chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wang Yue vs Viswanathan Anand
Linares (2009), Linares ESP, rd 11, Mar-03
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Wang Yue/Anand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-03-09  ILikeFruits: first...
yes...
ahhh.....
Mar-03-09  I Like Fish: second...
wow...
Mar-03-09  GMNick: Why would Wang take the draw here? It seems to me he can dominate the a-file, or try to open up the kingside for the bishops. The black knights have no where to go.
Mar-03-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  beenthere240: After Qxa1, all black has to do is play Kh8, then Ng8-h6-f7-d8-b7-a5-and b3+!!! picking up the queen. Practically a forced win. Look for it next sunday.
Mar-03-09  shortsight: <beenthere240> yeah, with a 7 moves odds! Actually in between, White plays the stunner Bc2! a few moves earlier in anticipating Black's Nb3+. With this, Anand actually loses a piece, yay!
Mar-03-09  LivBlockade: <GMNick> White's Bishops are no better than Black's Knights. If Black wants to, he can play ...h4 and the position is locked up. The a-file won't be worth much, and the Kings and minor pieces won't be able to penetrate.
Mar-03-09  Aspirador: I also don't understand the draw here. I think there is still a lot of play. Anand said after the game that there is no play left in the position after white played e3-e4. But maybe he just says that to have an excuse for Rentero as to why he didn't continue. There is a video here:

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...

he says after e3-e4, the position is completely "world", or maybe I'm just not understanding what he says on this video.

Mar-04-09  anandrulez: He says its "walled" after f4 which means , both sides cant progress . With the exchange of another rook the position is drawn . In fact early on , Anand says that Wang Yue could have played e4 worried about some sacrifices on the e file . He should have delayed and played with slight plus. Once Vishy did f4 he has achieved a close position and a draw atleast.
Mar-04-09  anandrulez: Aspirador , maybe its the Indian accent ?
Mar-04-09  Aspirador: I was aware that Anand has an Indian accent. :)

Yeah "walled" makes sense. Maybe I didn't understand because I never heard this term in the context of chess.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC