chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Vassily Ivanchuk vs Alexander Grischuk
FIDE Grand Prix Paris (2013), Elancourt FRA, rd 5, Sep-27
Gruenfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack. Grünfeld Gambit Capablanca Variation (D83)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 53 more Ivanchuk/Grischuk games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-27-13  chessdgc2: boz: yeah, agb2002 pointed out ...Bf1 being shorter. I never saw that move, but it very well may decide this game
Sep-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  agb2002: < chessdgc2: agb2002: Thanks, I missed the ...Bf1 move>

A relatively difficult move: I initially thought the bishop blow would come through the other path.

Sep-27-13  Marmot PFL: Grischuk's first game with black since losing to Fressinet in the Queen's Indian. So maybe he varied the opening for psychological reasons but played very well in any case.
Sep-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: There's always something!
Sep-27-13  chessdgc2: Marmot PFL: But can we base this on Grischuk's "Better" play rather than I-chuk's "Inferior" play?
Sep-27-13  chessdgc2: Whiteshark: But that doesn't mean it's any good :)
Sep-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: Well, this was a tour de force...

Cool-hand Alex.

Sep-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  agb2002: Giri-Bacrot looks interesting.
Sep-27-13  chessdgc2: Gypsy: Yes, 1..Bf1 was such a subtle, but powerful move...I wonder if Chukky ever saw it coming, I suire dind't
Sep-27-13  boz: It's easy to see after 30...Bc4 but not before.
Sep-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <chessdgc2, boz> I just joined the broadcast after the <30...Bc4> was played and was still getting a feel for the position before chiming in with first impression. I just came to a conclusion that White was not altogether healthy; then suddenly, double-take, dancing rook after <31.Nc3 Bf1>.

That <31...Bf1> definitely is an inconspicuous move from a few moves out.

Sep-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: 31...That's why I call a nasty surprise!
Sep-27-13  csmath: Just about the opening.

This is clearly completely anti-positional play with Ivanchuk violating a number of positional principles.

7. c5?!

This move is on the book but it is not played at the top level. The reason is simple - it is anti-positional as creates weak white f2-c5 pawn chain that can be easily attacked at any link.

8. b4?!

In the spirit of previous move and it would only make sense if white would have a time to proceed with queenside action which he cannot.

This is ordinarily how amateurs play, one would not expect this from a player as Ivanchuk. After this move white has no advantage at all and has to play carefully to avoid kingside attack by black.

8. ...Nbd7!?

Standard answer in QG but it temporarily puts black development in awkward disharmony. The problem will be resolved though before white has any chance to exploit it. Immediate 8. ...Nh5 is probably a better move which Grischuk will realize in the next couple of moves.

13. f4?

This is another anti-positional move, obviously in response to previous pawn moves. The score of weaknesses in white position are now glaring. The game is already positionally lost for white and only a serious tactical player could find resources to fight on. Ivanchuk did not.

The only way one can look at these opening is an experiment and not the good one by any stretch of imagination. Typical Ivanchuk that can win a magnificant game and then lose a game without any fight. This inconsistency is the main reason why he has never been and will probably never be a serious contender for WC.

Sep-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: White was utterly unrecognisable in this game-it might well have been played between players of vastly different classes.
Sep-28-13  Ulhumbrus: <boz: It's easy to see after 30...Bc4 but not before.> One lesson which one can learn from this game is that with the Black rook on g8 the manoeuvre ...Be6-c4-f1 becomes a potential threat
Sep-28-13  latvalatvian: Since Ivanchuk is over 1000 points above me, I refuse to criticize his play. Every move he makes seems okay to me. Whatever the result, it doesn't seem to matter.
Sep-28-13  Conrad93: This game makes Ivanchuk look like a 2600+ rated player, which he is not.

It is definitely not a true representation of his strength.

Sep-28-13  LoveThatJoker: I asked Stockfish to solve the final position for me, should White have played 32. g4.

Here is its solution:

32. g4 Nxg4 33. Nxg4 Rxg4+ 34. Kh1 Qg6 35. Qh2 Rh4 36. Rc8+ Kg7 37. Rg8+ Kxg8 mating

LTJ

Sep-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <csmath> You don't know what you're talking about, do you? 'Amateurs' typically *avoid* moves like 7.c5, because they hold on too strongly to classical principles. It takes a strong player like Ivanchuk to play such a move -- it may not have worked out here, but that proves nothing.
Sep-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Ivanchuk was disillusioned with c5 after the game. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IK...

Ivanchuk: "c5 was an unfortunate choice, especially after my loss to Kramnik, it was a bad idea to play such pawn structure."

...Tiviakov: "But very natural, if you can close the center and complete development."

Ivanchuk: "After game against Kramnik it is impossible to play such structures"... Ivanchuk vs Kramnik, 2013 0-1

Grischuk: "But c5 is a very rare move. It was played in Wang Yue and Carlsen and no one has repeated it Wang Yue vs Carlsen, 2009 "But I think it is..., I think if White does not play c5, it's like some forced draws. After c5 some interesting positions"...

Sep-28-13  SoUnwiseTheKnight B4: <Since Ivanchuk is over 1000 points above me,> Yeah me too

<I refuse to criticize his play.> questioning a move or two is allowable

<Every move he makes seems okay to me.> This could magically change overnight if you get yourself an engine!

<Whatever the result, it doesn't seem to matter.> On the contrary, everywhere he goes Ivanchuk is the elephant in the room.

Sep-28-13  csmath: <Ivanchuk: "c5 was an unfortunate choice, especially after my loss to Kramnik, it was a bad idea to play such pawn structure.">

That sums it up nicely. Creating pawn chains is only a solid idea when :

A. you have a space advantage and your opponent has opposing pawn chain. B. ***the position is blocked.***
[As Tiviakov says: <But very natural, if you can close the center and complete development.>]

This is not the case here.

There is no other reason why would a player intend to create a pawn chain. They are always weak, they are always possible to break. Pawn chains are very often in amateur games and fairly rare in master games.

I think if you want to improve your own chess you need to be able to recognize anti-positional features in this game (by white).

Sep-28-13  csmath: By the way, I am 100% sure that Ivanchuk knows this very well and more ... he is even aware of that during the game. Yet, for some reason he plays that!

I think he is probably the only top level GM that does "experimentations" during supertournament play. It has been a major characteristic of his play and he lost many games that way.

Perhaps he simply loves chess and likes to experiment but he gets also very depressed when losing which it seems to be contradictory.

I've seen Peter Svidler playing conceptual experiments sometimes but he does not get so depressed when losing and his "experiments" do make more sense in general.

Both are super-talented and neither will be a world champion. :-)

Sep-29-13  Ulhumbrus: One justification for the move 7 c5 is that Black has obstructed his own e pawn by 6...Be6. The justification does not however have to be sufficient.

It is possible that the move c5 could suffocate Black but for some tiny fatal flaw somewhere, and that Ivanchuk intended some plan which had a flaw, a flaw which he saw too late.

Notice how he replies to 9...Nh5 with 10 Nge2 placing the knight passively but avoiding doubling his f pawn. This suggests 9 h3 instead of 9 Bd3 and this points to the possibility that there was something which Ivanchuk noticed too late.

Oct-11-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Natalia Pogonina: Annotations by GM Naiditsch:
http://www.pogonina.com/index.php?o...
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 7)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Capablanca Variation
from Positional Master Pieces by FLAWLESSWIN64
Volume 84, Game 2
from # Chess Evolution Volumes 51-100 by Qindarka
Trendy Opening Lines quite handy ! part 1
by FLAWLESSWIN64
Game 27
from 2012-2015 Positional Games (Naiditsch/Balogh) by rajeshupadhyay
Game 27
from 2012-2015 Positional Games (Naiditsch/Balogh) by Qindarka


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC