chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Vladimir Kramnik vs Viswanathan Anand
Anand - Kramnik World Championship Match (2008)  ·  Slav Defense: Exchange. Trifunovic Variation (D14)  ·  1/2-1/2
To move:
Last move:

explore this opening
find similar games 166 more Kramnik/Anand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) either press F or click on the e7 square.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 29 OF 29 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-16-08  you vs yourself: The game was still interesting to me as a spectator but from a competitive standpoint, it is disappointing to see Kramnik play a drawish line with his first white.
Oct-16-08  AnalyzeThis: It is a truism in chess though, that you don't want to try too hard. Kramink only need 1 victory, he can draw all the other games, like Petrosian did to Korchnoi once.
Oct-16-08  you vs yourself: True but if he loses the match, the 1 victory he needed could be this missed chance. Considering how much stronger he's with white pieces than with black, picking a drawish line in one of the six whites after having so much time to prepare doesn't make sense.

He could pick a more ambitious line and still draw but then he wouldn't have any regrets about this game should he lose the match.

Oct-16-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Softpaw: <you vs yourself: Should he lose the match, he would look back and see where he could've done more. This game would stand out because of the supposedly drawish line he chose...>

Maybe, but not necessarily. If Kramnik NEEDS to warm up, NEEDS to establish a certain degree of control, etc., to play his best, then that first drawish-line game could POSITIVELY EFFECT the rest of the games - a possibility that must be put into the equation.

Compare a boxing match where a fighter doesn't go all out in the first round in a 12 round match, then goes on to lose the match on the judges cards by one round. If one then tried to say that the losing boxer's first "take it easy" round was key to loss, that would be completely illogical.

Oct-16-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: I agree completely, yvy.

BTW, I tried to check in the database but couldn't find it: What's the record between you and yourself?

Oct-16-08  Petrosianic: <Compare a boxing match where a fighter doesn't go all out in the first round in a 12 round match, then goes on to lose the match on the judges cards by one round. If one then tried to say that the losing boxer's first "take it easy" round was key to loss, that would be completely illogical.>

Only if we grant what you said in your first paragraph, that he NEEDS to warm up first. Sure, if he NEEDS it, and won't perform as well without it, then it wouldn't make much sense to blame the warmup round for his defeat.

On the other hand, you'd have to think that a fighter who didn't need it, and could hit the boards running might be a better fighter.

If we grant your assumption that he needed it, then it might have been better to lose the draw for colours. I wonder if it's ever happened that a player gave up his right to draw, and asked for Black in Game 1.

Oct-16-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Softpaw: <Petrosianic: Only if we grant what you said in your first paragraph, that he NEEDS to warm up first. Sure, if he NEEDS it, and won't perform as well without it, then it wouldn't make much sense to blame the warmup round for his defeat.>

Exactly!

Look at it his way. Suppose Kramnik had gone all out in the first game, choosing an aggressive line. Suppose he ran into some stellar prep by Anand, got into some really hot water, almost lost, but pulled out a draw. The result would seem to be the same as in the real first game: a draw.

But that's true only if you don't take in the psychological dimension. The result in my hypothetical case might not be JUST a draw, but also a weakening of Kramnik's confidence. He might, after that result, have responded just slightly less well to Anand's surprise f3 Nimzo in the second game and ended up losing.

This is all pure conjecture of course, but the point remains: the match is a psychological totality, and you must take that fact into consideration when judging the results of any particular game.

Kramnik, I'm sure, has an excellent conception of his match psychology and likely had plenty of good reasons for playing the line he did in the first game.

The proof has been, and will be, in the pudding, of course.

Nov-17-08  TommyC: Some of these comments make interesting reading in retrospect!
Nov-20-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: I am working on a web page for this game, it should be completed soon.
Nov-20-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: By the way, I did not find this game boring. (And either one of these super GM's would have ripped the average player to shreds!)
Nov-22-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: http://www.geocities.com/lifemaster...

The diagrams are not up yet, (01:19 AM); but I will fix that in the morning.

Nov-22-08  hrvyklly: <LIFE Master AJ: ... either one of these super GM's would have ripped the average player to shreds> Shouldn't that read *average GM*?
Nov-22-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: whatever
Nov-22-08  hrvyklly: Jeez, lighten up. I was agreeing with you about the criticism this game received.
Nov-23-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: 01:26 AM The diagrams are now posted, the game is finished ... I move on to game two.
Nov-23-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: I'm too heavy ... I was born on Jupiter ... the gravity there is many times the pull of this little rock.
Nov-23-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: Of course, its late. And I am tired. And I getting both a little silly and a little "toopid" as well.
Dec-01-08  TommyC: <AJ> ~ I see you made no comment about 17...a5. But I'm pretty sure Anand said after that was the crucial move to guarantee a draw. Also Kramnik said computers playing white in these kinds of positions always seem to find ways to keep the game going ---- perhaps because deep and accurate moves like ...a5 don't always get played against them?
Dec-01-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: <TommyC>
Since I got several e-mails about this one item, I - just now- added a comment after 17...a5.
Dec-02-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: One die-hard Rybka fan wrote me to tell me that ...a5 had to be a mistake, as it changed the computer's eval's of the position (for the worse) by about half a pawn.

Most Rybka fan's are cool, but some are not always reasonable ... and they have become less so now that Rybka has (FINALLY!?!?) won the world's machine title.

Aug-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  visayanbraindoctor: Analysis in User: Bridgeburner

PART 1

<INTRODUCTION>

Kramnik vs Anand, 2008 is the <first game of the 2008 title match>.

Quantitative mapping of this game between these players is below. Figures in brackets immediately after each move are the corrected engine evaluations generated on the return slide. The reverse slide smoothed out many, but not all fluctuation in the engines evaluations. The complexity of some variations was very likely too great to enable a fuller reconciliation from the forward slide. <General methods used are described in the bio.>

The evaluation values in the opening come at the end of a full forward slide to the last move of the game and a full return slide back to the starting position. Engine preferences are not included in this game because of the extremely tight evaluation (ie: negligible) differences between all moves, rendering the exercise meaningless.

<Summary>

The game is essentially divided into two phases:

- Opening, middle game and queen exchange, and a couple of more moves known to opening theory (moves 1-17), simplifying directly into a

- Highly drawish endgame (moves 17-32)

With a passing resemblance to a grandmaster draw, this game looks like a cautious opening skirmish without a punch being thrown, probably a game to settle the nerves for the fight ahead. Neither player gained any advantage to speak - the small advantage White accumulated in the opening gradually bled away.

Aug-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  visayanbraindoctor: Bridgeburner: PART 2

<THE GAME>

<1. d4> (=0.15) <1d5> (=0.16)

<2. c4> (=0.11) <2c6> (=0.16)

<3. Nc3> (=0.15) <3Nf6> ( 0.23)

<4. cxd5> (=0.20) <4cxd5> (=0.20)

<5. Bf4> (=0.00) <5Nc6> (=0.18)

<6. e3> (=0.18) <6Bf5> (=0.18)

<7. Nf3> (=0.12) <7e6> (=0.17)

<8. Qb3> (=0.17) <8Bb4> (=0.17)

<9. Bb5> (=0.17) <90-0> ( 0.31)

<10. Bxc6> ( 0.31) <10Bxc3+> ( 0.31)

<11. Qxc3> ( 0.31) <11Rc8> ( 0.31)

<12. Ne5> ( 0.31) <12Ng4> ( 0.50)

<13. Nxg4> ( 0.50) <13Bxg4> ( 0.50)

<14. Qb4> ( 0.50) <14Rxc6> ( 0.50)

<15. Qxb7> ( 0.50) <15Qc8> ( 0.50)

<16. Qxc8> ( 0.50) <16Rfxc8> ( 0.50)

<17. 0-0> ( 0.50)

This marks the end of theory in respect of this opening as shown in the chessgames.com database. The only other game in the database to reach this point and move on was Z Pengxiang vs Zhou Weiqi, 2009 which continued with <17f6>, quickly resulting in a draw.

Aug-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  visayanbraindoctor: Bridgeburner: PART 3

<17a5> ( 0.61)

<18. f3> ( 0.61) <18Bf5> ( 0.61)

<19. Rfe1> ( 0.47) <19Bg6> ( 0.58)

<20. b3> ( 0.50) <20f6> ( 0.50)

<21. e4> ( 0.35) <21dxe4> ( 0.35)

<22. fxe4> ( 0.35) <22Rd8> ( 0.35)

<23. Rad1> ( 0.35) <23Rc2> ( 0.35)

<24. e5> (=0.19) <24fxe5> (=0.19)

<25. Bxe5> (=0.19) <25Rxa2> (=0.19)

<26. Ra1> (=0.19) <26Rxa1> (=0.19)

<27. Rxa1> (=0.19) <27Rd5> (=0.20)

<28. Rc1> (=0.20) <28Rd7> (=0.20)

<29. Rc5> (=0.20) <29Ra7> (=0.20)

<30. Rc7> (=0.00) <30Rxc7> (0.00)

<31. Bxc7> (=0.00) <31Bc2> (=0.00)

<32.Bxa5> (=0.00) <32Bxb3> (=0.00)

Draw agreed.

Aug-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  visayanbraindoctor: Bridgeburner: PART 4

<ANALYSIS>

<Note> The fluctuations generated in the relatively low (16 minimum) ply forward slide were smoothed out in the equivalent return slide. The corrected evaluations extracted from the return slide are used in this analysis, as they are considered more reliable than the raw evaluations generated on the initial forward slide. All moves have been evaluated on forward and return slide for completeness.

<Evaluation range>:

Between < 0.00> applying to the opening move <5.Bf4> and the move group <30. Rc7 Rxc7 31. Bxc7 Bc2 32. Bxa5 Bxb3> - representing complete equality - and < 0.61> in respect of the move <17a5 18.f3 Bf5> representing a minor advantage for White.

<The largest evaluation shift(s)>:

- for White was 0.20 between <4cxd5> (=0.20) and <5. Bf4> (=0.00). However this should be excluded from consideration because it is a strategic move in the early opening.

White had another evaluation shift of <0.20> between <29Ra7> (=0.20) and <30.Rc7> (=0.00). However, the drawn nature of the position at this stage of the game indicates a minor level of evaluation inflation and will also be excluded from consideration.

The next largest evaluation shift for White was 0.16 between <23Rc2> ( 0.35) and <24.e5> (=0.19).

- for Black were 0.19 between <12. Ne5> 0.31) and <12Ng4> (=/ 0.50), followed by 0.18 between <5. Bf4> and <5Nc6>. and 0.14 between <9.Bb5> (=0.18) and <90-0> (+/+0.31).

If these are excluded because of their established positions in opening theory, the next largest evaluation shift was 0.11 between <17. 0-0> ( 0.50) and <17a5> ( 0.61).

<Computer statistics>:

93.8% of the ply in this game (60/64) coincided with engine preferences 1, 2 or 3

81.25% of the ply in the game (52/64) coincided with engine preferences 1 or 2

66.1% of the ply in the game (41/64) coincided with the engines first preference

90.6% of Kramniks moves (29/32) coincided with the engine preferences 1, 2 and 3

96.9% of Anands moves (31/32) coincided engine preferences 1, 2 and 3

81.3% of Kramniks moves (26/32) coincided with engine preferences 1 and 2

81.3% of Anands moves (26/32) coincided with engine preferences 1 and 2

65.6% of Kramniks moves (21/32) coincided with the engines first preference

62.5% (20/32) of Anands moves coincided with the engines first preference.

<The engine evaluation of the final position>:

was <=0.00> in a position agreed drawn.

<CONCLUSION>

<Using method A, the game is weighted at 0, representing 0 bad moves and 0 blunders by both Anand or Kramnik.

Using method B, the game is weighted 0 at representing 0 blunders, 0 bad moves, and 0 dubious moves by both Anand or Kramnik.>

Oct-31-10  micartouse: I would guess Kramnik's intriguing opening choice was informed by his previous match experience. In his previous 3 title matches, his opponent came at him very aggressively in the first few rounds and lost. He may have been hoping to provoke his opponent to overextend in a solid opening.

It is to Anand's credit that he played well and drew easily - we don't need to fault Kramnik one bit for trying to recreate the type of environment that previously worked for him.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 29)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 29 OF 29 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Exchange
from Key Slav games by parmetd
Slav Defense: Exchange. Trifunovic Variation
from adichess' Slave by adichess
Slav Exchange Qb3
from Notes by VladimirOo
Game 1
from Kramnik-Anand 2008 by ThePawnOTron2
slave exchange with Qb3
from openings by arnaud1959
dead draw.
from holygrail's favorites. by holygrail
fgdamasceno's favorite games
by fgdamasceno
Kramnik-Anand
by fref
+3 -1 =7 vs. Kramnik (World Championship, Bonn)
from Match Anand! by amadeus
+1 -3 =7 vs. Anand (World Championship, Bonn)
from Match Kramnik! by amadeus
fgd1844's favorite games
by fgd1844
Game 1, Match tied 1/2-1/2
from 2008 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
01/2008 Anand-Kramnik World Championship Match
from Meus Jogos Favoritos by charlespennaforte
Game 1
from 2008 WC Kramnik-Anand by DocGonzo


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies