Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Luke McShane vs Vlastimil Jansa
12th European Individual Championship (2011), Aix-les-Bains FRA, rd 6, Mar-27
Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation (A01)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 3 times; par: 54 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2,012 more games of Jansa
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-27-11  Bratek: I am impressed with McShane.He shows that you can play quite new opening moves and reach a good,playable position!
Mar-27-11  rummywork: What's wrong with Jansa's 7...Nxg4.
Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: I imagine Jansa must have been sorely tempted to play 6...Nxg4. At the end 37...Nxg6 would be met with 38.Rxg6 fxg6 39.Ng5 and mate is unavoidable.
Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: Rummywork, you must mean 6...Nxg4 -- by the time White has played 7.Nc3-e2 he can answer any Qh4+ with Ng3. I think that after 6...Nxg4 White would play 7.Bb5+ and after 7...c6 8.fxg4 Qh4+ 9.Kf1 Bxg4 10.Be2 it's not clear if Black has full compensation for the piece.
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: nimzowitsch wd have loved this game-its a bit reminiscent of a game nimzo won v grunfeld-play on both wings-nailing the black king-no castling by white and in one of Nimzos favourite openings-great!!
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: Nimzowitsch vs Gruenfeld, 1925 this is the nimzo win v gruenfeld which i had in mind-it even features the thrust g6!!
Mar-28-11  SvetlanaBabe: If Jansa did play 6...Ng4!? he would have won quickly. McShane's style is one of a gutless pawn pusher (albeit very good at it) Dime a dozen, really. Any coffee house tactician would have played this and probably won.
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: A "gutless pawn pusher" probably would not have played 1.b3, nor 6.g4.
Mar-28-11  pawn to QB4: Ah well, at least Svetlana let Luke off more lightly than poor old Angelo Tsagarakis <'Slag-arakis'the most obese chessplayer in Australian history. Probably best known for running the Melbourne Chess Club into the ground. A truly ugly person in every way.> Given the accuracy of the comment on McShane, Tsagarakis is probably slim, handsome and a brilliant organiser.
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: She's a real ray of sunshine all right.
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <SvetlanaBabe: If Jansa did play 6...Ng4!? he would have won quickly. McShane's style is one of a gutless pawn pusher (albeit very good at it) Dime a dozen, really. Any coffee house tactician would have played this and probably won.>

Come again?

This bit of arrant nonsense is almost as funny as some of the flights of fancy indulged in by a particularly notorious kibitzer on this site, who likely would have destroyed McShane in short order for his impudence in the opening phase.

Pity that He Who Sees All won't read this, being as I am on his immensely long ignore-list.

I have little doubt that Svetlana will soon be giving simultaneous displays vs 2650+ GMs and rolling them up with contemptuous ease, making the likes of Fischer, Kasparov and Lasker look like mere woodpushers.

Mar-30-11  Nezhmetdinov: Mcshane!! Mcshane!! I always knew he'd come good. 1.b3! A stalemated black Queen (in true counterpoint to white's irrepressible madam)! A pawn provides the denouement! This is a win to warm the cockles of even the most curmudgeonly... eh? Oh...
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: What an opening! What a game!
Mar-31-11  Atking: <rummywork: What's wrong with Jansa's 7...Nxg4.> I should miss something obvious 8.fxN Qh4+ 9.Ke2 Bxg4 10.Nf3 and 10...e5 11.d3, or 10...Nc6 11.Bg2 then? I like too McShane philosophy... A flexible mind made 6.g4 working to the final touch 37.g6!
Mar-31-11  OrigamiArtist: <Atking> just to clarify, <luzhin> already refuted 6...Nxg4? with 7.Bb5+! Check his post; it is pretty obvious that after those moves white is on the path to victory.
Mar-31-11  Atking: Ok <OrigamiArtist> I simply didn't get the point of <rummywork>. Maybe there is not.
Apr-02-11  Ulhumbrus: An alternative to 4...e6 is 4...f6 supporting the advance ....e5.

On 6...Nxg4 7 fxg4 Qh4+ 8 Ke2 Bxg4+ 9 Nf3 e5 threatens ...e4

Apr-03-11  Ulhumbrus: On 6...Nxg4 7 Bb5+ Nc6 8 fxg4 Qh4+ 9 Kf1 Bxg4 10 Be2 Bh3+ 11 Nxh3 Qxh3+ 12 Kf2 0-0-0 Black has two pawns and the safer King in return for a piece.
Apr-03-11  goldenbear: I'll agree with <SvetlanaBabe> but add that I wish I were as fine a "gutless pawn pusher" as McShane. Just because she's out of line and borderline offensive doesn't make her wrong. Nxg4 gives good practical chances whatever the "real" evaluation and Bg6 gives excellent chances of a prolonged and tedious defence.
Apr-03-11  goldenbear: Also, if Black didn't like Nxg4, I think a more practical reply to Nce2 would have been the immediate 7.h5 and if 8.g5, then 8.Ng8! 8.Nd7 is more awkward from a practical point of view. If White replies 8.Nf4!?, then hxg4 9.Nxg6 fxg6 10.Bd3 Nh5! 11.Bxg6+ Kd7 leads to a fascinating situation.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
98_A01 Play 1.b3!
by whiteshark
Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical 2...Bg5 3.f3?! (A01) 1-0
from Swede Larsen & Fredthebear were classmates by fredthebear
maestro37's favorite games Nimzo-Larsen Attack
by maestro37

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC