Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Sergey Karjakin vs Peter Svidler
Sinquefield Cup (2017), Saint Louis, MO USA, rd 1, Aug-02
Italian Game: Classical Variation. Giuoco Pianissimo (C53)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 62 more Karjakin/Svidler games
sac: 31.fxe4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-02-17  HeMateMe: three passed pawns add up! I wonder why So allowed that, it was a time bomb.
Aug-02-17  JimNorCal: Peter is such a likable guy, sad to see him lose. Good luck in future rounds!
Premium Chessgames Member
  docbenway: HeMateMe:"three passed pawns add up! I wonder why So allowed that, it was a time bomb." I bet he's just too polite to horn into someone else's game.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sokrates: A risky gamble by Karjakin, who put all his money on his powerful a & b pawns while his center and king side was under a huge pressure most of the game. When he managed to easen that pressure his pawn phalanx could start rolling. An interesting asymmetric battle in this game.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Troller: According to engines, Black initially went wrong with 16..exd4 (played after 24 minutes of thought). Granted, aesthetically pleasing as the position was after 16.c4, it was insanely complex.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: It is after Whte plays 16. c4

click for larger view

that the position really comes alive. Both players did well to handle the complications.

Aug-03-17  Ulhumbrus: One alternative to 16...ed is 16...c6. We can assume that Svidler had not planned to start complications which he considered disadvantageous, so he must have miscalculated something.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Some chess openings seem to go in cycles.

In the very early days, the 1700s, it was the most basic Italian Game.

Then about 1830 people started playing the Evans Gambit.

When Black started defending against that people switched to the Spanish.

But when White was winning too often, Black players switched to the Berlin Defence.

When White got bored playing that he switched to the Italian Game...

And so it goes on round and round. It'll soon be time for an Evans Revival.

Aug-03-17  Howard: The late Larry Evans once said back in the 70's that openings were "like hemlines. They go in and out of fashion".
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <offramp> True, But the 1700s and 1800s version of the Italian game, characterized by a very early d2-d4 is very different than the current version with an early d2-d3 and then d3-d4 only after proper preparation. It has more similarities to the Spanish game than it does to the "classical" Italian game.

What I'm looking forward to is a rennaisance of the Two Knight's defense after 3.Bc4 since that usually leads to exciting play. And I don't think that it has ever been refuted.

Jul-30-18  1d410: Computer annotations here are a disgrace... a bunch of garble and gibberish... Please don't let this be the future of!
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <offramp: About 1830 people started playing the Evans Gambit.

It'll soon be time for an Evans Revival.>

Definitely: there are now only about 1828 people who play the Evans Gambit and global observatories are concerned that it may be an endangered species.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Italian game 1
from Games by Csabika988
GlassCow's favorite games2
by GlassCow

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC