Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Pierre Charles Fournier de Saint Amant vs Lionel Adalbert Bagration Felix Kieseritzky
Paris (1840), Paris FRA, Feb-02
Italian Game: Classical Variation. Center Attack (C53)  ·  0-1


explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Saint Amant/Kieseritzky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
May-11-12  AVRO38: After 33.Qxa7 Qxe6 34.Rxd3 Black has nothing.
May-11-12  Octal: Doesn't white still have some drawing chances in the final position? Assuming he doesn't trade rooks, and also assuming that he just resigned here instead of playing on and we have no documentation of the rest of the game.
May-11-12  AVRO38: Although Black has more chances after 33.Qd7, the win is not at all clear. I suspect the game score is wrong or perhaps the game was abandoned for some reason.
May-12-12  thomastonk: <Octal> The final position is a clear draw because White wins one of Black's queen side pawns by 36. Rd5.

<AVRO38> According to my database of ancient games, the game has been published three times with the given game score, and once with a completely different finish, departing with 31.. a6.

Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: The game is given in Le Palamède, v4, 1839, pp88-89, and ends with: <Cette partie a eu encore plusieurs coups insignifiants, elle devait être remise, elle a été perdue par une faute de la part des blancs.>
May-12-12  AVRO38: <thomastonk><The final position is a clear draw because White wins one of Black's queen side pawns by 36. Rd5.>

No question about that. The point is that Black has some play due to his more advanced pawns and king, not enough to win against best play, but White's job is more difficult. For example, after 36...Ke6 37.Rxb5 Rxd7 38.Ra5 g5 White has to be very careful. After 33.Qxa7 however, the path to a draw is much easier.

Mar-26-17  williamschill: I wonder if White rejected 7.Bd5 worrying about 7..Nxf2?!
Mar-26-17  Duracell: He rejected that because it is a non-development move, and that 7...f5 keeps the Knight into play. Besides, 7...Nxf2?! is a bad sacrifice, even if it has miraculously worked (after some White's bad moves) in the famous Hoffman-Petrov available here: F A Hoffmann vs A Petrov, 1844
Mar-26-17  Duracell: Holy correction, Batman!
7...Nxf2 is the only move that holds somewhat the game according to engines. But still White has an edge.
Jun-20-17  sneaky pete: I found a (secondary) source with the alternate score mentioned by <thomastonk>.

31 ..a6

click for larger view

32.Qe7 Rf8 33.Re1 Qd8 34.Qa7 Qh4 35.Rd1 Qe4 36.Qxa6 Qe2 37.Rf1 Re8 38.Qb6 d3 39.Qxb5 Qe3+ 40.Kh1 Rxe6 41.Qb8+ Kf7 42.Qf4(?) Qxf4 43.Rxf4 d2 44.Rd4 Re1+

click for larger view

White resigns.

This score looks more likely to me than what we have here. I think <Le Palamède> messed up. Possibly their reporter Méry lost interest, thinking the game would end in a draw, started drinking and was unable to reconstruct the right final moves afterwards.

It's just a theory. I'm not saying that Méry was a drunkard, but he was a poet. And black played ... d3, .. Rf8 and ... Kf7 at some point, so he had at least that part right.

Premium Chessgames Member
  mifralu: <Cinquante parties jouées au cercle des échecs et au café de la Régence / recueillies par L. Kieseritzky, 1846,p.42-43>

has the same score mentioned by <sneaky pete> except for White's 40th move, here <Kh2>

The Date given is February 2, 1840

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sargon: Game score has been updated to comport with that given in the link by <mifralu> and suggested by <sneaky pete>, with the replaced moves noted in the annotation at the end...
Jan-13-18  sneaky pete: If white had really played 40.Kh2 .. as shown in that <Cinquante parties> link, he could have tried 45.Rxd2 .. instead of resigning (and black might have played 43... Rd6).

Page 42 seems to end the game with 43.Rxf4 .. and note 10 (by Lewis) is cut off. I'd like to see page 43 of that <Fifty Games>.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
The game is given in Le Palamède, v4, 1839, pp88-89
from Short games by masters by rbaglini
The game is given in Le Palamède, v4, 1839, pp88-89
from yPublished Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source by fredthebear
The game is given in Le Palamède, v4, 1839, pp88-89
from K Players of Yesteryear by fredthebear

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC