chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Nigel Short vs Ni Hua
London Chess Classic (2009), London ENG, rd 4, Dec-12
French Defense: Classical. Burn Variation (C11)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Short/Ni Hua games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-12-09  Ulhumbrus: Perhaps Short wants to set his opponent an exam upon the subject of related squares
Dec-12-09  ajile: wait maybe not

lol

Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <related squares> Please, "conjugate" squares is the accepted term. ;-)
Dec-12-09  ajile: ..Ke6
Dec-12-09  ajile: geez

draw

Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: < Sneaky: <related squares> Please, "conjugate" squares is the accepted term. ;-) > Corresponding squares. (They are literate.)
Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: There wasn't even the slightest difficulty in this pawn endgame. It could have been fun if there had been a bunch of those "corresponding squares"...
Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: According to my tablebase Hua just blundered because 54...Kd6 = while 54...Kd5? allows 55.Kd3! with mate-in-24.
Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: White was playing for the trap 51. Kc2 Kc4 52. Kb2 Kd3?? 53. Kb3:


click for larger view

Now the Black King must move away, then 54. c4 wins. Even in this line, 52 ... Kd5 draws.

Short must be playing to the audience. =)

Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: I'm sorry I retract that, I think I was looking at a position that never occurred.
Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  chessgames.com: Thanks one more time for stopping by; we hope to see you all back Sunday morning at 9:00am (USA/Eastern) for round #5. Bye now!
Dec-12-09  LouLou: <Sneaky> 55.Kd3?? The king is already on d3!
Dec-12-09  ajile: I think we all got the Short end of the stick in this game.
Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: LouLou, I know, see previous retraction. I was hopelessly confused. Nobody blundered; it was a tough fought game and a draw was the inevitable result.
Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Marmot PFL: The way they are scoring this tournament white should get 2 points.
Dec-12-09  dakgootje: I think Short just had the Over 60-moves with his personal bookie (of course, the latter doesn't know his clients identity)
Dec-12-09  Ulhumbrus: <tpstar:

...Short must be playing to the audience.> Short could have decided to give a lesson to the younger members of his audience, by showing them how the ending was drawn.

Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <Ulhumbrus> I think Ni Hua was the one showing how this K&P endgame was drawn. =)

Once Black avoided the ... Kc4/... Kd3?? line which was White's only hope, it was time to draw. Then they can both teach students about endgame technique in the post mortem. I find it disrespectful making another GM play this out to stalemate.

Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Is Nigel being paid by the move, in this event?
Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <I find it disrespectful making another GM play this out to stalemate.> I don't. It's completely the players' prerogative whether or not to play it out. Like tpstar said, now they have some material for student lectures. Just think of all the times you look up some ending on Chessgames like a Bishop+Knight mate and you think "darn, why didn't they play it out to the end?" But once in a while two of them really do play it out, and the result is instructional. It's not a question of hoping that the guy's cellphone goes off, or that he runs out of time, or that he touches the wrong piece--it's just for the beauty of the game.
Dec-12-09  JG27Pyth: Are you kidding? -- there's got to be some side story here -- I'd have been surprised to see Class A players play this out to the end.

Was this disrespect, or comedy, or what?

Dec-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: It happens all the time, haven't you seen GM games end where both sides have nothing but naked kings? E.g. Leko vs Kramnik, 2004. No side-story, no time-pressure, just the whimsy of the players on that particular day.
Dec-12-09  Dredge Rivers: Another freaking draw! What's the deal?
Dec-13-09  ajile: So the advance (e5) french is no longer in style? How does White get any advantage in this variation?
Dec-13-09  jon01: This endgame that occurs after 48. ...b5 is almost identical to Timman vs Yusupov, 1994. It shows the power of opposition and it's essential knowledge for every chess player.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Greatest Hits Vol 1
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC