chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Magnus Carlsen vs Stefan Randjelovic
NOR Championship Group Miniputt (1999), Gausdal NOR, rd 1, Jul-03
Englund Gambit Complex: General (A40)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Carlsen/S Randjelovic games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-24-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Carlsen's very first tournament game.
May-24-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <Tabanus> Where on earth do you get this information?
May-24-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: <alexmagnus> By years of collecting, is all I can say :)
May-24-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: For a game between two near-beginners, quite a rare mate position.
May-24-16  Appaz: Great contribution, <Tabanus>!

Carlsen was 8 years old (4 months before his 9th birthday I guess) when playing this game, which means it was right after he started getting interested in chess for real. As we know, he learned the game a few years earlier.

The quality of the game should give hope for most kids with ambitions of becoming a great player :)

May-24-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: <Appaz> I can also say that the games were collected during 2004-2010. In 2004 (when I realized Magnus' games were collectable), many games were still available at http://www.bergensjakk.no/. But now, though the reports are there, the links are mostly dead, and the games are gone.
May-24-16  Appaz: If I read your post right and you missed some of them: have you tried to contact Eirik T. Gullaksen?

A complete collection of all of Magnus' tournament games would certainly be of historical interest.

May-24-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: <Appaz> I've tried everything, incl. phoning and mailing to clubs and players. :) There are only about 8 games missing with normal time control. So it's almost complete. I'll post later exactly which games are missing (till 2010, excl. rapid and blitz).
May-24-16  Appaz: I still have all my tournament games from 30+ years ago, so maybe going as close to the source as possible: Papa Carlsen, please help us! :)
Oct-02-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: the Englund used to be a bit of a weakness for the World Champion. Carlsen vs Jan Henrik Ytteborg, 2000

I doubt that anyone will ever try it again.

Oct-02-16  Christoforus Polacco: 7. ... Q:e5 is enough.
Oct-02-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Missing Magnus games, reposted here:

Of his games with normal thinking time, I know of nine games who are missing (there may be a few more missing club games). These are:

Skei Grand Prix Group B (Gausdal), 30 July - 1 August 1999:

1) <Unknown player 0> (not hman, Odd Hansen or Linda Hensen)

Arnold Grand Prix (Gausdal), 10-14 January 2000:

2) <Santa Rause 1> (not asked)

3) <Anders Bekker-Jensen 1> (ABJ does not have the game)

NTG Grand Prix Group B, 4-6 February 2000:

4) <Oddbjrn Christensen (NOR 992) - Carlsen -> (OC does not have it)

ASKO Pinse Tournament Group B, 10-12 June 2000:

5) <Carlsen (904) - Jo Vederhus (NOR 1304) 1-0> (Vederhus' does not have it)

Asker SK Club Tournament Group A (4), 2 (?) October 2000:

6) <Carlsen (1323) - Vegard Hole (NOR 1442) 1-0> (Hole does not have it)

Asker SK Club Tournament Group A (6), 23 (?) October 2000:

7) <Carlsen (1323) - Neil Benn (NOR 1574) 1-0> (Benn: probably lost to the annuls of history)

Norwegian Individual Championships Group Junior (Kristiansund), 8-14 July 2001:

8) <Carlsen (2084) - Torill Skytte (NOR 1661) 0-1> (TS does not have the game)

9) <Carlsen (2084) - Lars Gunnesdal (NOR 1889) -> (LG does not have it)

The last two games are probably still in the archives of the Kristiansund chess club. The rest may be hard to find.

Oct-10-17  scholes: Carlsen played like 8 year old.
Oct-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: But a year later against the same opponent he played way better than one would expect of a 9-year-old
Sep-14-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Messiah: I simply LOVE how Carlsen kept playing after emerging a full rook down following this mutual opening catastrophe. Excellent fun!

1. d4 e5

<Kids, do not try this at home: the Englund is unsound.>

2. dxe5 Nc6 3. Bf4 f6

<Elsner vs E J Diemer, 1987 saw 3...g5.>

4. exf6

<A tiny bit greedy, developing with 4. Nf3 is better. 4...g5 5. Bg3 g4 6. Nd4 fxe5 7. Nxc6 bxc6 8. h3 is a possible continuation.>

4...Qxf6

<4...Nxf6 makes more sense, as it develops. White is objectively better, Black's opening is a full-blast disaster.>

5. Qd2??!?

<Nonsense. Either 5. Qc1 or 5. e3 are better. The first one will not lose a pawn, the second one helps the much-needed development. Maybe even 5. g3 can be thought of.>

5...Qxb2 6. Qe3+ Nge7??

<6...Be7, certainly, with the idea of putting it on f6.>

7. Be5?? Qxc2??

<Why? Just why? The bishop can be taken.>

8. Bxc7 Nb4?!

<A weird move. Maybe something like 8...d5 is better, developing while White struggles with the total lack of coordination.>

9. Nc3 Na6?

<9...Qb2 10. Rc1 Nxa2 11. Nxa2 Qxa2 with a later b6 is straightforward and obvious, where Black is not worse at all.>

10. Rc1 Qb2 11. Qe5??

<I watched the position after 11. Rb1 for a while, and could not decide if White is simply better or much better. So I asked the electronic monster to crunch it for a couple of hours. At depth 55 it goes for 11...Qc2 12. Bf4 h6 13. Nf3 Qg6 14. g3 Qe6 15. Qd2 Ng6 16. Nd4 Qf7 17. Bg2 Nxf4 18. gxf4 Bb4 19. Rxb4! Nxb4 20. Ncb5, and Black's underdevelopment is very bad, but not 100% lost yet. DISCLAIMER: trusting an engine output without any need of criticism is a very bad habit. Maybe 11. Bd6 or 11. Bf4 are also playable.>

11...Qxc1+

<:D>

12. Nd1 Nxc7 13. e4 Kd8 14. Nf3 Ng6 15. Qg5+ Qxg5 16. Nxg5 Bb4+ 17. Ke2 Nf4+

<Exploiting the king's horrific position with 17...Re8 is precise. Black is winning, anyways.>

18. Kf3 Rf8 19. Nxh7 Nfd5+

<Simplifying to a won late-middlegame, by sacrificing the exchange. Clever decision by Randjelovic!>

20. Nxf8 Bxf8 21. exd5 Nxd5 22. Bc4 Nb6 23. Bb5

<To be honest, I cannot see the reason of this move. White's position is already resignable, and neither d7 is weak, nor the bishop pins or X-rays anything there.>

23...a6 24. Bd3 Nd5 25. Re1 Nb4 26. Bg6 Kc7 27. Re5 Bd6

<Simply take that forgotten pawn on a2, and it is curtains.>

28. Re4

<28. Re2 will not save the game, as Black can develop that ugly bishop and rook without much interference.>

28...Nxa2 29. Ne3 Bxh2

<29...b5 is the most obvious and straightforward, of course.>

30. Rc4+

<30. Ra4 b5! 31. Rxa2 Bb7+ and 30. Bf7 b5! 31. Bxa2 Bb7 32. Nd5+ Kd6 33. Rd4 Re8 both look clever, but they are equally winning for Black.>

30...Kb8 31. Nd5

<I tried to make 31. g3-ideas work, without success. White is much worse.>

31...b5 32. Rc5

<The absolutely very last hope for some play is 32. Rxc8+ Kxc8 33. Bb1. Black is still winning by a wide margin, but there is a minimal chance that in time trouble the full point will somehow get blundered away.>

32...Bb7 33. Bf5 Bd6 34. Rc2 Bxd5+ 35. Be4 Bxe4+ 36. Kxe4 Nb4 37. Rd2 Be7 38. Rxd7

<Snatching a pawn!>

38...Bc5 39. Rxg7

<Snatching a pawn!>

39...a5 40. Rg5 Be7 41. Rxb5+

<Snatching a pawn! Giving a check!>

41...Kc8 42. Re5 Ra7 43. Rh5 a4 44. Rh1 a3 45. Ra1 Nc2 46. Ra2 Ra4+ 47. Kd3 Nb4+ 48. Kc3 Nxa2+ 49. Kb3 Rf4

<Quicker is 49...Nb4, but White is dead lost anyways.>

50. Kxa2 Rxf2+ 51. Ka1 Rxg2 52. Kb1 a2+ 53. Ka1 Bf6#

<Ouch! :)>

0-1

Sep-14-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: < I simply LOVE how Carlsen kept playing after emerging a full rook down>

This could be a false memory, but wasn't there a Tal game where he played on a piece down (it may even have been a rook) as if nothing had happened? In his case, he even won.

Sep-14-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <This could be a false memory, but wasn't there a Tal game where he played on a piece down (it may even have been a rook) as if nothing had happened? In his case, he even won.>

Upon reflection, this could refer to many Tal games - what I mean is, he lost a piece, he didn't sacrifice it.

Sep-14-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Messiah: <MissScarlett> Somehow I remember (a very-very foggy memory) that Morphy or Capablanca is our player. There was an endgame where the superstar told it is mate in 6 (or something). Then a piece, maybe a rook, was striken down incidentally by a bystander, and now it was mate in 7 (or something).
Sep-14-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Messiah: Another story is about Lk. Somewhere around the early 2000s he simply blundered a pawn in a complicated middlegame. Then he thought 'okay it should be transformed into a pawn sacrifice', and in the resulting chaos he won eventually.

(it was probably against Dreev or Bologan, I don't remember)

Sep-14-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: There is this famous Spassky piece-down game Averbakh vs Spassky, 1956, but I'm not sure about the other ones mentioned.
Sep-14-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <Somehow I remember (a very-very foggy memory) that Morphy or Capablanca is our player>

There's the famous game Saemisch vs Capablanca, 1929 but that definitely isn't the one I have in mind.

Sep-14-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Messiah> <MissScarlett>

There's Marshall's <I shan't need the rook> game, is that what you're thinking of?

J Esser vs Marshall, 1911

I'm not familiar with the Tal game, but it certainly sounds in character. Of course there's this recent example of Carlsen rallying to win after blundering a piece.

Carlsen vs G Jones, 2018

Sep-14-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: I sense a game collection coming on: <Rooks? We ain't got no rooks. We don't need no rooks. I don't have to show you any stinkin' rooks!>
Sep-18-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: < MissScarlett: <This could be a false memory, but wasn't there a Tal game where he played on a piece down (it may even have been a rook) as if nothing had happened? In his case, he even won.> Upon reflection, this could refer to many Tal games - what I mean is, he lost a piece, he didn't sacrifice it.>

This is the first annotated game in Tal's autobiography.

Tal vs J I Zilber, 1949

On move 12, Tal makes an unsound (but deliberate) piece sacrifice. After 12....Qf4+ 13.Kb1 gxf6, Tal wrote <Black has an extra bishop, for which I now do not see any compensation....White continues as if nothing has happened.>

Could that be what you're thinking of?

Sep-18-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

It could be this one. (there are so many to choose from!)

Smyslov vs Tal, 1959

Tal as Black plays on from here.


click for larger view

Smyslov is so furious he loses the plot and at one point slams the clock so hard it tipped over some of the pieces. He walked into a perpetual check. An amazing save by Tal (who was also in severe time trouble) in a position many players would just resign.

***

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Magnus blunders a full rook on move 11
from Messiah's favorite games by Messiah
The slightly overburdened child
from 98_A40_Englund / Hartlaub / rev. BDG etc by whiteshark
Englund Gambit Complex: General
from MKD's Favourite Games by MKD


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC