chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Michael Adams vs Luke McShane
London Chess Classic (2012), London ENG, rd 7, Dec-08
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense (C65)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 14 more Adams/McShane games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 8 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Marmot PFL: Don't need computer here to see the moment has passed for white to win this.
Dec-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: A lost opportunity won't come back in donkey's years
Dec-08-12  Conrad93: What about 75.h4 Rg3 76.Qf5?

Is that drawish?

Dec-08-12  haydn20: What a brilliant defense by Luke until, apparently, 57....Rc3 when Rf1+ might have saved the day. The GM commentators said the position after 48. Qb4 was a grim defensive chore and that Luke could well break down. The decision to play 46. a5! is justified, it seems.
Dec-08-12  Bent Bexley: Adams blows another one. *sigh*
Dec-08-12  Dalex61: Qf7 and the rook is in trouble
Dec-08-12  Conrad93: Why not just push the pawn to h4 and then play Qf4?
Dec-08-12  haydn20: Ugh! I wrote my previous after 62. Qg8+. Just goes to show--you can't draw by resigning.
Dec-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  lost in space: This looks drawish now. I thought white would be able to play h4 and win somehow Pe5. But now it seems white is nothing.
Dec-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tomlinsky: What was 65.Rf8 preparing? It's unlike Adams not to go for the check sequence while he thought things through.
Dec-08-12  Conrad93: 79.Qf4 and black is in zugzwang.
Dec-08-12  Conrad93: Qf4-Rd7-Rd5-Rxd5
Dec-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tomlinsky: Draw *Sigh*
Dec-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Draw agreed!
Dec-08-12  Conrad93: Is this the longest game in the tourney?
Dec-08-12  Edeltalent: Mickey will be kicking himself for missing the win, especially considering the tournament situation. However, it's nice to see Luke come up with half a point this time, as opposed to always be very tenacious but still losing, like in the previous rounds.
Dec-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  chessgames.com: Thanks to everybody for participating in today's live chess broadcasts. We'll be showing the next round at 9:00am USA/Eastern right here, at our Live Broadcast Page, available to everybody--hope to see you then!
Dec-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  lost in space: Draw. Very interesting fighting game. As soon as I don't need my comp for the analyze of other games I will check this game with the help of my silicon friend. I thought that either 57...Rxh3+ or 57...Rf1+ would draw easily?!
Dec-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <chessgames.com> Thank you for todays broadcast and especially this second game! :D
Dec-08-12  scormus: <CG> thanks for the 2 great games, and greatcredit to all 4 players for tremendous fighting play. I still dont know how Luke survived.

<lost in space> glad I wasnt the only one who thought 57 ... Rxh3+ was drawn. Better check it now with the Si

Dec-08-12  Steve.Patzer: I don't see how 65. Qe8 is a crusher. How?
Dec-08-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  me to play: <Steve.Patzer> Not sure if it's all forced but this is one line... 65.Qe8ch Kh7 66.Qh8ch Kg6 67.Qf8 Qe3 68.Qe8ch Kh7 69.Qh8ch Kg6 70.Rd6ch Kh5 71.g4ch
Dec-08-12  Steve.Patzer: I thought 52. Rb1 would win.
Dec-09-12  scormus: <<me to play>Steve.Patzer: I don't see how 65. Qe8 is a crusher. How?>

I tried to see how 65 Qe8 but couldn't, so I wondered if you meant a different Q move. In fact it's Qf8 that kills. I needed the engine to find the whole winning sequence, but the immediate threat of Rd6+ and the prospect of c5 coming up makes it a fairly obvious choice.

But that takes no account of the pressure, the fatigue, the clock situation. Also Micky must have been so focussed on the line he was pursuing it would have been very difficult to make the necessary mental shift.

I feel it is a shame that after pressing so hard for victory and coming so close, he couldn't quite make it over the line. But one should give a lot of credit to Luke, also under massive pressure and for so long. Really, this was great sustained fighting play by both players.

Dec-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: Mickey's 65th was right square, wrong piece! The win was to be found with 65.Qf8! Qe3 (only chance) 66.Qe8+ Kh7 67.Qh8+!! Kg6 68.Rd6+ Kg5 69.g4+ Kh4 70.Rxh6+ (or indeed 70.Qxh6+!) gxh6 71.Qxh6+ and mate next move. The point is that without checking on h8 rather than g8,the decisive double capture on h6 would't be there and it would be White who gets mated! This is incredibly hard to see, especially as both players were short of time.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 8)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 8 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC