chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Etienne Bacrot vs Vugar Gashimov
Nanjing Pearl Spring Tournament (2010), Nanjing CHN, rd 8, Oct-28
Slav Defense: General (D10)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Bacrot/V Gashimov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-28-10  play2win: Is this a joke?
Oct-28-10  Eyal: <Is this a joke?>

Maybe - but I have to say it was funnier the first time:

J Gustafsson vs Bacrot, 2010

Oct-28-10  whiteshark: Is it just me, or is the position really begging for a draw?
Oct-28-10  supertimchan: They may as well not come for the play.
Oct-28-10  Landman: Perhaps Bacrot dislikes tournament invitations, and has hit upon an excellent way to discourage them.
Oct-28-10  play2win: That's dissapointing because Bacrot was putting on a very good performance considering people dubbed him "the punching bag" of this tournament. He's in there with the likes of Anand, Carlsen, and Topalov.

Just thought he'd try for a win with the white pieces against one of the "weaker" players in this tourney. No offense meant to Gashimov.

Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: <That's dissapointing because Bacrot was putting on a very good performance considering people dubbed him "the punching bag" of this tournament. >

He still is - one short draw doesn't ruin his performance.

Oct-28-10  play2win: Plang - I'm not suggesting this one draw completely ruins his performance at Nanjing, but that does not change the fact that this particular game is dissapointing, especially when you consider the context. With the white pieces and fighting for a top two finish at Nanjing, I expect better.
Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  SteinitzLives: Gashimov gets the award for "name-most-sounding-like-a-fighter". Bacrot, w/ white must just be tired, but he is having a great tournament. Only Wang Yue, and Topolov have performance ratings below their current playing ratings in this tourney.
Oct-28-10  jmi: if i were the organiser and shelling out so much moolah, these 2 people would be off my list forever with this insipid performance.
Oct-28-10  whiteshark: http://l0rdshrek.info/bilderhoster/...
Oct-28-10  Illogic: Certainly no surprises in the opening, so no excuse for Bacrot to do this, really. Maybe upset over his loss to Topalov the day before.
Oct-28-10  Kazzak: So, Bacrot manages to get me enthusiastic about him again. "Hey, Bacrot's got a second wind. I'll follow him with more attention now."

Pffft.

Oct-28-10  parisattack: <jmi: if i were the organiser and shelling out so much moolah, these 2 people would be off my list forever with this insipid performance.>

I have to agree! The way to discourage short non-fighting games is for those who put up the $$$ to simply say 'No' to players who engage in them. Money talks and I believe if there was a move in that directions the players would get the drift soon enough.

Oct-28-10  melianis: If Bacrot had some opening preparation done, Gashimov didn't have any of it.
Oct-29-10  Eyal: Bacrot himself apparently explained what has happened here in a need to recover after his frustrating loss to Topalov in the previous round: <He admitted that the 14-move draw against Gashimov was directly related to his unnecessary loss against Topalov the round before. "It is very difficult to play after such a blunder. I am not strong enough, it's different for these top guys who play tournament after tournament," Bacrot said.> (http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/c...)
Oct-29-10  Landman: Bacrot's approach is very understandable - I think most tournament players can empathize. Unfortunately, it will hurt his future high-level tournament invitations. Playing strongly after an embarrassing loss is quite difficult. It's a valuable skill for any player - especially professionals.
Oct-29-10  Eyal: <Playing strongly after an embarrassing loss is quite difficult. It's a valuable skill for any player - especially professionals.>

I remember how, three years ago, Bacrot totally collapsed during his candidates match with Kamsky after flagging game no. 2 in an equal position (Candidates Match: Bacrot-Kamsky (2007)). Mig Greengard wrote then: <Kamsky shows that he still has the killer instinct and Bacrot shows that he has, well, whatever the opposite of killer instinct is. What squirrels have.>

Oct-29-10  Landman: Which grandmasters have historically been "fired up" after a bad loss? Kamsky definitely comes to mind, as does Kasparov (see the 1995 Anand match). Probably Fischer and Carlsen also.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC