chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Magnus Carlsen vs Maxime Vachier-Lagrave
"Ensnared" (game of the day Oct-02-2016)
Gashimov Memorial (2015), Shamkir AZE, rd 5, Apr-21
King's Indian Attack: Spassky Variation (A05)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 6 times; par: 99 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 39 more Carlsen/M Vachier-Lagrave games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 10 OF 10 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <keypusher: Don't apologize. That's not nearly as offensive as your annotations.>

If you want to call <u>'s drivel such.

<I guess 3....cxd4 in the Sicilian gains a permanent advantage for Black too? Since he's trading a c-pawn for a d-pawn?>

This recalls Larsen's tongue-in-cheek comment in his CL&R annotations to a win as White--might have been vs Kavalek--from the 1970s in an open Sicilian in which he noted that, despite his misgivings, he had somehow scored well overall when playing against them.

Apr-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: <I guess 3....cxd4 in the Sicilian gains a permanent advantage for Black too? Since he's trading a c-pawn for a d-pawn?>

This recalls Larsen's tongue-in-cheek comment in his CL&R annotations to a win as White--might have been vs Kavalek--from the 1970s in an open Sicilian in which he noted that, despite his misgivings, he had somehow scored well overall when playing against them.>

some professionals claim that the sicilian (3-cxd4!)is the reason,or one of;why 1.d4 scores better than 1.e4

Apr-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Incidentally, the position after 5.c4 has come up 27 times in the database and Black hasn't played ...bxc4 even once.

Opening Explorer

Maybe he's a misunderstood genius. Or maybe, just maybe, Ulhumbrus doesn't know what the @#$% he's talking about.

Apr-23-15  haydn20: A plausible line after 5...bxc4 is 5 Nxc4 Bd5 7 Ne3 e6 8 Nxd5 exd5 9. Nd4 and I love my position: beautiful pieces and pawns, Qb3 and at least a +1 initiative. The concrete variation always defeats the general precept. U seems to forget this as he presents ye olde chess wisdome (or dogma). On the other hand one doesn't flaunt these old rules without something concrete in mind.
Apr-23-15  haydn20: IMHO Black looks fine after 10...Nc5. Sure he's moved the a pawn twice, etc., but White's Reti is slow, so no harm done.
Apr-23-15  MindCtrol9: In less than 10 moves, Carlsen was clearly winning this game the way I see in the positions sence.I realized Carlsen plays very positional, and when you have the pieces well placed, it is not that difficult for a .GM like he is to keep the advantage up to the end of the game.Carlsen has confidence and that makes him a really strong player.I have been studying many G Ms how they play, and many of them fall in the aperture like in this game Lagrave did, at least in this game not saying all to make that clear.
Apr-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <haydn20: IMHO Black looks fine after 10...Nc5. Sure he's moved the a pawn twice, etc., but White's Reti is slow, so no harm done.>

I think Black's position is pretty bad after 13 moves. Neither black bishop is well placed, White has a strong and very difficult-to-challenge center, and it's hard to see where Black's play is going to come from.

So where did he go wrong? 12....e5 doesn't look so good, but 12....d6 doesn't look much better.

Stockfish on chessbomb liked 11....Nfe4, with a continuation that looked sort of similar to the game but with a pair of knights traded off, which would have helped Black.

It seems to me White had some edge after 9.d5! (9....ed 10.Nh4) and 10.Nfd4!. Probably Black should have played ...c5 on move six or seven.

Apr-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: What if Black doesn't play 24....c6 and just sits there? How does White make progress?
Apr-25-15  MarkBuckley: keypusher: What if Black doesn't play 24....c6 and just sits there? How does White make progress?

A g-pawn advance looks promising: Kh2/Rg1/g4-5. Black appears tied up.

Apr-27-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: <MarkBuckley> Precisely. 24...c6 can perhaps even be considered a losing move, but it is hard to find an active defense for Black. The plan you mention for White, Kh2, Rooks on the g-file and the advance of the g-Pawn, looks crushing. What to do? Is Black already lost?
May-05-15  1d410: I'm not saying the open Sicilian is decisive for black, if there are any misunderstandings. Just that central pawn superiority can be a lasting advantage. One of many Sicilian players consider.
May-05-15  1d410: Funny game!
May-05-15  1d410: btw who cares what Larsen thinks? lol
May-08-15  Blind Pigs: Carlsen, to me, seems like the re-incarnation of Capablanca, but with 21st Century precision.
May-08-15  Blind Pigs: I also think the true statistical test of a player's dominance, even more than elo, is winning percentage. How does the player stack up against his contemporaries? Capa and Fischer were head and shoulders above their peers in this regard, even more so than anyone since.
May-08-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Blind Pigs: I also think the true statistical test of a player's dominance, even more than elo, is winning percentage. How does the player stack up against his contemporaries? Capa and Fischer were head and shoulders above their peers in this regard, even more so than anyone since.>

That makes no sense. Winning percentage ignores strength of opposition. Elo takes into account both winning percentage and strength of opposition. Therefore, Elo is a superior measure of a player's dominance.

May-08-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Blind Pigs> If you're talking about cross-generational comparisons, though, neither winning percentage nor Elo is particularly valid.
Jul-22-15  dunamisvpm: Superb calculation by the "Magnus Force," he's a risk taker. Notwithstanding the scramble for the second time control. Have fun chess fans! GOD bless
Sep-26-15  Tal1949: My natural thought is that Carlsen was making things hard for himself with the bishop blocking the rook. Suddenly the black king goes sideways and Bang! Awesome game by 21st century Capa.
Oct-02-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: In the final position Black cannot avoid a Goodanarchist mate. (Q.v.)
Oct-02-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: For example 54...a1=Q 55.Rf7+ Kg5 56.Rg5#

54...Rh1+ 55.Kg4! w/ Rf7# to follow

Oct-02-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: That's the fella! In both senses.
Oct-02-16  Taulmaril: Just at a glance could Maxime not have drawn this game? I assume the idea after a1=Q is kg4 threatening rf7# but after rc7 rxc7 qa7 rxa7 it's a stalemate.
Oct-02-16  Taulmaril: Oh, nevermind, I see it now. Rf7+ and rf5#
Oct-03-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: White's pieces encircle the black king.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 10)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 10 OF 10 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
King Carlsen
by Zhbugnoimt
Cainechess' favorite games
by Cainechess
umyamin's favorite games
by umyamin
largecollection3
by 1d410
pawn to H5 - wonderful
from descobar3812's favorite games by descobar3812
arnoldofbattersea's favorite games
by arnoldofbattersea
Favorite Games
by Severin
Aprendizaje
by uhialfil
Saniyat24's favorite games
by Saniyat24
Hansen _ How to Win Better Positions
by stevehrop
carlsen games
by nadvil
JoseTigranTalFischer's favorite games
by JoseTigranTalFischer
what
from Favorite 2015 games by Severin
studiare scacchi con Magnus Carlsen
by mariofrisini
Magnus Carlsen
by akatombo
Switch-back
from chess strategems x - under construction by gauer
Brilliant Carlsen game
from Morten's favorite games 2 by Morten
15. Bh6!
from 71_My_Alekhines_Block by whiteshark
Finest Games of 2015
by Perdus
Magnus plays, 4. Na3!?
from Memento by DrDrej
plus 25 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC