|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 5 OF 6 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Jun-20-11
 | | virginmind: wow, Rxd4, but not that early nisi! |
 |
Jun-20-11
 | | Domdaniel: Ulhumbrus anticipated a Rook offer. |
|
Jun-20-11
 | | Ulhumbrus: Was the exchange sacrifice 26 Rxd4 necessary? Nisipeanu was a pawn ahead and had the bishop pair. It was up to Carlsen to find compensation - if he could. |
|
Jun-20-11
 | | beenthere240: Without the exchange sac, the c pawn was attacked twice -- I think nisi now has no less than a draw with a winning chances. |
|
Jun-20-11
 | | PinnedPiece: On 25..Ne6 Rybka aquarium (chessok) gave this line:
26. axb5 axb5 27. Rxa8 Rxa8 28. Rxd4 Nxd4 29. e6 fxe6 30. c6 Qd5 31. Qxd4 Qxd4 with slight chances for white...but on On 28.Bxd4 Rybka aquarium gives this line:
(28... bxa4 29. Rxa4 a5 30. Ra2 Rad8 31. Be3 Rxe5 32. c6 Rc8 33. Rc2 Re6 34. Bb5 Kf8 35. g3 Ke7 36. Rc4 f6 37. Kg2 g5 38. Kf3 Kd6  ybka Aquarium (0:02:01) +0.13|d19 equal chances) 
click for larger viewClock:
1:20 - 0:30
. |
|
Jun-20-11
 | | lost in space: The clock is Nisi big enemy in this game...from apure positionla point of view a prefere white. More danymic options. |
|
Jun-20-11
| | beenthere240: 30minutes for 12 moves -- I don't think that's a problem. |
|
Jun-20-11
| | virginmind: i really dont think it was necessary. i'm not sure nisi can protect both those 2 advanced pawns - actually, only one. hopefully he calculated well enough... |
|
Jun-20-11
 | | chancho: A 153 point difference.
Could there be an upset looming? |
|
Jun-20-11
 | | Kinghunt: Black is quite okay here. There will be no upset. |
|
Jun-20-11
| | Ulhumbrus: <Domdaniel: Ulhumbrus anticipated a Rook offer.> I'm afraid not, I intended only for Qe2 to attack the b5 pawn, one whose defender might be displaced by the capture axb5 |
|
Jun-20-11
 | | hoodrobin: 3 attacking 2 defending pieces, that's the point (perhaps) |
|
Jun-20-11
| | virginmind: <Ulhumbrus> nah, he jockingly referred to your previous rethoric asking which is better placed (at that time/position) on e4 square, a knight or a rook? :) |
|
Jun-20-11
| | beenthere240: Little chess partner thinks Carlsen is toast. |
|
Jun-20-11
 | | JamesT Kirk: 31.Bb5 /Bc5;32.Bc5 /Rc5;33.Bc4= |
|
Jun-20-11
| | beenthere240: Or maybe the other way around. |
|
Jun-20-11
| | virginmind: <beenthere> no way, fritz 11 sees only a very light adv for white, practically equal. but its true this means white has clear compensation. |
|
Jun-20-11
| | hoodrobin: if carlsen were little chess partner... |
|
Jun-20-11
| | beenthere240: Okay, now I'm getting an even score. No one is toast. |
|
Jun-20-11
| | JamesT Kirk: 31. Rc1...Nisi is too a great fighter!! |
|
Jun-20-11
| | Domdaniel: It's almost certainly a draw, IMO. Black could even exchange one pair of Rooks and give up the other Rook for White's dark square Bishop to reach a drawn ending. But that shouldn't be necessary. *Maybe* Carlsen can squeeze something out of the extra Exchange, but I doubt it. Two Bishops are almost as good as R+B in these positions. |
|
Jun-20-11
| | beenthere240: That's one way of signing a peace treaty! |
|
Jun-20-11
| | chancho: Draw agreed. |
|
Jun-20-11
| | Domdaniel: They reached that conclusion while I was waffling. |
|
Jun-20-11
| | virginmind: looks quite a position in which both parties can fight - unfortunately for white it's exactly where carlsen has proven his class before. all i hope is they wont draw it soon. |
|
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 5 OF 6 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
