Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

There is a clue unsolved right now on the Holiday Contest Clues Page!   [Official Contest Rules]
Please see this announcement for some updates.
(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Tal Shaked vs Alexander Morozevich
Wch U20 (1997), Zagan POL, rd 12, Jul-26
Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit (D10)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 1,842 more games of Morozevich
sac: 37.Qf2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: This key upset enabled Shaked to win the World Junior Championship. Luckily, Shaked had apparently studied B+N+K v. K, unlike, say, Epishin. R Kempinski vs Epishin, 2001 See Endgame Explorer: BN vs K for more examples.
Feb-06-12  Shams: <FSR> Yeah. White's first four moves in this ending were a strong King move followed by immediately bringing the Knight to f7. Banging out these moves is as good as whispering "I've studied this ending".
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: I think it's the 89. N-d7 move that's hardest to find, unless you really know the B + N mating pattern.
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Indeed. I'm sure after 85.Nf7! and 86.Bh7! Morozevich knew that he was toast.

<HeMateMe> Yes. 88...Kc7 and 89...Kc6 is a well-known escape try, which White should (and did) thwart with 89.Nd7! and 90.Bd3!

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: The Wall of Shame: Endgame Explorer: BN vs K
Feb-07-12  Shams: <Wall of Shame> A classic query!
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: The guys who managed to win <this> ending have my utmost respect: Endgame Explorer: NN vs P Amazingly, Lilienthal got the superior side two or three times (there are two in the database, but I think I've read that it's three), but could only draw each time. He missed wins in both of the two games in the database. I wouldn't have a clue how to even <attempt> to win that monster.
Feb-07-12  Shams: <FSR> The Halley's Comet ending! I memorized the "Troitzky Line" here: (Easily done, because it's so unintuitive-- the knight pawns are the most dangerous?)

I bet you could figure it out over the board. I'd certainly expend a lot of effort, myself.

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Mueller on NN v. P: and
Feb-07-12  Shams: <FSR> Yeesh. On second thought I think I'll save my energies for the next round. =)
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> It would be a good ending to have in a correspondence game, but a nightmare otherwise. Soltis wrote once about having BB v. N in the penultimate round of a Swiss. He wasn't sure if it was a win (it was thought to be a draw at the time, but computers have since shown it to be a win). He decided to try to win it, did so, was exhausted, and got crushed in the last round.

BB v. N is very tough. Endgame Explorer: BB vs N The proper (albeit still losing) defensive technique is seen in P Popovic vs Korchnoi, 1984. The key defensive squares for the knight are, somewhat bizarrely, b7, g7, b2 and g2. Get your knight to one of those squares, with your king adjacent and toward the center (e.g., knight on b7, king on c7 or b6). Stand your ground there as long as possible, and if your opponent succeeds in breaking down that defense, head for another "N2" square to set up the formation there. Timman, with computer assistance at adjournment, succeeded in demonstrating the win in Timman vs Speelman, 1992. Gelfand OTOH couldn't do it: Oll vs Gelfand, 1998

Feb-08-12  King Death: <FSR> The Soltis endgame with B+B vs. N was against this player but the game isn't here: Jean Delva.
Feb-08-12  Shams: <FSR> Good stuff.

You commented the other day that B+N+K vs. Q+K was the worst pair of minors to defend with. Which depressed me since I've had troubles winning that ending against Crafty on

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Don't beat yourself up too much. A 2584 only drew it in D Kosic vs L Lenic, 2008. More generally, see Endgame Explorer: Q vs BN.
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> There is one drawing pattern, but it's very difficult for the inferior side to set it up:

click for larger view

1.Kb1 Kd1 2.Ka1= White leaves his minor pieces in place, and Black's king can't penetrate anywhere.

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> I trust you know that BNNK v. K is sometimes a draw. The conclusion of my immortal study (Black to move):

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Here's a weird result: Z Topel vs N Pares Vives, 2008. Don't know if I believe it.
Feb-09-12  Shams: <FSR> I see that Kosic drew that even with his King in the wrong corner to get the drawing position you mention.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: I played the losing side of the BNK v K endgame in a Nashville City Championship game a couple of years ago. We were down to the last 5-10 minutes of the sudden death part of the game, and my opponent couldn't find the win.

I called the TD to the table to count the moves. Eventually, my opponent flagged and it was therefore a draw. Then I asked the TD how many moves he counted... it was over 70! He reminded me that he could not claim the draw for me at move 50. The player has to claim the draw. I could have asked the TD for his move count on a regular basis, and then claim the draw. An important rule to remember.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
interesting games
by obrit
interesting games
by Jaredfchess
The QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav
by Zhbugnoimt
from 1997 World Junior chess championship by gauer
Shaked wins with B+N to become World Junior Champ
from Games I submitted to by FSR

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC