chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Alexey Shirov vs Shakhriyar Mamedyarov
Tal Memorial (2006), Moscow RUS, rd 1, Nov-06
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Breyer Defense Zaitsev Hybrid (C95)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 16 more Shirov/Mamedyarov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-06-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  outplayer: 15...d5 16.Bg5 Shirov improved on Polgar's play in Essent but his moves only led to a draw. Is it the end of this line?
Nov-06-06  Resignation Trap: <outplayer> Yes, this was the same line as Judit Polgar vs Mamedyarov, 2006 , and Shirov followed the suggested improvement. Unless something more forceful (or more risky) is found, I'd say that it is the end of the line.
Nov-06-06  bernardchinshin: What happens if 20...Nxe5?
Nov-06-06  aw1988: I think 20...Nxe5 21. cxd4 Ned7 22. Bf5
Nov-07-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ahmadov: <Resignation Trap: <outplayer> Yes, this was the same line as Judit Polgar vs Mamedyarov, 2006 , and Shirov followed the suggested improvement.> When Polgar played that game she just intended to get 0.5 to win the tournament. Does your comment mean that Shirov followed the suggested improvement to draw the game? In other words, did Shirov played this opening with an aim to get 0.5 points? Is he becoming a player who wishes to get points only playing for draws?
Nov-07-06  Atking: <bernardchinshin: What happens if 20...Nxe5? aw1988: I think 20...Nxe5 21. cxd4 Ned7 22. Bf5> Or 22.Qd3 Qc8 (22. ...Bg7 23.Nh5!) 23.BxNf6 NxBf6 27.Nh5 Bg7 28.NxBg7 KxNg7 29.Qg3+ Kf8 30.Qh4 Ne4 31.f3 wins
Nov-07-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: Why isn't <notyetagm> and the rest of the pack here to blast the players for this cowardly draw? Should I expect a reply along the lines of "This game wasn't boring, didn't you see Shirov's amazing Tal-like piece sac OMG he is a genius unlike the boring Drawko"?
Nov-07-06  alicefujimori: <ahmadov><When Polgar played that game she just intended to get 0.5 to win the tournament.>This is obviously not true. Polgar played for a win in that game with 23.Nf5 and went on to lose. 23.Nh5 is theory and was played before the Polgar game and this game.

<acirce>That's probably because Shirov doesn't do this often. Obviously, Shirov had his reasons to be happy with a draw in this game. Warm up, perhaps? Anyway, this is only round 1 so let wait and see what happens before getting emotional about the words "drawing" and "boring" again. :)

Nov-07-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ahmadov: <alicefujimori> How do you know that Nf5 was played for a win? That was just a blunder by Polgar. Many people stated this even on this web site while the game was relayed live.

Nov-07-06  alicefujimori: <ahmadov><How do you know that Nf5 was played for a win? That was just a blunder by Polgar.>I doubt that was a delibrate blunder by Judit because 23.Nh5 was known theory and one would be a fool to assume that Judit does not know about 23.Nh5 as she had already entered into this variation before in her game against Spassky in 1993.

So the question is, why would Judit tried to improve with another move when she knew already that 23.Nh5 could have led to a probable draw, especially when you claim that she was playing for a draw? The answer is obviously, she wasn't playing for a draw. She tried to improve on previous games (you only do that when you want to win, especialy when there was another move that was known to lead to a probable draw) but it didn't work out and it backfired on her.

Nov-07-06  MyriadChoices: Why not 32. Ne4+
Nov-07-06  suenteus po 147: <acirce> Because, unlike Kramnik or Leko, Shirov has no fans and therefore cannot do any damage to world chess with his games :)
Nov-07-06  Resignation Trap: Here is a photo of this game in progress: http://www.russiachess.org/eng/imag...

According to the official website, the players reached move 28 after only five minutes of play.

Nov-07-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: I'll bet they spent 4 minutes and 30 seconds of that time writing down the moves.
Nov-07-06  Resignation Trap: It doesn't surprise me that Shirov went in for this sacrificial line. He also has enjoyed the Perenyi Attack as in the game Shirov vs Judit Polgar, 1996 . Judit Polgar later took up this line herself, for example: Judit Polgar vs Svidler, 1998 .

I believe that anybody who wants to improve upon his playing skills, a study of the tabiya (after 19.Bxg5) :


click for larger view

with or without players of the silicon persuasion, would be beneficial.

Nov-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ahmadov: <WannaBe: I'll bet they spent 4 minutes and 30 seconds of that time writing down the moves.> LOL (of course, after reading the previous post to which this one concerns)
Nov-13-06  gauer: Resignation Trap: how should each side aim to sac a piece here, or decide where to place the pieces or pawns?


click for larger view

Theory I keep reading about says that the major theme is (1) sliding the Q-pawns up a rank (as per Chigorin), (2) going for a Marshall (or sometimes Tarrasch Open) pawn chain with (a,c6, b,d5) and open K-file, (3) exchanging at d4 to get a semi-open Q-file vs counter-playwith the c5 break (4) taking on on the K-line to open the Q-line, (5) opening the Q-flank files with a4, (6) holding back with d3 instead of d(4(->5)), playing a Spanish Italian game.

The diagram seems to tend to want to take too many pawns off too quickly (at least, for my liking), and so in this strategy, which P-structure is each side aiming for, and where is best to place the pieces to hold the tension.

Nov-13-06  Ezzy: An excellent analysis on this line by Lubomir Kavalek in the Washington post.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...

Nov-13-06  percyblakeney: <Ezzy> Navara's analysis is very interesting. Shirov took a long think trying to find something better than a draw but didn't see Navara's suggestion <29.Ng7+ Kd7 30.Bf5+ Ke7 31.Qf4>. It could have continued with for example <31. ... Kd6 32. Bg4 Kc5 33. b4+ Kxb4> and white can choose between taking the knight or the bishop in this exciting position where black will have some problems to solve:


click for larger view

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
andrzejkrzywda's favorite games
by andrzejkrzywda
chess champion 8's favorite games
by chess champion 8


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC