chessgames.com

Vladimir Kramnik vs Viswanathan Anand
Bilbao Masters (2010)  ·  Queen's Gambit Declined: Vienna Variation (D39)  ·  1/2-1/2
To move:
Last move:

explore this opening
find similar games 160 more Anand/Kramnik games
PGN: download | view Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If Java is not installed or isn't working, a small red "X" usually appears where the game should be. Most Java problems can be resolved by downloading and (re)installing Java from www.java.com.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  SatelliteDan: Oct-14-10
<SetNoEscapeOn: A really tough position for Vishy to be in, playing with black when Kramnik would be content for a draw.> Really agree, lol.
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Is this a Queen's Gambit Accepted by transposition, or would this be considered a Ragozin system?
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Robin01: And what opening have they gone into today?
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Chessgames just labeled it a Queen's Gambit Declined but I think their opening identifier is less than perfect. This looks just like any number of games that start 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4.
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Even the Opening Explorer is confused: it says it's a QGA, a QGD, or a Ragozin, depending on which way the wind blows.
Oct-14-10  ughaibu: It's a queens gambit Vienna variation, whether that's accepted or declined has never been a question I've considered. Considering it now. . . . . well. . . .
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ulhumbrus: Instead of either 14 a3 or 15 Kh1, 14 Qe2 or 15 Qe2 connects the Rooks.
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: After 13.O-O the database has four examples (http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...) including Kramnik vs Lautier, 1998 (1-0).

Looking at those games with (+3 -0 =1) you'd think White has a distinct advantage but I think it's a statistical fluke. This is pretty dry stuff. If there is to be a tussle it will come in the ending.

Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: Wow, Anand came prepared. Looks like unused Bonn prep.

15. Kh1 is new to the database = Opening Explorer

Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: What's the compensation for giving up the BB pair?
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Kh1 looks pretty aggressive to me.
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Strongest Force: Do Kram know what to do with an aggressive position?
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ulhumbrus: <whiteshark: What's the compensation for giving up the pair?> Perhaps he hopes to establish a N on a strong square and so reduce White's advantage.

One of the advantages which the bishop pair confers upon a player is that he enjoys then much greater liberty to advance his pawns on either wing without undue risk of losing the game, whereas it could be suicidal to do this when facing an opponent's bishop pair.

This suggests the following question: If Kramnik plays f5 now and threatens a King side pawn storm by g4 and g5, how is Anand going to answer the threat?

Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: < whiteshark: What's the compensation for giving up the BB pair?>

Not much. Black position is fairly solid and he can massage the Pe4. That is about it. In contrast, Black K-side is cramped and will be hard to defend. Opening of the center would be in White favor because of the 2B. All in all, Black seems to be destined for a long grim defense...

Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  ketchuplover: I thought 18.fxe5 was better.
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Strongest Force: I say Kram does not have the balls to go for a pawn storm
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <All in all, Black seems to be destined for a long grim defense...>

He can be spared of it by well timed draw offer....:-o

Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: Black may plan to re-route his LSB on the h1-a8 diagonal to apply pressure on the e4 pawn. Maybe put his other rook on c8. What to do with the QN? maybe d4.
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fiberking: Hello all. Good to be back. I like Kramnik's position here, but Anand's 19...b6 seems a strong defence move. I do not see a king side pawn storm coming, for that would be as risky for white as it would be for black. All in all, a small plus for Kramnik, imho.
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Just optically without sillicon support I would say that white has some edge here.
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ulhumbrus: Here is one way for Black to lose after 20 g4 instead of 20 Nd2: 20 g4 Be8 21 g5 Nd7 22 g6 hg 23 fg fg 24 Bc4+ Kh8 25 Qg4 Nf6 26 Qh3+ Nh7 27 Rf3 Qg5 28 Rf8 mate
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Honza Cervenka: <All in all, Black seems to be destined for a long grim defense...>

He can be spared of it by well timed draw offer....:-o>

Lol.

(Given the state of the tournament, it may work though. ;-))

Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Frankovich: Bishop on a8-h1 diagonal seems to be Anand's specialty with black the last few years.
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ulhumbrus: If the pawn storm 20 g4 and 21 g5 leads to a win, which it may or may not do, Kramnik may have let a winning advantage slip by spending two tempi on the two knight moves 20 Nb3-d2 and 21 Nd2-f3.
Oct-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: <Ulhumbrus> Yes, that knight's made quite the journey: g1-f3-d4-b3-d2-f3. Should have just stayed on f3 ;)
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies