chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Fabiano Caruana vs Hikaru Nakamura
US Championship (2017), St Louis, MO USA, rd 2, Mar-30
Sicilian Defense: Nezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack. Fianchetto Variation (B31)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 97 more Caruana/Nakamura games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Looks drawn despite the pawn.
Mar-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Marmot PFL: The opposite color bishops rule out serious winning chances.
Mar-30-17  sudoplatov: With Bishops of Opposite Colors, the winning side needs either widely separated Passed Pawns or attacking chances. The presence of Rooks does give some chance of attack. However, White cannot swap Rooks or Bishops except under unusual circumstances (like a win in sight.) I'd guess a draw lacking more material.
Mar-30-17  Strelets: <sudoplatov> For sure. It's not hard to imagine an opposite-colored bishop ending where one side is three pawns down and can still draw thanks to an unbreakable blockade on the light or dark squares. I still appreciate that they both tried to play it out and create winning chances (however small they might have been) rather than just agreeing a draw on the 31st move though.
Mar-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Marmot PFL: This game followed well known recent games like Caruana-Eljanov from the Olympiad and Adams-Giri from Tata Steel. Caruana thought for some time on 15 Re2. The alternative was probably Qxc6, not sure what the computers would say or if either is dangerous to black.
Mar-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  SirRuthless: Qxc6 is not a move you play without prep. It's being invited and it leads to a forced draw or a better position for black after the obvious Bb7 Qd7 if white is not careful. Re2 was very clever given the recent success Caruana has had against Nak with white and the tournament situation. Nakamura saw f4 but didn't trust it or think it was worth the risk. Caruana gambled and escaped what was, considering the opponent, a weak opening performance in this the game.
Apr-01-17  Pedro Fernandez: As in the Berlin, in the Rossolino I never like exchange my powerful bishop, but, it is apparent that the theory advices this, and a lot of GMs follows such advice.
Apr-01-17  Pedro Fernandez: Better said, chess programs!
Apr-01-17  Pedro Fernandez: After 29.Rxc5, why to play more.
May-28-17  Clement Fraud: 5.O-O seems curiously passive. 5.d4 appears more appropriate to me (with the intention of of recapturing with the Queen following an exchange of pawns).
May-28-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <Domdaniel: Looks drawn despite the pawn.> You're a poet who doesn't know it.

What was with the pawn sacrifice 35...g5? Couldn't he just have played Kf6 instead?

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC