chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Parimarjan Negi vs Alexander Shabalov
World Open (2008), Philadelphia, PA USA, rd 8, Jul-06
French Defense: Steinitz Variation (C11)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Negi/Shabalov game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-08-08  Strongest Force: Looks like Shabalov wasn't prepared or maybe he ate some bad hamburgers or something. :) PN still deserves some credit. :)
Jul-08-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: 18. Ne6+ would have won the ♕ for ♘+♗. 19. Ne6+ would have won the ♕ for one minor piece. After 20. Qxa4 black was a whole ♖ down, but kept playing for five more moves. Can the game score be right??
Jul-08-08  Strongest Force: Yeah, al wazir, shabby couldn't be this bad, even if he did eat some bad food. :)
Jul-08-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  DarthStapler: I saw this game being played in person
Jul-08-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <Darth>: So are you saying that the moves ARE correct as listed? Black, a 2600+ player, played this game??

Correction: After 19. Ne6+ Qxe6 20. fxe6 Nf3+, black recovers gets white's ♕ and remains an exchange down until move 20, when he lost a ♘.

Jul-08-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  DarthStapler: Well I just arrived after the 23rd move or so, but yes, it seems to be correct. I have no idea what Shabalov was doing, I probably could have done better than this.
Jul-10-08  Phoenix: Yes, the moves are correct. I heard second-hand that Negi considered winning the queen, but already being up material he did not want to give up his two best pieces and help black activate his. This decision and explanation sounds reasonable to me.
Jul-11-08  erniecohen: This doesn't look credible. 19... ♔g8 (19...♘f3)? 15. ♕d2 (15.♘g5)? 18. f5?
Jul-18-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mendrys: This very well could be a case of Shabalov blundering and missing the discovered check Ne6+ at 18 or 19. and Negi thinking that Shabalov couldn't possibly miss such an easy tactic and playing something else.

He could have been thinking at move 19 "OMG, I can't believe I missed that discovered check" and being so rattled blundering again with 19. Kg8.

Jul-18-08  Phoenix: I was at the tournament, and my second-hand source is very, very credible.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC