Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Gata Kamsky vs Vladimir Kramnik
Amber Tournament (Blindfold) (2009) (blindfold), Nice FRA, rd 6, Mar-20
King's Indian Attack: Yugoslav Variation (A07)  ·  1/2-1/2


explore this opening
find similar games 27 more Kamsky/Kramnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Kamsky squeezes and squeezes, only to learn that Kramnik is no lemon.
Mar-20-09  Open Defence: so Kramnik is solid again
Mar-20-09  percyblakeney: If Kamsky never had to play anyone else than Kramnik and Anand he would at the very least look like a top five player. I doubt that there is any other player that seems to be on such a totally different level against them as compared to when he plays against for example Topalov and Radjabov.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: Position after 69.fxe5:

click for larger view

According to the tablebases, Kramnik actually made a mistake right at the beginning of this rook endgame with 69...Ra5? (instead of moving the rook along the d file) which allows White a win with best play; Kamsky, however, lost the thread almost immediately with 71.Re7? (instead of Rd7/c7), and after that Kramnik defended impeccably, finding several "only moves" along the way.

Mar-21-09  percyblakeney: <Kamsky, however, lost the thread almost immediately with 71.Re7? (instead of Rd7/c7)>

Yep, according to the tablebases Kamsky had a mate in 35 with 71. Rd7 (and in 36 with Rc7), but those tablebase wins aren't easy to find even when it isn't blindfold.

Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <Eyal: <69...Ra5? (instead of moving the rook along the d file)>> Actually 69...Rd6/Rd7/Rd8 are losing, too. :D
Mar-21-09  visayanbraindoctor: <whiteshark: <Eyal: <69...Ra5? (instead of moving the rook along the d file)>> Actually 69...Rd6/Rd7/Rd8 are losing, too>

How about 69...Rd1, so as to harass the white King from behind with checks? Isn't the drawing principle: once the attacking side places his King on the 5th rank, place your rook somewhere behind the passed pawn? Don't have a table base, so maybe some one can definitively answer.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: Yeah, 69...Rd1 draws (as do Rd2/d3/d4).
Mar-21-09  OneArmedScissor: Kramnik is one of the greatest players of all times.
May-05-09  YoungEd: Jinkies! This must have been one exhausting game for both players!
May-05-09  Vincere: wasn't 103. e7 better?

Ex. 103. e7 Kf7 (to attack e8 with both the king and the rook) 104. Rb7 Rg8 105. Rb4 Rh8 106. Rf4+ Kg7 107. e8=Q Rxe8 108. Kxe8

May-05-09  Everett: <percyblakenly> Another example of how styles and personalities create great match-ups, and why it is silly to think that one player is greater than <all> the others, when there has always been someone, head to head, just as good or better. Fascinating.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: BLINDFOLD. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
96b_The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 2
by whiteshark
Rook + pawn vs. rook
from Instructive chess endgames I by Jaredfchess
Rook + pawn vs. rook
from Instructive chess endgames I by wwall

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC