired?
Jun-30-09  fierychess: A fine win again by Kaspa in his favorite Sicilian Najdorf!!!
Oct-02-09  duplex: There are 2 players in the history against whom one should always avoid playing Najdorf version of Sizilian. FISCHER AND KASPAROV..
Aug-25-12  masoudsad: I think it's so crazy to castle queen side against kasparov when he plays sicilian defence. Kasparov easily crushes such chess players.
Dec-03-12  Conrad93: The pawn march was just stupid.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
SD32
from ANIL RAJ.R's KING PAWN GAMES by ANIL RAJ.R
Sicilian Scheveningen. English Attack (B80) 0-1 Fearless N!!
from Favorite Pieces* of Fredthebear's Chess Art ! ! by fredthebear
Sicilian Scheveningen. English Attack (B80) 0-1 Fearless N!!
from Polgar Power Originally Compiled by wanabe2000 by fredthebear
woodenbishop's favorite games #5
by woodenbishop
Kasparov crushes in his favorite Najdorf…great attack!
from Alapin 2...Nd5 ....4.Bc4 gambit line by Nova
Sicilian, Najdorf (B90)
from Italian Game: Evans Gambit games by vasileios
Leszek's favorite games
by Leszek
najdorfs for black
by S.Brew
Najdorf
from Potential Sicilian Openings by EndlessKnot
Ataque Inglés 1
by Najdorf1
Kasparov
by djangsan
Oops He Did It Again!
from Kasparov's Sicilian Wizardry by Chesscomedian


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC