Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Leonard William Barden vs Weaver Warren Adams
Hastings (1950/51), Hastings ENG, rd 3, Dec-??
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense. Lolli Attack (C57)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 196 more games of W Adams
sac: 8.Nxf7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-09-10  Helios727: Barden's favorite win according to Wikipedia.
Mar-06-10  Cibator: Yes; according to Barden himself, White's 10th was a TN that refuted an entire line given in Adams's book "White to Play and Win".
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Barden was analsying the opening with some friends at Oxford University when P Keffler suggested 10.♕e4!, threatening 0-0, f4 & fe5 with a winning attack.

The idea of 6...♗b4+ was to deny a White knight access to c3 after 7.c3.

Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: "At my first Hastings in 1950/51 I played Weaver Adams, the guy who believed White could play and win. In the new edition of his book he'd written about the Fried Liver Attack in the Two Knights' Defence. I followed the book against him, I got a tremendous attack, I smashed him up, then I told him I had his book."

- Leonard William Barden

Source: Curse of Kirsan by Sarah Hurst

Premium Chessgames Member
  ketchuplover: RIP Peter Keffler
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: "(Peter Keffler) made his discovery of 10 Qe4! in the Two Knights when we were analysing the defence in the train on the way back from a county match. As is known, I used Peter Keffler's innovation against the then US Open champion Weaver Adams at Hastings 1950-51. Adams's book White to Play and Win had only considered Qg4-f3+ with perpetual. When I bashed out 10 Qe4 and then immediately left the board for effect Weaver stared up at the ceiling and didn't reply for 20 minutes.

Peter was a fine tactician....a gentlemanly and effervescent character who was one of the most popular members of the Oxford university and county teams in 1950."

<Leonard Barden> ECF Forum.

Dec-20-16  Retireborn: Can Mr Barden (or anybody else) confirm whether this famous 3rd round game was played in 1950 or 1951? I think it's possible that it was just the first two rounds played in the old year then. TIA for any information.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: The first round was played on the 28th of December (BritBase, Dutch newspaper Algemeen Handelsblad). So the third round was definitely played in 1950, probably on the 30st.
Dec-20-16  Paarhufer: The Times published several reports having a date within the header different from the publishing date.

Header / publishing date / results of round:
Dec-28 / Dec-29 / rd 1
Dec-29 / Dec-30 / rd 2 (and 1)
Dec-31 / Jan-01 / rd 3
Jan-01 / Jan-02 / rd 4
Jan-02 / Jan-03 / rd 5
Jan-03 / Jan-04 / rd 6
Jan-04 / Jan-05 / rd 7
Jan-07 / Jan-08 / rd 9

Dec-20-16  Retireborn: <Paarhufer/Stonehenge> Many thanks for your help, much appreciated.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
a lolli with interesting complications
from Two Knight Games Study: Without Na5 lines by tak traxler
6...Bb4+ 7.c3
from Lolli Attack (Two Knights 5...Nxd5 6.d4) by BabalooMoon
a lolli with interesting complications
from Two Knight Games Study: Without Na5 lines by takchess
Game 9
from Greatest Tricks and Traps (Lane) by Qindarka
Round Three
from Hastings 1950/51 by suenteus po 147

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC