chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Frederic S Anderson vs Weaver Warren Adams
US Open (1941), St. Louis, MO USA, rd 6, Jul-24
Modern Defense: Mongredien Defense (B06)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 196 more games of W Adams
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-30-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Winner of the brilliancy prize. Several players were experimenting with double fianchetto defenses at this tournament, but it doesn't seem to fit Adams' style.
Mar-30-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <PB> Are you sure Adams was Black in this tilt? (laughs)

You are quite right: this sort of stuff hardly seemed to be Adams' meat and potatoes, to put it mildly.

Apr-01-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: The writer in "Chess Review" (August/September 1941) did not agree with the choice of this game for the brilliancy prize.

<"Against Anderson the taciturn Bostonian played a weak "Fianchetto Defense", was soundly trounced in 17 moves. This game was awarded the brilliancy prize. Anderson certainly played well. took full advantage of Black's weak opening, but the complete lack of resistance made brilliancy neither necessary nor possible.">

And Matthew Green commenting on the game:

<"This defense has been seen once of twice in the last three decades. It will probably be seen even less in the future.">

To which I can only add that Tournament Director L. Walter Stephens, who donated the prizes, also did the judging. (Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 9/4/1941).

Apr-01-15  Petrosianic: L. Walter Stephens, of course, being the corrupt tournament official who gave a win to Reshevsky a year later, in a game he knew Reshevsky hadn't really won.
Apr-01-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Corrupt is, I think, too strong. Imperious, yes. Incompetent, probably. But everything done with the best of motives.
Apr-01-15  Granny O Doul: What motive? His personal infallibility doctrine? I'd say "corrupt" was a mild choice of adjective.
Apr-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Apparently, we have different ideas of what "corrupt" implies in this situation. To my mind, being "corrupt" would have meant that Stephens ruled against Denker out of personal antagonism or out of favoritism for Reshevsky.

But that appears not to have been the case. Stephens simply made a bad ruling, then refused to even consider the possibility of a mistake. That's a man who is simply out of his depth and too conceited to admit if.

It's interesting that, three rounds before the Reshevsky game, Stephens had made another questionable decision, this time in Denker's favor, even though the latter may have been at fault.

http://fultonhistory.com/Newspaper%...

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Final, Round 6 (Thursday, July 24): ACB 85; CR:150
from US Open 1941, St. Louis by Phony Benoni
Chess Miniatures, Collection XV
by wwall


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC