| Nov-10-06 | | alicefujimori: A very good display of technique by Leko in this game. 32.g6! was the beginning of black's trouble. |
 |
| Nov-10-06 | | percyblakeney: Leko has played many games against Gelfand but this was his first win (apart from a blindfold game). |
 |
Nov-10-06
 | | notyetagm: <alicefujimori: A very good display of technique by Leko in this game. 32.g6! was the beginning of black's trouble.> Yes, very nice move 32 g6!. The point being 32 ... fxg6?? 33 c4+ wins by threatening to <REMOVE THE GUARD> of the loose Black f8-knight. |
 |
| Nov-10-06 | | sheaf: its nice to see leko back to his best maybe we are going to see some good quality chess in near future |
 |
Nov-10-06
 | | Ulhumbrus: Leko makes his extra Knight count in the ending partly by means of persistant tactical trickery, making use of the ability of the Knight to deliver forks again and again. |
 |
| Nov-10-06 | | TheSlid: A brilliant display, I felt, by Leko. Almost a commentary on the worthlessness of the friendless soldier. |
 |
Nov-10-06
 | | Eyal: 32.g6 is indeed a good move, but maybe 32...Rd7 can still hold for black (33.Rxd7 Nxd7 34.Bc4 Ne5); 32...b5 looks like active play, but is too weakening. |
 |
| Nov-10-06 | | crazy monk: 41..Kxe6? Why not Rxb6 avoid check and N cannot defend the b pawn |
 |
| Nov-10-06 | | you vs yourself: <crazy monk> But black can't immediately attack the b-pawn. If the rook was on the 7th rank, there's nothing that stops it from going to the b-file; on the 6th rank, the rook's being blocked by its own pawns. |
 |
Nov-10-06
 | | acirce: Some good technical grinding by Lékó here. Well done! I wonder two things though, 1) why not 30.e5 (perhaps 30..Ne6 31.f4 is more optically than objectively good?, 30..Bxe5 31.Rd8+ Nf8 32.Bc5 though), 2) why not 32..Rd7 (looked natural enough, but perhaps doesn't completely solve his problems) |
 |
| Nov-11-06 | | aw1988: <acirce> Rd7 Rxd7 Nxd7 Bh3 |
 |
| Nov-12-06 | | percyblakeney: <32. ... Rd7 33. Rxd7 Nxd7 34. Bh3> Nc5 and black has no problems, but Gelfand was in time trouble by then. |
 |