chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Harold James Plaskett vs John Emms
BCF-ch (1986), Southampton ENG, rd 4, Aug-??
Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D56)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Plaskett/Emms games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-06-09  SamAtoms1980: Whiz, bam.

I pwned Plaskett. Now give me my fifty quid.

Jan-06-09  ruzon: This game reminded me so much of a similar puzzle (Najdorf vs NN, 1942) that I tried 23. ♕xf7 ♖xf7 24. ♘d7+ and only noticed ♘g6# after that.
Jan-06-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <euripides><It's not just that the solver of a puzzle knows there's something to find; it's also that they see the position first, without the associated body of analysis in which it is, for the players, already embedded.>

Yes, the dynamic analysis in the minds of the OTB players is sort of like momentum. Usually, it works in their favor, relative to us puzzle solvers who must start from a stand-still position.

But sometimes (as in this case), this momentum it works against them, causing them to stumble past the point where they should've stopped to considered other tactics. :-)

Jan-06-09  MrSpock: It is so easy if you know that there must be a combination. But even for Kasparow it is hard to find every combination in every game.
Jan-06-09  zooter: well, this reminds me of a tournament where I was performing rather poorly (3/6 points) and in the last round....

The lights went off and candles were arranged on each table...it was dusk and quite dark

the game went like this

White: XXXXX
Black: zooter

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 d6??

Because of the shadows, I didn't realize that my bishop was under attack and was almost ready to resign and go home to rest when my opponent incredibly played

6.0-0??

allowing me to escape. He went on to win though (he is rated 1850+ and I'm still unrated) though this shows that sometimes we just don't think too well....

Or maybe he too got confused by the shadows!

Jan-06-09  binno: dzechiel: i had say <Whew!> too!
Jan-06-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Tallinn> Good analysis of 22...g6. After your suggestion of 23. Nxg6+! fxg6 25. Qxh6+ Kg8, Black is at a clear disadvantage. In addition to your suggested 26. Bh4 , White can also cause Black a lot of discomfort with 26. e4 .

Still it's better than allowing a mate-in-two after 22...Ra7? 23. Qxf7+! And it may be as good as any of Black's other unpleasant 22nd move options, as you indicate in your analysis.

Jan-06-09  xrt999: white still won the game right? That is the goal of chess so I am told...
Jan-06-09  ughaibu: I think the goal, the "why", of chess is to have fun, attempting to win is part of the "how", one of the rules.
Jan-08-09  xrt999: I play chess as a sport: my goal is to win.

SPORT: That is why I NEVER resign. Do the Yankees resign in the 8th inning when they are losing 15-0? NO. In ANY other sport, it is considered rude and bad sportsmanship to give up, EXCEPT in chess. I have never been able to explain this.

SPORT: Would Mike Tyson rather box against Holyfield or Duran? That is why I would rather lose 5,000 games in a row to a GM, than win 1 game against someone my own strength or lower.

SPORT: Ask Kramnik, when he sits down against Anand, what is your goal sir? To have fun?

Do you play a SPORT or a GAME?

Jan-08-09  ughaibu: "That is why I NEVER resign": hopefully I won't encounter you at BrainKing.
Jan-12-09  TheaN: <Do the Yankees resign in the 8th inning when they are losing 15-0? NO.>

No, because they can make 16 points in one inning, for as much as my baseball knowledge goes...

<That is why I NEVER resign.>

But in chess, the likelihood that someone gives away as low as a piece advantage, as in the opening blunder zooter posted, are very slim. If you are down a Queen and Rook, on the other hand, playing seems more of a torture than a game to win.

Chess and checkers are in that way unique that they are completely controlled by the game, and the players. Most other sports either have a time or score limit. Score limits make resigning stupidly as the deficit player can still win, with time it's obligation to play it out. With chess, that's neither.

Jan-12-09  technical draw: <Do the Yankees resign in the 8th inning when they are losing 15-0? NO.>

They would if they could. Resigning is not allowed.

Jan-12-09  TheaN: <They would if they could. Resigning is not allowed.>

And this is true too... I mean, in soccer, when a team is down 6-0 in the 89th minute, they will not be really playing anymore, they just have to... in chess you have the option to resign, and it valid to do so in lost positions. That's no opinion, that's fact.

Jan-13-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: Yes, the Yankees keep playing when behind 15-0, but I bet Jeter, Rodriguez and Damon are long out of the game, and Rivera isn't coming in to pitch.
Jan-13-09  xrt999: <technical draw: <Do the Yankees resign in the 8th inning when they are losing 15-0? NO.> They would if they could. Resigning is not allowed.>

well, I disagree, they would not give up, resign, even if they could. This comment is quite insulting to baseball players in my opinion.

I guess when to resign is up to each player to decide. In this case two players rated ~2500 both miss a mate in 2. Had black resigned before making move 22, he would have missed out on the rest of the game. Had he won, it would have been more evidence of my opinion. He didnt win, but the main thing is that he COULD have won the game, because the game is quite even after move 23. That is why I made the comment about resigning.

On the other hand, black had better moves than 22...Ra7, so the issue is somewhat more difficult to tease out this position.

<TheN: If you are down a Queen and Rook, on the other hand, playing seems more of a torture than a game to win>

I dont ever find myself down a rook and queen, so I am not sure we are talking about the same thing. I am talking about resigning games where the player has a "perceived" disadvantage. Many times here a player might be down a knight, but be up a pawn or 2 [perhaps one of the pawns is passed] and resign, and not one post says....'why did the player resign'?

I never resign these positions. If I ever find myself down a rook and queen, I wouldnt resign, I would give up chess.

Jan-13-09  technical draw: <This comment is quite insulting to baseball players in my opinion.>

A player that's on a team that is losing 15-0 probably wants to get out more than the fans that are streaming out of the stadium. No insult intended.

Jan-13-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: This comparison between chess and other sports is an apples and oranges sort of debate.

In most major sports, "victory" is defined as having the best result at a particular point in time, whether one hour on the clock or 27 outs.

Chess is not like that. Victory is defined as achieving a particular result--checkmating the opponent's king. Being ahead on material after one hour or 27 moves is irrelevant.

That's why baseball players can't "quit" early; they have to play 27 otus, no matter what. Since chess does not have that kind of fixed structure, a player is allowed to concede inevitable defeat. Whether they should is a different question, but it cannot be compared to another sport where playing a certain length of time is required.

Myself, I'm generally a quick resigner, simply because I find playing out lost games to be distasteful and I've got btter things to do with my time. However, the "never resign" philosophy is valid--though I get aggravated with guys who spend five minutes thinking about their only legal move before checkmate.

Jan-13-09  Deus Ex Alekhina: Yes, I can attest to the fact that Phony Benoni is a quick resigner!! In a tournament game against me he called it quits before my seat had a chance to get warm!
Jan-13-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <Deus Ex Alekhina> You'll have to be more specific; I've had a few of those.
Jan-13-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: After all, when you've played in Michigan as much as I have, it happens frequently.
Jan-14-09  Deus Ex Alekhina: The game lasted 7 moves, but you said you had lost shorter ones.
Jan-14-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Actually, seven moves is my record in tournament play, though I once lost a shorter postal game due to a clerical error. Here are those games. I doubt I have to fear them being submitted to the database.

Moody,D (1706) - (1417) [D00]
U.S. Open Chicago, Ill. (4), 01.08.1979

<1.Nc3 Nf6 2.d4 d5 3.e4 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nxe4 5.Bd3 Nf6 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.Bg5 h6 0-1>

(1696) - Moody,D (2049) [D02]
U.S. Open St. Paul, Minn. (7), 15.08.1982

<1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Bg4 3.Ne5 Bh5 4.c4 e6 5.Qb3 dxc4 6.Qxb7 Qxd4 7.Nc6 1-0>

The funny thing is that both times I was paired against and defeated the same player in the next round. After this, I would scan the wall charts at each U.S. Open I attended, and if he hadn't shown up I knew I wouldn't lose another game in seven moves.

Jan-17-09  xrt999: < technical draw: <This comment is quite insulting to baseball players in my opinion.> A player that's on a team that is losing 15-0 probably wants to get out more than the fans that are streaming out of the stadium. No insult intended.>

I realize the point you are trying to make.

I guess if you and I ever play I will just HAVE to bring my queen out and sac it on move 4, then play on for 45 more moves whilst you clench and unclench your fists....then I resign one move away from mate.

In fact, this all started for me last year when I made a comment on Pert vs Ward 2005. I asked why would a player resign in this position, in fact, a player might in fact DESIRE this exact position; all play could have been considered a questionable Tal-like sacrifice. In other words, had Tal played this position, everyone would have been gushing about what a brilliant sacrifice was made.

cheers

Jan-17-09  technical draw: <xrt999> Very strange. What you mention happened to me yesterday at Gameknot. The game is posted on my forum. My opponent waited until one minute was left on his clock to resign. I promptly put him on ignore. I don't like to put players on ignore but this player was on line all the time and he had 2 days to resign. That is poor sportsmanship.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Smothered Mate 23. ? (or 23. Qxf7 Rxf7 24. ?)
from Puzzles for K-5 by ruzon
23. Qxf7+!
from Mate (Mate in 2) by patzer2
rook manouvre
from Chess strategy by isfsam
rook manouvre
from Chess strategy by Del ToRo
23.? (January 6, 2009)
from Tuesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
QGD: Lasker Defense (D56) 1-0 Missed 23.?
from The t_t Players: Staunton, Steinitz & Zukertort by fredthebear
QGD: Lasker Defense (D56) 1-0 Missed 23.?
from 1980s Babes, Booms & Busts Broke Fredthebear by fredthebear
white misses queen sac mate in two
from unique themes :fourth division by kevin86
Chapter 4: Opening Play (Game 49)
from John Emms: Survival Guide to Competitive Chess by nakul1964
Just a test
by f54280
rook manouvre
from Chess strategy by obrit
Chapter 4: Opening Play (Game 49)
from John Emms: Survival Guide to Competitive Chess by nakul1964
Game 48
from Survival Guide to Competitive Chess (Emms) by isfsam
Tues 06.01.2009: 23. Qxf7+ missed
from Tuesday puzzle by ellenliisbet
Chapter 4: Opening Play (Game 49)
from John Emms: Survival Guide to Competitive Chess by cu8sfan
23.? (Tuesday, January 6)
from Puzzle of the Day 2009 by Phony Benoni
23.? (Tuesday, January 6)
from POTD Queen Gambit Declined + Accepted by takchess


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC