chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Vassily Ivanchuk vs Bu Xiangzhi
"Peek-a-Bu" (game of the day May-26-2008)
M-Tel Masters (2008), Sofia BUL, rd 3, May-10
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense. King's Knight Variation (A15)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 18 times; par: 49 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Ivanchuk/Bu Xiangzhi games
sac: 9.Bxb5+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-12-08  Nullifidian: <shortsight> It seems my initial assessment wasn't wrong. Believe it or not, when I responded that "It seems perfectly obvious to me", I had been asked a question as to why a certain player would seek out a forced mate in such a strong position. I responded, tongue in cheek, with that sentence in my reply. In other words, the reason is perfectly obvious, to get back to the hotel room and grab an early dinner.

If you cannot understand that this was part of the ongoing conversation, and instead rip it out of context to refer back to my initial statement, that is not my fault nor is it my problem.

If you object to my use of the word "missed", I must direct your attention to practically every endgame book ever written or translated into English. What else would one call it but a "missed mate"?

Lastly, regarding your complaint, what would you say about a person who sarcastically condescends to another in order to shut that other up, as you have confessed to doing?

May-12-08  Nullifidian: <tpstar> Sorry for the typo above. I mean 30. Rc1
May-12-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  minasina: Rybka analysis, some critical points and variations http://chessok.com/broadcast/live.p...
May-13-08  VargPOD: Wow, that was an opening gone bad. 5...b5 looks like it is playable, main line being 6.b3 e6 7.d4 leading to Slav/Semi-Slav-type positions. 6...Bg4 is already suspicious, 7...Bh5 is bad and 8...cxb5 loses.

Another game with 6...Bg4, which black won, but IMHO white had a better position after the opening: D Komarov vs E Prie, 2007

May-13-08  euripides: I followed some of this game live online. I think Ivanchuk played quite slowly at around moves 15-20 and I thought (given that simply winning was trivial) he must be looking for a brilliant finish of some sort. So I think it's fair enough to say he missed it, if there was one.
May-13-08  euripides: ... trivial, of course, for players of this strength - I'm sure I'd have found a way to lose against Bu.
May-17-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: 27. Ne2 would also have won: 27...e5 28. Ng3 d4 29. exd4 exd4 30. Qc4 Bd5 31. Qxd4 Bxb3 32. Qg4+ Qg5 33. Qe4+; 27...Bf5 28. Nf4+ Bxf4 29. exf4 Bxh3 30. Qg3+ Kf5 31. Qxh3+ Ke4 32. Re1+ Kd4 33. Qc3/Qe3#
May-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Would 19...d4 have been any kind of improvement? The Queen exchange should lead to a win anyway, but perhaps the Bishops and a central pawn advance offer some mild annoyance.
May-26-08  apexin: 19...d4 would be an improvement but white should still win easely quick analysis by the deep schredder: 1:29 +7.32 20.Qa5+ Kf6 21.O-O+ Bf5 22.Rxf5+ Kg6 (22...exf5 23.Nd5+ and white wins a queen)23.Rf4 dxe3 24.dxe3 Bd6 25.Rg4+ Kh6 26.Qc3 g6 27.Rc4 e5 28.Rd1 Qe7 29.Nb5 depth 14ply and mate in 12 moves:

26/43 2:11 +M12 20...Kg4 21.Qf3+ Kh4 22.g3+ Kh3 23.Qf1+ Kg4 24.h4 Qf6 25.Qh3+ Kf3 26.g4+ Kf4 27.Rf1+ Ke5 28.Qg3+ Qf4 29.Qxf4+ Kd4 30.Qf2+ Ke5 31.Nb5 Bxe4 32.Qf4+# (167.559.948) 1275

May-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Bu got out of the wrong side of bed. There can be no argument about that.
May-26-08  Schach and Awe: <Nullifidian: I skimmed through the comments, and didn't see this mentioned, but Ivanchuk missed a forced mate in thirteen starting with 20. e4+> Missing mate in 13 is hardly an oversight, while someone missing mate in 5 in a non-blitz game might be. Offering to sac the d-pawn is hardly obvious, as it was to one of the world's top GMs in this game. I agree wholeheartedly with notyetagm. I think nullifidian's remark should have read something like 'Hey, my program found mate in 13 on move 20.'
May-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Once: 20. e4+ allows black 5 legal moves - two ways to capture the pawn and three king moves. Silicon may prove that each (or some?) leads to a forced mate in 12, but so what?

With the clock ticking, who wants to analyse five different lines to this depth? In a real game, we castle with check and smile.

For my money, this is not a missed line by Ivanchuk, just grandmaster pragmatism.

May-26-08  Wone Jone: Ah yes, dontcha love the oldies?
May-26-08  Castleinthesky: Bu-whoo?
May-27-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: The pun reminds me of the wing of a hospital named after Picabo Street,the olympic skier,

THE PICABO ICU

Jun-16-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  minasina: Rybka analyses relocated (see my previous post): http://chessok.com/broadcast/live.p...

INTERNET CHESS CLUB / Chess.FM, FREE "GAME OF THE DAY": http://webcast.chessclub.com/Mtel08... commentary by GM Larry Christiansen

Jul-28-08  Slurpeeman: how bout 21. Qe5+ Kh6; 22. Qf4+ Kh5 23. g4+ Kh4 24. Qg3+ Kg5; 25. h4+ Kh6 26. Qf4+ Qg5 27. fxg5#
Sep-03-08  sicilianhugefun: a display of profound understanding from chuky
Sep-25-08  bunkerputt: <For my money, this is not a missed line by Ivanchuk, just grandmaster pragmatism.>

I tend to think he missed things. Chucky was in severe time trouble towards the end (with something like less than 2 mins left at move 20. Surely he was using his time thinking about something. I don't think he really got the idea of playing e4 to open lines for the Queen to the Kingside until later (Qe1 connecting to e3 and g3). I, of course, would also have played 0-0+ just because it's so hard to resist. But it hardly seems pragmatic to get into time pressure, when not winning would be more of an embarassment for Ivanchuk than losing would be for Bu.

Sep-25-08  bunkerputt: <notyetagm>, This game should be titled "Ivanchuk handed winning position by a 2700 on move 9(!)"

;)

Sep-25-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ladolcevita: just a blunder of BU......
Nov-11-08  notyetagm: http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/fil...
Nov-11-08  notyetagm: 9 ?


click for larger view

9 ♗f1xb5+!


click for larger view

<bunkerputt: <notyetagm>, This game should be titled "Ivanchuk handed winning position by a 2700 on move 9(!)"

;)>

Yes, it's not often that you get a completely winning position against a 2700-rated player on move 9(!!).

Apr-23-09  andrewleef1: I though Bu played Qh4 before he resigned
Jan-01-16  morfishine: "Peek-a-Bu" ?!?!?!?!? You are kidding right? What is this, Romper Room?
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Advanced tactics
by Jaredfchess
Bookmarked games
by Cushion
Slav tabia bishop sac
from Craigokat's favorite games by Craigokat
Kingside Castling on move 20 makes check immediately
from Aggressive Castling as a Tactic-- OTB Examples by ChessCoachClark
Ivanchuk gets a winning position against a 2700 on move 9(!)
from IVANCHUK: CHESS GENIUS by notyetagm
11 Nd5xNf6+ destroys f6-knight defender of d7-knight,square
from REMOVE THE GUARD: ILLUSORY PROTECTION by notyetagm
9. Bxb5+! +- wins outright
from Opening blunders punished. by patzer2
Game of the May-26-08
from Games of the day 4 by Herkus
Game of the day 2
by vikinx
english opening
from benjobench's game collection by benjobench
Opening skratch
from Notable Sacrifices by vladedivac
Nick's Favorite Games
by nd792001
Sofia 2008
from # Greatest Tournaments 2008 by Qindarka
martinsaw's favorite games II
by martinsaw
Advanced tactics
by obrit
May 26: Peek-a-Bu
from Game of the Day 2008 by Phony Benoni


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC