chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Ruifeng Li vs Samuel Sevian
Winter Classic (2017), Saint Louis, rd 2, Mar-12
Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation (A01)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more Ruifeng Li/S Sevian games
sac: 16...Rxc4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: White just misplays the opening here. After 1.b3 d5 white can aim for a Reversed Queen's Indian, one of the classic Nimzowitsch lines. But this game gets messy and black is soon beeter.
Mar-20-17  310metaltrader: what was white doing with the piece sac?
Mar-20-17  fisayo123: It's the only move good move in the position since Rxc2 is a serious threat. White was actually winning this game if not for some blunders (24. Rd5?! 26. Qb3? 27. Bxf6??) in time trouble.
Mar-20-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <fisayo123:White was actually winning this game if not for some blunders (24. Rd5?! 26. Qb3? 27. Bxf6??) in time trouble.> This game is way beyond me. What should white have played instead of 24. Rd5? 24. R(h)f1 looks interesting, with the threat of Rxf8. The N fork on e3 doesn't look serious because white wants to play RxB anyway. Can you please comment on the other blunder(s), too?
Mar-20-17  computer chess guy: 24. Rd5 just unnecessarily puts the Rook under attack by the Knight. 24. Rd3 is winning. White will play a similar line as in the game: .. Be7 25. Bxg7 Rg8 26. Qc3 but then Black doesn't have Nxd5.
Mar-20-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: Thanks for the analysis. I guess the idea of 24. Rd5 (unless it really was a total blunder) was to get 3 linked passed pawns uncomfortably close to the exposed black king, which really would be a big threat in this position (which is no doubt why black didn't accept). After 24. Rd3, I think I'd play Qa4, which virtually forces 25. Qxa4 Nxa4 with a double attack on the bishop and on c5. What does the engine think of that?
Mar-21-17  computer chess guy: If 24. Rd3 Qa4, White plays 25. Qc3, and Black is lost. Black's best is 25. .. Nxb2 26. Qxb2:


click for larger view

but then White's Queen will get to the 7th rank (if Black moves the Knight or if Bxc5 allowing Qxg7), with mate threats.

Mar-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <computer chess guy: If 24. Rd3 Qa4, White plays 25. Qc3, and Black is lost.>

Seems a bit perfunctory to me. 25. Qc3 Bxc5 with a lot of counterplay (the Q can't invade the back rank, the N on b6 is no longer threatened and Q on a4, the N on c4 and B on c5 are all attacking pieces, and white's K is exposed. White's big threat is still 26 Qxg7, of course

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC