< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·
|Jun-06-14|| ||Benzol: No <Conrad> I mean Maehrisch - Ostrau (1923) which YOU thought was a game and later found out was a tournament. And if you memory of it is that feeble take the time to refresh it. You might just find it an enlightening experience!|
|Jun-06-14|| ||Conrad93: My comments are nowhere on that page.|
|Jun-06-14|| ||Benzol: <Conrad> Cast your mind back to some comments you made on the Lasker page. It actually started on page 64 of this thread but use
Emanuel Lasker as a reference point. And your comments and mine on page 43 of the Yifan Hou thread might also jog your memory.|
|Jun-06-14|| ||Conrad93: I never thought it was a game, and none of my comments verify what you have claimed.|
|Jun-06-14|| ||Benzol: <Conrad93: Jim, I was referring to the game posted, not the tournament.> Then what were you referring to?|
|Jun-07-14|| ||Benzol: <Conrad93> There is now an Id Monster on your trail. Beware!|
|Jun-07-14|| ||Conrad93: IF I said that, why do you assume I mean the tournament?|
I was obviously referring to a game.
|Jun-07-14|| ||N0B0DY: Of course, <N0B0DY> could have possibly predicted that flimsy argument.|
|Jun-07-14|| ||Benzol: <Conrad> You DID say that and the post you referred to was about the Maehrisch - Ostrau (1923) tournament. QED.|
|Jun-07-14|| ||Gregor Samsa Mendel: <Conrad93: I will never accept that I am wrong. It's not in my nature.>|
Alekhine vs Euwe, 1935
|Jun-07-14|| ||perfidious: <GSM> Guess we can't say we weren't warned......not sure what to do in the presence of his staggering stupidity.|
|Jun-07-14|| ||Benzol: <Conrad> and <AJ> having a "discussion" could be very entertaining.|
|Jun-07-14|| ||perfidious: One could merely stand in awe as that pair duked it out in the fleshpots of Pensuckola.|
|Apr-06-15|| ||apj: What happens after 23. f3? Attacking the queen, then knight can be captured and white would be a pawn up. Isn't the game still playable for white?|
|Apr-06-15|| ||Gilmoy: <apj: 23.f3> Nc4 with <mutual threat> to both Qs. Meanwhile Be3 is also hanging and doubled, so ducking the Q trade simply drops another piece. But after the Q trade 24.fxg4 Nxb2, now Rd1 and Be3 are both attacked, and after 25.Re1 <move one to save the other> Bxc3 causes more pain. And White can't even counterattack the Nb2 because the same Bxc3 defends it.|
And White is already down the Ng5 he never got back.
|Jun-17-15|| ||Conrad93: At least I'm not Perfidious. He reeks of arrogance and narcissism.|
I would rather be in the presence of a humble idiot than a boasting know-it-all.
|Jun-17-15|| ||john barleycorn: <Conrad93: At least I'm not Perfidious....>|
Everybody knows. <perfidious> knows a thing or two about chess. In particular, the enpassant rule.
|Jun-17-15|| ||perfidious: Yeah, but Ah caint count the number o' them there squares ta make a queen!|
|Jun-18-15|| ||Abdel Irada: In <Conrad93> we find the worst of both worlds: a boasting idiot.|
Wonder if he's ever heard that old saw, "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."
|Jun-18-15|| ||perfidious: <Abdel Irada> Why read of suvh aphorisms when one can live them?|
|Jun-18-15|| ||Conrad93: <Everybody knows. <perfidious> knows a thing or two about chess. In particular, the enpassant rule.>|
I would smoke Perfidious in a game of chess. He pretends to know more than he actually does.
|Jun-18-15|| ||perfidious: Ah'll tell yew what, Ah is a lahfe 1200 playah!
Is that better'n bein' <donkrad>?
|Dec-20-15|| ||scholes: giri seems to have ability to provoke even the most solid players to enter into tactical melee|
|Apr-29-17|| ||ZackyMuhammad: What after Qg4? How Carlsen lose here?|
|Jun-08-17|| ||DarthStapler: He's down a piece and he can't take the knight on b6 and defend his rook on d1 at the same time. He has to protect his rook, then the knight can escape.|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·