chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Robin Swinkels vs Leif Erlend Johannessen
"Rockin' Robin" (game of the day Sep-18-2013)
European Club Cup (2011), Rogaska Slatina SLO, rd 6, Sep-30
English Opening: King's English Variation. General (A20)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 551 more games of L E Johannessen
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-25-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Rockin' Robin.
Sep-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Attack from move one. Very impressive.
Sep-18-13  morfishine: Wow, 3 things that stand out from this game: (1) The opponents are actually Grandmasters (2) Black sacs a piece on move 5...Bxf2 & (3) This fluid, lively affair stemmed from an English Opening

Conclusion: White botched the opening

*****

Sep-18-13  Alphastar: Seems like white was continually walking into new nasty surprises; black had a sustained attack right out of the opening.
Sep-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  mjmorri: White's problems stem from the pedestrian 5.Nxe5 expecting to recover the material with 5...Nxe5, 6.d4. Black, however returns the material differently with 5...Bxf2, and White's King is never out of danger.
Sep-18-13  Dezaxa: How much of this do you suppose was preparation on Black's part? Normally, GMs wouldn't engage in mad tactics in the opening unless they had already analysed it.
Sep-18-13  Ratt Boy: I've played this opening as Black (with and without a g3 move by White) quite a number of times. Nobody has ever tried that Nxe5 tactic against me. I don't think the ...Bxf2 tactic would have been so damaging to White if not for the fianchetto. White's K-side is just too loose.
Sep-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: The tactic is well known from games such as Botvinnik vs Keres, 1966 in the Four Knights subvariation; strikes me that, contrary to the implication by <mjmorri>, both players would have been well aware of this motif.
Sep-18-13  sfm: It's really hard to understand some of White's moves. The thing about Nxe5,Bxf2 is well known. Usually it is bad for the player striking at f2(f7) 7.d4 and 8.e4 - OK.
Now it comes:
9.Nxd5
Well, but I have seen Black's reply. So why not 9.cxd5, and the N at c3 keeps an eye on e4. E-file is open. 11.-,Nf6
It is clear now that e4 is a wet dream.
13.Kf1.
Isn't that a pretty move? Since he captures the knight a move later, why not now, so he can go to g2 with the king. 15.h3
What is going on? He chases the night to grab his most important pawn for free, and later there's square on f3. 17.Qb3
Again I have seen what follows. Black intends to play Qe7, g5 and Be6. Natural, easy to see. 21.Rhf1
Aha! It's blitz game between two not-too-strong players.

Actually, I don't know.
Maybe White has a good game, and just blunders?
Before the last move, Black threatens 21.-,Nh4+
On 21.Raf1 can Black still play 21.-,Bxh3+ 22.KxB,Qh5 23.Kg2,Nh4+ 24.gxN,QxN+ 25.Rf2 Hmm, maybe not. Maybe 21.Nd4 is the right move. f3 and f2 is covered. Complicated. Blacks king position is not great either.

Sep-18-13  kevin86: White seemed to sleep through black's attack...first the king was uprooted,then came the horses,then the rest....
Sep-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  scutigera: I concur with <mjmorri> that White's troubles begin with the perfunctory Fork Trick sham sac: 5 Nxe5 expecting 5..Nxe5 6 d4 Bxd4 7 Qxd4 when Black is the one who must worry about his K-side. Black must recapture on move 5 or remain a pawn down, but this unusual way of returning the piece sac before it's made is probably as much a psychological ploy as anything else: if someone opens with c4 and then flanks their KB on move 2, they're probably not looking for a brawl. The rest of the game bears that out.
Sep-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  mjmorri: <perfidious> There are, of course structural differences between this game and the Botvinnik-Keres with Black's pawn on f5 in this game as opposed to Keres placing a Knight on f6. Keres was also unrecognizable in that game and certainly did not play to try take advantage of Botvinnik's King's placement

Perhaps White thought that with the pawn on f5, Black's King's position was looser than his, and he tried to open the center to take advantage of this.

It appears that his method of opening the center and dealing with the aftermath are mostly to blame for the disaster that followed.

Sep-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <scutigera:....this unusual way of returning the piece sac before it's made is probably as much a psychological ploy as anything else: if someone opens with c4 and then flanks their KB on move 2, they're probably not looking for a brawl. The rest of the game bears that out.>

Here is an example of someone playing White who fianchettoed early-as is characteristic of the Reverse Dragon-and might have been said to have been ready for a 'brawl': Botvinnik vs Portisch, 1968.

As the strong master John A Curdo was oft known to say, 'The aggression is in the intent'.

Sep-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: If 22.♔f2 ♘d2 discovered check and the queen is lost. If 22.♔xh3 ♕h5+ 23.♔g2 ♕h2# and the king is lost.
Apr-18-15  kingfu: I think that this should be the King George III English opening.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC