chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs Konstantine Shanava
"Shanava Done That" (game of the day Jan-13-2017)
GEO-AZE Friendship (2012), Tbilisi GEO, rd 3, Jun-09
Semi-Slav Defense: Stoltz Variation. Shabalov Attack (D45)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 1,872 more games of Mamedyarov
sac: 19.Qxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-09-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ColeTrane: Shouldnava done that.....
Jan-13-17  razetime: The losing move was Bf5. And then the rampage began.
Jan-13-17  goodevans: I guess <17...Qxd5> is answered with <18.Rxg7+ Kxg7 19.Nf5+>. Right?

<razetime: The losing move was Bf5.> I can't see an alternative to <18...Bf5> that saves black so I think he was already lost by then.

Jan-13-17  Nerwal: 18... ♘xc3 19. ♘xe5 ♗xe5 20. bxc3 ♗e6 may give some drawing chances, at least from the practical point of view. Black has only two bishops for a queen but his position is extremely solid and White has many weak pawns. Even if all the rooks get traded, an endgame ♕ vs 2 ♗ with pawns on one wing may well be drawn.
Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  kdogphs: Windmill attack for the win! My favorite of all tactics.
Jan-13-17  goodevans: <Nerwal: 18... ♘xc3 19. ♘xe5 ♗xe5 20. bxc3 ♗e6 may give some drawing chances...>

In a club game maybe, but these are GMs. Shanava knew that would be hopeless against a super-GM like Shaky.

Jan-13-17  Nerwal: <In a club game maybe, but these are GMs. Shanava knew that would be hopeless against a super-GM like Shaky.>

I am not sure it's a matter of level of play. The line he chose loses quickly in linear fashion so anything is better than this at about any level.

Also the material 2♖ + 2♗ can be surprisingly ressourceful against superior forces, there are plenty of examples in chess history like Adams vs Ivanchuk, 1998 or Boleslavsky vs Botvinnik, 1943. Even the pure endgame ♕ vs 2♗ is very difficult; it took Polugaevsky 25 hours of home analysis to win in Polugaevsky vs Geller, 1968.

Jan-13-17  goodevans: <Nerwal: "I am not sure it's a matter of level of play">

Of course it is. I'm certainly much better at screwing up won positions than Shaky!

In first two examples you gave the material imbalance is never as great as at the end of 18... ♘xc3 19. ♘xe5 ♗xe5 20. bxc3 so I don't think these add weight to your argument.

<"The line he chose loses quickly in linear fashion so anything is better...">

Not <anything>, but I would agree that your line is better. But that's not my point: I never said that <18...Bf5> was the best move, just that it <wasn't the losing move> because the position is already lost. Your line may lose more slowly but I'm convinced it still loses with best play.

Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: 17. Qd3 was extremely tricky, considering that black can take the B on d5 with either the Q or N. If 17...QxB, 18 Rxg7 Kh8 19. Qh7#. Or if 17...QxB, 18 Rxg7 Kxg7, 19. Nf5++ Kg6 20. Nd7++ at least wins back the Q and there's probably a mating net I'm missing. But what's white's plan if 17..NxB?. 18. Rh7 looks messy here because now white can play QxR.
Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <good evans> Sorry, I just saw you already asked about Qxd5 but since the question still hasn't been answered we can hope for more analysis (especially what happens on 17. Nxd5)
Jan-13-17  goodevans: <ChessHigherCat>

No problem.

As for what happens on <17... Nxd5> I'm fairly confident it's <18.Nf3>. ;o)

Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <goodevans> I think 18. Rxg7 looks a lot more forcing (see my analysis two messages above). Do you see anything wrong with it?
Jan-13-17  goodevans: <ChessHigherCat>

18.Rxg7 is, I think, the right response to 17...Qxd5 as per your analysis in your first post. But you also observed that if 17...Nxd5 then it doesn't work the same.

The reason I said I'm confident that white's plan for <17...Nxd5> was <18.Nf3> is that that's what was actually played. ;o)

Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <goodevans> Duhh, I get it:-) I got so hung up analyzing that move that I didn't even think to look ahead at what was actually played
Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  scutigera: <Nerwal>: It's a pretty good combo against equal force, too: Sultan Khan vs Capablanca, 1930
Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Where's <thegoodanarchist> when U knead'm?

*****

Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: The Ole "Wind Mill": We are "Breaking Wind" while the defense is "Milling Around"

Thats a Gas

LOL

*****

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
finally 2Ps up
from 668 windmill (discovered checks) by whiteshark
Shabalov 7...dxc4
by SeazerCZ
Game 3
from 2012-2015 Attacking Games (Naiditsch/Balogh) by Qindarka
Stoltz
from A001 QGD: Semi-Slav [White] by chess.master
Best Attacking games book by Naidistsch
by FLAWLESSWIN64
January 13: "Shanava Done That
from Game of the Day 2017 by Phony Benoni
Volume 16, Game 2
from # Chess Evolution Volumes 1-50 by Qindarka


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC