chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Leopold Loewy, Jr. vs Richard Reti
Winter Tt (1908/09), Vienna, Jan-20
Scotch Game: Schmidt Variation (C45)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below.

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more L Loewy Jr/Reti games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
May-18-14  Karpova: This game is from the Winter tournament 1908/09 of the Vienna Chess Club. It was a double round robin, with the first cycle ending at the end of January. The second cycle ended on February 20th. The game was played in the first cycle, on January 20th.

8.Bd3 is the more common reply.

With 9...0-0, the game deviates from the database. 9...a5 was played in Tartakower vs Prins, 1949.

Reti considers <11.O-O-O> best, as White doesn't need to fear <11...Bxe3+ 12.Qxe3 Qb4>.

The annotator awards 12...Rb4 a <?>, suggesting <12...Re8> instead, which would win the ♙-e4 in the future.

The annotator awards 14.Bxc5 a <!>, calling <14.axb4 exd3 15.Bxc5> to get 2 ♖s for the ♕ mistaken due to <15...Qd7! 16.Bxf8? Qd4+ 17.Ke1 Qe3+ 18.Kd1 dxc2+ 19.Kxc2 Bf5+>, but White appears to be fine after 16.Bxd3.

The annotator calls 14...Ng4+ a mistake, which should have lost. Better was <14...Qxc5+ 15.Qe3 Qxe3+ 16.Kxe3> with a slightly better endgame for White.

16.Kg1 is called bad, and <16.Qf3 exf3 17.axb4 fxg2+ 18.Kxg2 Bxg4 19.Be2> suggested instead. I'm not sure if that's the case.

After 18.Rc1, the annotator calls White's situation pretty bad (<recht übel>), but White appears to have a clear advantage.

It may have been better to keep the strong ♗ with 21.Bxb4.

<22.Nb1> is given as a possibility instead of 22.Na2. The text move appears to be a mistake.

The move is not annotated, but 22...c5 may not have been too precise. 22...Qc5 looks very interesting, covering the ♙b4, pinning the ♖f2 and taking the c-file under control.

23.h3 is called best and only the mistaken <23.Bc4> discussed, but 23.Nc1 looks interesting.

Again not annotated, but worth a look is 23...Be6. It seems inferior, driving the ♘a2 where it wants to go anyway. Why not the the more restricting 23...Qe3 or 23...Qe1! (when ...Be6 is really threatening)?

On 26.Na2, the annotator claims that <26.Ne2 Bxg4!> was hopeless for White, but I don't see an advantage for Black after 26.Ne2 Bxg4 27.Nf4 c3 28.bxc3 bxc3 29.Bd3.

After 26...Qb3, White seems to panic without a reason. He could have played 27.Nc1 again.

Source: 'Wiener Schachzeitung', June 1909, pp. 172-175

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC