chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
James Franklin Campbell vs Alan Ehrlich
"As If!" (game of the day Apr-12-2017)
ICCF US10P10 (1990), ?
Modern Defense: Queen Pawn Fianchetto (A40)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more games of J F Campbell
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-29-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Old friend Tony Albano won a game thus in his student days.

How well I recall coming back from a tournament and having Tony relate the tale of his hapless opponent's conditional sequence which brought him to grief, as Black was caught out here.

May-29-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Yes! First of all, to understand the game, one has to know that it is a correspondence game. Some people may not recognize the ICCF monicker in the game header.

Secondly, non-corres players may not know that in order to save time and postage corres players sometimes include conditional moves.

These are normally along the lines of <"34.Rg5xg7+. IF 34...Kxg7 then 35.Qh4-g5+"> (Note that top-class corres players might use Uedemann code to communicate).

Sometimes they go right out on a limb and use the word "ANY". This means that one player is reckless as to what his opponent plays.

Eg: "1.e4 c6 [ANY] 2...d5."
Black saves $0.02 postage and hurries the game along.

In J Campbell vs A Ehrlich, 1990 Mr Ehrlich, evidently a dyed-in-the-wool Modern Defence exponent, received his opponent's first move. "1.e2-e4".

(In Uedemann code this is <"1st row - Sl.1, k. to end. 2nd row - Sl.1, * p.2, k.2. Rep. from * finishing k.1.">)

Now black drops his nickel-saving bombshell. He writes back. "1...g6. 2. [ANY] ...Bf8-g7."

He was expecting, of course, a standard move such as 2.d2-d4.

When he opened the next letter he found that he had save himself nearly a buck and a half.

A funny episode. It shows why intelligent people and correspondence chess are soon far apart.

Dec-11-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: I've also heard of this happening on the other side of the board:

1.e4 b6 [2.Any, 2...Bb7]
2.Ba6 Bb7
3.Bxb7
1-0

Dec-11-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: 1...Nf6 against 1.any (1...d5 also works). Of course, it's better if white doesn't play 1.e4, but it's still playable.
Dec-11-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Penguincw> That's different, no? 1...Nf6 actually is playable against any White 1st move, as long as Black is willing to play Alekhine's or an Indian System. A few other first Black moves also can be played against anything: 1...e6 (which I used to play regardless of White's 1st), 1...d6, 1...g6, 1...d5, 1...c6, 1...b6, 1...Nc6, and maybe a couple more like 1...c5 and 1...a6. The real problem only arises with a conditional on the 2nd move, as here, when Black may be asking for trouble.
Jan-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Mr Ehrlich's Tragic Bullet.>
Apr-12-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: One of the shortest games ever...and it was a correspondence game. THAT is post-modernism.
Apr-12-17  Doniez: The "if" move made a grin appear on my face but had not the same effect for Black player, "if" I understand the way he intended his smart move
Apr-12-17  green ink: A similar correspondence chess failure from the 80's: 1. d4 f5 [2. ANY e6] 2. Bg5 e6 3. Bxd8 1-0
Apr-12-17  Ratt Boy: This would be a great April 1 GOTD Game.
Apr-12-17  sfm: I'd rather lose 10 games than having a proven record of being unsportsmanlike by taking a win this way. There's no excuse in 'the heat of the moment', this is a correspondence games. James Franklin Campbell, cheap fellow.

Chess is to be won on the board. Usage of technicalities elsewhere is to be avoided.

Apr-12-17  clement41: <offramp> in your may 29, 14 kibitz you stated that black was mailed 1 e2-e4. But it was 1 d2-d4 and that makes a world of difference because 2 Bh6 is impossible after 1 e4.
Apr-12-17  catlover: <offramp> Thanks for your 2014 explanation of correspondence chess. Without that background information, this game doesn't make much sense.
Apr-12-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  mjmorri: <sfm> Why is it unsportsmanlike? Black should have been more careful or entirely avoided the IF move scenario.

I remember playing on-line with an opponent who always instantly replied 3.Bb5 to my 2...Nc6 initialing a Roy Lopez. I became annoyed with this, and one game played 2...a6 and sure enough his Bishop instantly appeared on b5, and I snapped it off. We continued playing many more games, but he never again played "Blindly".

Apr-12-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  scutigera: <sfm>: I'm with <MJMorri>; it may be unchivalrous, but it's hardly unsportsmanlike and really quite a good joke and valuable lesson. Perhaps the best way to reconcile sportsmanship and humor would have been "2 h6 Bg7 3 Bxa7, and, if Black resigns, then 1 e4, and if then '1 .. g6, 2 any except Ba6 because I've learned my lesson, 2 .. Bg7', then..." followed by some normal move.
Apr-12-17  Gottschalk: I can not add important games to the database, but this "pearl" is part of it. Arrgh!
Apr-12-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I think it was really bad form by White, and definitely unsporting.
Apr-12-17  Howard: Alex Dunne mentioned this "game" in a column of his many, many years ago. I'm assuming it's the same game as is here---unless, someone else made the same careless "if" move!

Incidentally, I agree that it's hardly "unsporting" to take advantage of someone's slip-of-the-pen. If someone sends such an "if" move, he's takin' his chances. If he gets burned as a result, that's just part of the risk of sending such an "if" move.

Geez, I can still remember several cases in my correspondence play where I lost a game because I had the wrong position set up on my board, or something of that nature. That's just part of the bargain of correspondence chess, as I see it.

Apr-12-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <offramp> Post modernism indeed. I think that this is carrying the idea of a "Modern Defense" a bit too far.
Apr-12-17  sachman19: That is ridiculous!!!
Apr-12-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Funny, amusing, almost hysterical for its numb-skullness

But totally out of place as a "GOTD"

*****

Apr-17-17  syracrophy: Apparently, this "petite" trick may be as old as correspondence chess itself:

<Item #8963. Correspondence chess trick (C.N. 8942)>

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

May-07-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp:
Guess-the-Move Final Score:
Campbell v Ehrlich 1990.
YOU ARE PLAYING THE ROLE OF CAMPBELL.
Your score: 65 (par = 47) <Par is now 48>.

Daily puzzles, news, and more!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
The origin of tragedy: The pre-move on the correspondence era
from Chess stories for History by syracrophy
The Correspondence Immortal
from Super-brevities by FSR
Clue #5
from Holiday Present Hunt Solutions: 2014 by Penguincw
April 12: As If
from Game of the Day 2017 by Phony Benoni


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC