chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Magnus Carlsen vs Sergey Karjakin
"Turkey Grinder" (game of the day Nov-25-16)
Carlsen - Karjakin World Championship (2016)  ·  Spanish Game: Berlin Defense (C65)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

explore this opening
find similar games 64 more Carlsen/Karjakin games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 53 OF 53 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-26-16  7he5haman: <Ulhumbrus: The choice of ...fxe6 becomes unprofitable because Black is deprived of what he gains in return for what he ends up having to pay.>

It has been shown, conclusively, that Black had a <forced draw> after 19...fxe6. Therefore it cannot be considered a mistake in any objective sense.

When are you finally going to admit this?

Karjakin lost because of his subsequent play, <not> because of 19...fxe6. His mistake was not playing dynamically enough.

Nov-26-16  7he5haman: You just end up looking foolish.
Nov-26-16  Captain Hindsight: Better would have been < 20. ...Nxf2 >.
Nov-26-16  lunacyfrog: <Isn't politics itself a form of collectivism?>

Not at all. Political activity guided by sound moral philosophy CAN be used to affirm that rights, values, virtue, etc. are inherent to individuals regardless of the particular racial, gender, ethnic, or other group to which they belong.

On the other hand, has collectivist ideology infested and overrun politics? Yes, pretty much everywhere in the world as far as I can tell.

Anyway, the collectivism is evil rabbit hole goes deeper than I can get into in a chess forum, but I'd be happy to discuss it further in another venue if you like.

Nov-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Caissanist,

When I joined Red Hot Pawn everyone starts with a grade of 1200. I was moving up the rating list and when about 1820 it was suddenly discovered who I was. Up until then my profile was blank.

Infact I was nearly banned from RHP for impersonating me! That's true. I even got a email from a good friend saying there was someone pretending to me on RHP...it was me!

Someone said they really liked 'Mastering Chess' a book I co-wrote with Danny Kopec.

Next post was some lad telling me I had no right even considering writing a chess book with a RHP grade of 1820! I thought it was joke, but it turned out he was serious.

Rowson says some of the best chess advice he was ever given came from a an elderly 1400 player. I have the recollection except my elderly 'coach 'Johnny Marr' never reached 2000.

http://caledonianmercury.com/2011/0...

Nov-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: <Atking> <Good point to note. If I remember my classic Black is just one step too far to draw. The same position with black Kind on d6 and white Rook on e5 will be draw.>

Yes, the position draws with the black king on d6 and the white rook on e5.

Again, after 72...b6 73 axb6+ Kxb6 74 g4 hxg4+ 75 Kxg4 Kc6 here is the position.


click for larger view

It's a table base win but white must make 3 consecutive one-only winning moves from this position with best play.

The winning move is 76 Rd3. My reading is that this move works because it keeps the king on the c file and the rook in contact with the king in case black tries checks from the back rank.


click for larger view

Per the table base, the line continues 76 ...Rd6 77 Re3 Rd4+ 78 Kg5.


click for larger view

Nov-26-16  Open Defence: < Sally Simpson: Hi Caissanist, When I joined Red Hot Pawn everyone starts with a grade of 1200. I was moving up the rating list and when about 1820 it was suddenly discovered who I was. Up until then my profile was blank.

Infact I was nearly banned from RHP for impersonating me! That's true. I even got a email from a good friend saying there was someone pretending to me on RHP...it was me!> wow!

Nov-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: <<Richard Taylor: <<harrrylime>The Boomerang: "Yeah the guy who publicised and promoted chess like NO OTHER human being and is responsible almost single handedley for bringing down an entire corrupt Soviet Commie chess empire of CHEATS .. as well as the guy iconicly famous for producing some of the most influential and beautiful chess games known to mankind ?">> You mean he stopped the Russians from playing chess? He made some allegations about collusion, not cheating. It is not clear there was any obvious collusion. But Fischer studied the Soviet players assiduously and read and studied Shakmaty. He did things for chess, yes, but after 1972 [as <Boomerang> comments] he became increasingly eccentric and reclusive and then started promoting anti-Semitism calling Kasparov "Weinberger the Jew" and so on. He also ranted on Filipino radio stations and I would say his comments were not popular with Jewish chess players.

He wasn't "scared of Karpov" as either you or <Boomerang> think, and Karpov was confidant. They both agreed the terms were not good.

It is a pity as we missed some great games, with the result being unclear. In fact there would be that mix of Fischer with Kasparov and Karpov and Korchnoi as well as other GMs...he lived to 2008 so we missed out his games except his rather dubious match with Spassky...>>

<Richard> you're a good guy and a nice poster in here but ...

RJF ofourse WAS NOT "scared" of Karpov... you know me on here by now surely ! lol Why would I say that ??!

it was tongue in cheek sarcasm from me mate.. which gotta say involve most of my posts in here ! lol

I won't get into the rest of your post coz it's not fair sidetracking from this great game above .. x

Nov-26-16  lajube: Move 48, was it a good or bad plan to try Kg2-f3-f4-g5 and overload black's defenses, maybe eventually Kxg6?
Nov-26-16  mistreaver: For me, it was very hard to understand why 56...Rhh7 was blunder, and why 56.. Nh6 was to be prefered. Consider the following positions:


click for larger view

1 b5 cxb5 2 Rxb5 Ne3! and after Nc4 Black is not worse.


click for larger view

1 b5 cxb5 2 Rxb5 And now due to rook on d3 there is no Ne3, and therefore there is Rb6 coming, and e6 will fall.


click for larger view

1 b5 cxb5 2 Rxb5 Rc8 and next is Nf5 - Ne3

For more detailed analysis, check the full blog post about game ten: http://www.chessentials.com/carlsen...

Nov-27-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  ajile: <mistreaver:>

Nice analysis. This position is extremely subtle and difficult to judge. And especially so if you are in a time control. This is why Carlsen is simply amazing in these apparently sterile positions. You think you are safe and can just shuffle pieces but NO there is DANGER if you shuffle the wrong piece to the wrong square AT A CERTAIN POINT IN THE GAME.

Nov-27-16  Alexandro: I know that winning is the most important no matter how, but the win of Karjakin was superior than Carlsen's because: it was with less moves, with the blacks and the position was an inevitable mate or promotion of a second queen! What a beautiful game was meantime Carlsen has shown talent and insistence in this game.
Nov-27-16  Ulhumbrus: < mistreaver: For me, it was very hard to understand why 56...Rhh7 was blunder, and why 56.. Nh6 was to be prefered. Consider the following positions: > If you look at the third position which you have given Black's king's rook on h8 has access to the square c8 via the back rank for the counter-attack ...Rc8. If that rook goes to h7 it can't go to the c file as its way is obstructed by the rook on e7. The rook on e7 can't go to the c file in order to make a counter-attack as it is tied to the defence of the e6 pawn, so the rook on the h file has to do it. So by playing 56...Rhh7 Black has deprived himself of the ability to play this rook to the c file for the counter-attack ...Rc8
Nov-27-16  Atking: <mistreaver> <1 b5 cxb5 2 Rxb5 Ne3! and after Nc4 Black is not worse.> Are you sure of that? GM So seems of an opposite opinion in his comments on ChessBase. The winning process might be longer but still 3.Rd3 Nc4 4.f4 then step1 Ke2&R3b3 step2 Kd4&R3b4 step3 Ra4&a6 then Black plays b6 and Nxe6 RxN Kxd5 recovers the piece with a strong passed pawn on e5.
Nov-27-16  mistreaver: <Atking>
Nope, I am not sure, but I have analyzed the position quite a bit and haven't been able to find a plan for White against passive waiting for Black. For instance, once you accomplish the ideal Rb5-Rb4-Nc5-Kd4 setup, Black can play Na3 and Nc2+.
Nov-27-16  Atking: <mistreaver> I see. Clever! Then what about the same process with the other Rook. I mean not Rb5&Rb4 but Rb3&Rb4 the threat still the same. The difference is now a5 could be taken, but then Ra3 b6 Nb3 Ka6 NxN bxN Rba4 Rc7 Rxa5+ Kb7 Ra7+ Kc8 Ra8+ Kd7 R3a7 I suppose in this line both black rooks on 7th rank and white King on d4
Nov-27-16  mistreaver: <Atking> Firstly, Black has some nice tactical solution in this position. For instance consider the following position:


click for larger view

Here there is the following sequence:
1...Nxa5 2 Ra3 b6 3 Nb3 Ka6!?
4 Ra4 Ra7!


click for larger view

And now 5 Nxa5 b5!!
And White doesn't have anything better but to bail out with 6 Nc6+ which is a draw.

Furthermore, in the diagram below, I think White doesn't manage to place both his rooks on a file.


click for larger view

1 ... Ne3! 2 Rb2 Nc4 and now if
3 R2b4 Na3! 4 Rb6 Nc4
And black should be equal

Nov-27-16  Atking: Thanks. No doubt you did a great work about the games of this World Championship <mistreaver> however I still think your conclusion is still incomplete. On my suggestion (Your first diagram but with white King on d4) 1...Nxa5 2.Ra3 b6 3.Nb3 Ka6 4.NxN bxN 5.Rba4 Rc7 6.Rxa5+ Kb7 7.Ra7+ Kc8 8.Ra8+ Kd7 9.R3a7. True your 5...Ra7 6.Kc5 Rac7+ 7.Kd6 Rge7 8.Rxa5+ Kb6 threatening mate. Black has no problem. Thus your improvement in this line 4.R4a4 Ra7 5.NxN b5 6.Nc6+ bxR but now 7.Kc5 Rad7 8.Rxa4+ Kb7 9.Ra7+ Kc8 10.Ra8+ Kb7 11.Rb8+ Kc7 12.Re8 my impression is White chance are still alive. Even on 12...d4 13.Nxd4 Rd5+ 14.Kc4 if e6 falls N+2p should be more efficient than the Rook.
Nov-27-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRp... game 10
Nov-28-16  Vladimir Zukhar: Interesting game there.
Dec-03-16  Ulhumbrus: GM Wesley So has this to say of the move 16...Ng6: <Perhaps a small inaccuracy. The knight was just fine on e7, to guard the d5 and f5 squares. In fact Black has on his agenda an active option here to try to seize the initiative: 16...d5 17 exd5 cxd5 18 Nxd5 Nxd5 19 Bxd5 Rd8 20 Be4 and now comes the pin 20...Bg4! And White has to sacrifice material to get rid of this dangerous pin>

If So is right, it suggests that at this point Karjakin played too cautiously and so passed the advantage to Carlsen. Spassky said once of Petrosian < Petrosian's tactics were too passive and too cautious and this can be dangerous against an opponent who ventures something> Something like this could have happened here.

Here is a link to the page: http://en.chessbase.com/post/newsbl...

Dec-10-16  jerseybob: <Domdaniel: Berlin d3. Sigh.> You'd prefer the boring 4.00?
Dec-10-16  N0B0DY: Of course, <N0B0DY> could have possibly predicted that.
Dec-31-16  Albion 1959: What a game! The game of Carlsen's chess playing life. With the Sword of Damocles hanging over his head - one mistake and his title has gone, he plays an endgame like this. Akin to the final game of the Lasker v Schlecter match of 1910, a superb technical achievement, masterful endgame technique under extreme pressure with the eyes of the chess world watching and scrutinising his every move:
Jan-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  visayanbraindoctor: <Albion 1959>

The Lasker vs Schlechter, 1910 game was highly tactical, with Schlecter coming out punching. He did not need to. <Bridegburner> and I made some notes to this game that you could peruse. I think its nature was quite different from this game.

Excerpt:

<It seems that both Lasker and Schlechter were not playing solid safe chess even at this point. Note Lasker's 14. Ne5 and Schlecter's 14... Nh5 practically inviting a pawn storm.>

On the other hand, this was a highly positional game from opening to ending. Carlsen ground Karjakin down with his immaculate endgame technique, something we have seen as the World Champion's most reliable and probably best weapon.

At any rate, I'm happy that Carlsen won the tie breaks in the end. He was in the same situation as Anand in his tied match with Gelfand. For the second time in chess history we could have gotten a World Champion that did so without properly beating the previous one in a classical match (had Gelfand or Karjakin prevailed in the quick game tiebreakers).

My thoughts regarding the quick game tiebreakers:

1. Ideally the Champion must have beaten the old one to be Champion.

2. I hate these FIDE quick game tie-breaks to decide the Classical Champion.

My suggestion (which I have previously posted on other pages) if the World Championship match ends in a tie:

Two additional classical games. The Challenger receives two Whites. If the match still ends in a tie, the Champion retains his Title.

This way the Challenger must beat the Champion in a classical game (not a quick game) in order to grab the Title, and in so doing win the match outright.

Now the above gives an advantage to the Champion. All he needs is a tied match, secured by drawing the two classical tiebreaker games, to retain his Title.

Giving two successive Whites at the end of the match to the Challenger gives an advantage to the Challenger.

So things even out.

We still retain the tradition of the Challenger beating the Champ to get the Title.

The Challenger gets to do it in a classical game, not a quick game.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 53)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 53 OF 53 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
rodmalone's favorite games carlsen
by rodmalone
The Ruy Lopez
by frogmanjones
10th Game of WCC
from IR 15 games by FLAWLESSWIN64
varishnakov's favorite games
by varishnakov
Magnus Carlsen
by akatombo
WCC-16 Karjakin vs Carlsen
by King Kosiso
Game 10
from Carlsen in world championships: the 2016 match by alexmagnus
The Comeback
from The Carlsen Chronicles by MoonlitKnight
November 25: Turkey Grinder
from Game of the Day 2016 by Phony Benoni
carlsen games
by nadvil


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC