chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Charles Fisher vs John Pendrill
NSW v VIC Telegraph Match (1870), Australia, Nov-09
Owen Defense: General (B00)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 46 more games of C Fisher
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-13-13  optimal play: This game was played on Board 7 (out of 7) in the telegraph match between New South Wales and Victoria on 9th November 1870 with seven players on each team playing from Sydney & Melbourne.

<<<NOTES.>

(a) 4...f5

Throwing away a pawn absolutely for nothing at the fourth move of a match game.

(b) 5...Nf6

Too late, Black sees that the capture of the K Kt P is ruinous, and that B to Q Kt ch first, leads to no better result, though the latter would perhaps have been worth a trial.

(c) 9...O-O-O

Very dangerous in such a position.

(d) 16...Ng4

Blacks plays nervously and far below his usual mark in this game.

The rest of the game is quite unworthy of publication, were it not to show the position in which the dispute arose.

* 22...Bc8

Mr. Fisher here moved the K B to K B sq, which will explain the subsequent moves on his part.

(e) 27...Bxf5

On the announcement of Black's twenty-seventh move to his Victorian antagonist, and the discovery of the error that had been made by Mr. Fisher, in not correctly playing Black's twenty-second move, though correctly received by him, the Victorian committee claimed that the moves should be retraced from the twenty-second, where the error arose. This, the New South Wales committee thought contrary to the rules of the match; hence the dispute, which, at the suggestion of the Victorian committee, has been referred to his Honor Judge Francis to decide.>

- Australian Town and Country Journal (NSW) issue Saturday 19 November 1870>

* What apparently happened was that Pendrill played 22...B-QB1 (22...♗c8) which was correctly telegraphed from Sydney to Melbourne, but Fisher mistakenly moved the wrong bishop, playing 22...B-KB1 (22...♗f8) and continued play with the wrong position on the board until black's 27th move when the mistake was made clear and the game then had to be adjourned.

<<The result of the match was that Victoria scored games 1, 2 and 3 ; New South Wales scored game No. 4. Games Nos. 5 and 6 were drawn, and No. 7 terminated in a dispute, which it has been agreed to refer to Judge Francis.>

- Australian Town and Country Journal (NSW) issue Saturday 12 November 1870>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC