chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Daniel Naroditsky vs Hikaru Nakamura
"Imagine Dragons" (game of the day Jun-12-2016)
US Championship (2015), St Louis, MO USA, rd 5, Apr-05
Sicilian Defense: Dragon. Yugoslav Attack Soltis Variation (B79)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more D Naroditsky/Nakamura games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-06-15  belgradegambit: Sometimes the exchange sac is to open up an attack a la Karjakin vs Carlsen, 2014. Or one can sacrifice a SECOND exchange to enter a favorable queenless ending Karjakin vs Radjabov, 2008. My first opening book was D.N.L. Levy's "The Sicilian Dragon". Like <diasterion> I also recommend Dearing's "Play the Sicilian Dragon". Anyway in this game white's queenside pawns are so weak at least one will fall quickly and the others will remain targets.
Apr-06-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: The lad has already admitted in another thread he is not Conrad Holt. Has the lad not posted when the games are being played.

I think you will find playing an OTB game whilst having access to a laptop is not allowed.

Hi Conrad (not Holt)

"All black had to do was keep exchanging until he reached a R + R vs. B + R endgame. He would have stood better, even with doubled pawns"

So here with White to play...


click for larger view

I have to assume you would play 29. Bxe5 to maintain being the exchange up and win the ending....

Have a good look at the diagram before you reply. I'm not trying to make a fool of you.

Just a wee reminder that before the won ending you have to go though a messy middlegame against one of the best OTB problem setters in the game. (2nd only to Carslen, his problems are more subtle, Nak's are right in your face.)

Smashing OTB game by Nakamura and very typical of him.

----

You don't need any books on how to play The Dragon, it's easy.

Open the c-file, fianchetto the KB and sac the exchange on c3. Preferably you sac the King's Rook so your King has f8 to run to whilst White is doing his thing on the Kingside.

Apr-07-15  bobthebob: <The lad has already admitted in another thread he is not Conrad Holt.>

That person is still pretending that he is Holt.

Here, in the main thread for the championship.

<Conrad93: <Congrats Conrad on your first win of the tournament. Since you are a regular poster here, I'm rooting for you to be at least in the top 5. :-)>

Thanks for the support.>

Completely inappropriate, especially given his other comments about a pudgy Kamsky, etc. Doesn't make Holt look good to have a pretender like this.

Apr-07-15  Conrad93: <Even Nakamura himself said the rook sacrifice was a desperate tactic.> Oh, look, you are making things up again. He NEVER said that.

He said in the interview about that sac "I decided to be practical and sac the exchange". Hmmm, doesn't sound like saying "It was a desperate tactic" and added that "over the board is it hard to find the right plan" (e.g. for the opponent).

But to make you feel better Conrad, he did add that he moved his pawn backward from G4-G3. LOL.>

Did you not watch the interview?
At no time did Nakamura claim it's part of theory.

I am aware of the Rxc3 sacrifice, but it does not happen in this position.

Nakamura said he did not deserve to be congratulated, because he played the opening badly.

The rook sacrifice was a desperado move.

Apr-07-15  Conrad93: I never claimed to be Conrad Holt.

I made a freaking joke, and you people took it way too literally.

Apr-07-15  Conrad93: < The lad has already admitted in another thread he is not Conrad Holt. Has the lad not posted when the games are being played. I think you will find playing an OTB game whilst having access to a laptop is not allowed.

Hi Conrad (not Holt)

"All black had to do was keep exchanging until he reached a R + R vs. B + R endgame. He would have stood better, even with doubled pawns"

So here with White to play...

click for larger view
I have to assume you would play 29. Bxe5 to maintain being the exchange up and win the ending....

Have a good look at the diagram before you reply. I'm not trying to make a fool of you.

Just a wee reminder that before the won ending you have to go though a messy middlegame against one of the best OTB problem setters in the game. (2nd only to Carslen, his problems are more subtle, Nak's are right in your face.)

Smashing OTB game by Nakamura and very typical of him.

----

You don't need any books on how to play The Dragon, it's easy.

Open the c-file, fianchetto the KB and sac the exchange on c3. Preferably you sac the King's Rook so your King has f8 to run to whilst White is doing his thing on the Kingside.>

Again...

THE SACRIFICE IS IS DUBIOUS IN THIS SPECIFIC GAME.

Watch the freaking interview, you freaking morons...

Apr-07-15  disasterion: <Sally Simpson: You don't need any books on how to play The Dragon, it's easy.

Open the c-file, fianchetto the KB and sac the exchange on c3.>

That's excellent. I like it.

I guess the Dragon appeals to me not just for the chaotic positions that can emerge, but because the basic themes are clear and easy to absorb. There's yards of theory - it seems inexhaustible - but the same ideas crop up again and again.

I'd still recommend Ward's and Dearing's books; both fun to read, with an evangelical enthusiasm for the opening that's infectious.

Apr-07-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: I video annotated this game here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ET...

Cheers, K

Apr-07-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Conrad,

"Watch the freaking interview, you freaking morons."

Rarely watch them, what you get is two tired men, one depressed the other releived being asked banal questions by some experienced player who knows how they feel and what they are going though. Under such circumstances you are hardly going to get the quote of the century.

If you need an interview to tell why Nak played Rxc3 and an engine to find out why Naroditsky sacced back the exchange on move 29 then I'd refrain from jumping all over GM games of this nature. You don't have a clue what happened

It's your comments that are the only 'dubious' .thing on this page.

"All black had to do was keep exchanging until he reached a R + R vs. B + R endgame."

Actually it was WHITE who was the exchange up with doubled pawns (I let it pass first time around as I tend not to make merry of a typo - or did you have the board around the wrong way.- but the uncalled for 'freaking morons'...well I just had to nit-pit.)

Hi disasterion:,

I thought Eddie's first book on the Dragon was just a quagmire of variations with very little prose. The 2nd one looks much better.

I don't have it. I have Miles 1980's book on the Dragon. You see every tactical trick in action and loads of good fun 'I must play through another' games.

Also Freddy Reinfeld's 'How to Think Ahead in Chess' one of the first (if not the first) Rep book. Got put onto that by a good player when I was starting out. Never bothered with the Stonewall or the Laker's Defence but the Dragon and what to look for....that went into the weapons lcker..

Anti - Dragon.

Well there is always 4.Qxd4


click for larger view

or 6.Nd5!?

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Nd5


click for larger view

Scored OK OTB in the 80's and 90's with this. No losses, a few draws, some better player on the day wins and a couple of under 10 move mates.

If they take e-pawn then Bb5+ and Qe2. and I've mated a few OTB (two in serious games!) and quite a few more in blitz with the Nf6. v the pinned e7 pawn pattern.

The basic trap being....

6.... Nxe4 7. Bb5+ Bd7 8. Qe2 Nc5 9. Nf6.


click for larger view

Apr-07-15  disasterion: Hi <Sally>.

Fair comment about Dearing's book (I wasn't aware he'd done a follow up). I haven't worked through much of the mass of variations, but the introductory chapter is very good: the thematic ideas clearly laid out, and some entertaining games to illustrate. I'll seek out Miles's book - that sounds great.

Very much like your 6.Nd5 anti-dragon idea - thank you. I may just have to steal it...

Apr-07-15  bobthebob: <Did you not watch the interview? At no time did Nakamura claim it's part of theory.>

Yes, I saw the interview, and I re-watched it and gave you the exact quotes.

1. I never said anything about him saying it was or wasn't theory.

2. You lied when you said "Even Nakamura himself said the rook sacrifice was a desperate tactic."

Apr-07-15  Conrad93: It was desperate, since he stood worse.

Apparently you are either deaf or dumb, because this is what Nakamura claimed after the game.

If he thought the sacrifice was sound and as excellent as you claim he would have been ecstatic after the game; but he said he did not deserve praise, and seem relieved rather than excited.

Check the database. See how many games with that exact position have a rook sacrifice.

I found at most 5 games.

Apr-09-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <Hikaru Nakamura unleashes the Dragon> GM Jan Gustafsson takes a look this game: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5mE...
Apr-09-15  belgradegambit: <Conrad93> Jan Gustafsson did not think it was desparate at all and saw no easy refutation. I believe he may be higher rated than you. See his video posted by <whiteshark>.
Apr-09-15  Conrad93: <Jan Gustafsson did not think it was desparate at all and saw no easy refutation. I believe he may be higher rated than you. See his video posted by <whiteshark>.>

Yes, that's why Nakamura, a far stronger player, was adamant about giving praise to the sacrifice...

Did you check the database? If it's as good as you claim, it would have been played far more often in the past.

Apr-09-15  Conrad93: Of course, I agree, the move is almost impossible to refute over the board, but to say it's not risky is just asinine.
Apr-09-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: < kingscrusher: I video annotated this game here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ET...

Cheers, K>

I enjoyed it quit a bit, thank you!

Apr-17-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: The game is also annotated at http://thechessworld.com/learn/anno.... An embarrassing loss for the young <Chess Life> endgame columnist.
Apr-17-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: As for 6.Nd5, see Opening Explorer.
May-27-15  Cactusjuice: Really sharp game
May-30-15  1d410: Conrad is clearly not a gm as he claims
Feb-08-16  Albanius: 29 Bxe5 loses the exchange to ..Bh6.
28 e5 was therefore an error, maybe the losing move.

Bg5 is a main line
The normal reply is ..Rc5, protecting the Q on a5 against the positional threat

15 Bxf6 Bxf6
16 Nd5 Qxd2
17 Nxf6+
14.. Rxc3 was an innovation, a positional sac of a whole exchange. Usually B gets a P for the exchange along with better P structure, or else gets mating chances against the busted up W K position. In this game, B got a position that was possible to improve, while W didn't have much to do other than try to trade down to the endgame.

Jun-12-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: I don't know about <Conrad93>, but Bruce Lee would have liked this game.
Jun-12-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Whats the pun?
Jun-13-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: This dragon leads to mate! White gets fired!
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Favorite 2015 games
by Severin
Sicilian Dragon
by ALL
Art on the board
by 5nizza
Sicilian Dragon
by ISeth
98_B75-B79_Sicilian Dragon - Yugoslav Attack
by whiteshark
June 12: "Imagine Dragons
from Game of the Day 2016 by Phony Benoni
Novelty, 11... Qa5!?; Rxc3 Sicilian Sacrifice
from Memento by Jaredfchess
scallahan4's favorite Dragon games
by scallahan4
6/12
from Games of the day for 2016. by truepacifism
Sicillian Defense
by Zhbugnoimt
Here be dragons
by disasterion
Novelty, 11... Qa5!?; Rxc3 Sicilian Sacrifice
from Memento by DrDrej
Sicilian Dragon
by Patca63
Sicillian Defense
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Epic crush!
from Instant Repertoire-6 by FLAWLESSWIN64
6/12
from Games of the day for 2016. by Jaredfchess
SY Robertson doesn't play around Fredthebear
by fredthebear


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC