chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Geza Maroczy vs Jackson Whipps Showalter
London (1899), London ENG, rd 20, Jun-26
French Defense: McCutcheon. Exchange Variation (C12)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more Maroczy/Showalter games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-01-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Maroczy missed his chance to win this game.

Showalter's 14...g5 was criticized by the Tournament Book, but it could have led to approximate equality if properly followed up.

Although Showalter overreached a bit with 16...g4 and 17...Nc4, after Maroczy's 20. Qd2 (20. Nh5 was better) both sides had about equal chances.

But here Showalter erred with 20...NxB (instead of 20...Qh4).

The Tournament Book faults Maroczy's 22. Ne4 (claiming 22. Rad1 was better) and 23. RxQ (contending that the intermediate move 23. Nf6+ was best), but so far as I can discern Maroczy's play was sufficient to maintain a winning edge.

In a bad position, Showalter gamely sacrificed the exchange for a pawn with 23...RxN. This certainly appears to have been Showalter's best chance, but Maroczy could have (and on a good day no doubt would have) nursed his advantage to victory.

Both Fritz and the Tournament Book claim that Maroczy threw away his win with 28. Rfe1 and that the similar looking 28. Rae1 was correct. The abandonment of the f-file does indeed appear to have been a mistake, and after Maroczy's very weak 30. b3 (instead of the much better 30. Rad1) his winning chances, despite his nominal material advantage seem to have evaporated.

Fritz (or at least my version of Fritz) thinks that Showalter's 33...axb4 followed by the exchange of Rooks was a losing blunder. But this is one of those end-game instances in which the judgment of a flesh and blood chess-player proves to be superior to our silicon friends. Although Fritz gives Maroczy a winning edge after 33...axb4 (a move Fritz condemns), Maroczy could make no headway in the resulting Rook and five pawns against Bishop and six pawns ending, and Fritz--though refusing to concede the win was gone- was unable to come up with any winning plans for the remaining more than twenty moves of the game.

Marozcy's error came on move 28 (and to a lesser extent on move 30). After that, Showalter's accurate play kept the draw in hand, Fritz' insistence to the contrary notwithstanding.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
===Exchange Variation (C12d)=== w/ 6. Be3:
from French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation by ratso
London 1899
by JoseTigranTalFischer
===Exchange Variation (C12d)=== w/ 6. Be3:
from French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation by JoseTigranTalFischer
London 1899
by suenteus po 147


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC