chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Geza Maroczy vs Francis Joseph Lee
London (1899), London ENG, rd 2, May-31
Caro-Kann Defense: Maroczy Variation. Maroczy Gambit (B12)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Maroczy/F J Lee game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
    [help]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-10-08  xrt999: at move 25 Maroczy has a solid position: the bishop pair, centralized king on e4, pawn wall on the d thru f file. White appears winning.

Lee forces a draw, however, capitalizing on less than perfect play by Maroczy. Lee turns Maroczy's centralized king into a weakness by pinning it to the e file with the rook on e8. White's play is invariably halted, and cant build an attack, forced to defend d4 for the rest of the game.

Looking at the end position, I feel that actually white should <not> have centralized his king and left it at g2, taken the knight immediately with 25.Bxe6, then built up an attack with doubled rooks on the h file.

Materially, in this context, both sides have the dark squared bishops, will double rooks, <BUT> white has the potent pawn wall on d4,e5,f4 and g3, with no open files. White is winning.

Nov-21-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Maroczy had numerous chances to win this game. His 3. f3 against the Caro-Kann befuddled Lee, who got himself into the equivalent of a bad version of the Scotch Gambit, and then erred with 8...Qc5 and (even worse with 9...QxQ check). Maroczy would have done better with 9. Be3, but even after that he would have had an overwhelming game with 11. RxB instead of 11.PxB. It was no doubt tempting to have a pawn mass in the center, and this no doubt should have been sufficient to win, but with an open f file for his Rook Marozcy should have had an easy win had he played 11. RxB. Even after missing these chances, he should not (as xrt999 correctly points out) have sent his king on an expedition to e4 on his (faulty) 23rd and 24th moves. By move 25, the win was gone, and I do not agree that Maroczy could still have won with 25. BxN. Although the win was probably gone, Maroczy should at least have tried 36. f5 as the Tournament Book recommends. After that, if he wanted any winning chances, Maroczy had to try g4 on Move 37, 39, 41, or 44. Lee could have prevented this with h5 on his 38th, 40th, 41st, and 43rd moves. However, neither g4 by White nor h5 by Black was played, and this less than classic ending was drawn after Maroczy's 44th move.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
London 1899
by suenteus po 147
London 1899
by JoseTigranTalFischer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC