chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
AlphaZero (Computer) vs Stockfish (Computer)
AlphaZero - Stockfish (2017), London ENG, Dec-04
Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation. Polugayevsky Gambit (E17)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more AlphaZero/Stockfish games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-07-17  rodrigoporto: Skynet, is that you ?!
Dec-07-17  cunctatorg: Superb play from the real World Champion!!!!!!

Fick it.........

Dec-07-17  diagon: If AlphaZero learned by itself from scratch how to evaluate positions then it's equivalent to a human learning chess from knowing just how to move pieces to becoming the absolute world champion of chess in just 4 hours.
Dec-07-17  diagon: And actually not just to evaluate but also plan a game strategy.
Dec-08-17  Cheapo by the Dozen: This is the second AlphaZero game I've looked at, and in both cases AlphaZero seemed to put high value on space.
Dec-08-17  talwnbe4: 19..Ne8 instead of 19..Nb7 is the move preferred by standard stockfish. 19..Nb7 places the knights offside
Dec-09-17  Monocle: <rodrigoporto> Is it really necessary to make the same inane comment on every AlphaZero game?
Dec-09-17  JPi: <talwnbe4: 19..Ne8 instead of 19..Nb7 is the move preferred by standard stockfish. 19..Nb7 places the knights offside> I prefer 19...Ne8 too By the way what was the "idea" on 20...Qxc4? 21.BxN then 22.Qxd7 ? Black is still pawn up to compensate 7 rank pressure. I understand 2B are stronger than 2N+p but how much is this advantage?
Dec-24-17  Ulhumbrus: 11...Bf6 allows 12 Nd6.

35...f5 returns one of the pawns and 37...Rf8 returns the other

Dec-26-17  50movesaheadofyou: Black stinks in the endgame. I loved white's creep-up of the King from g1-g5. One look at the board after <52.Kg5!> and it's wicked white domination. The Rooks had the center, the King the right wing, it's the real resign point. All I saw next was a vacuum sweep of the black pawns.

Black played well but the endgame was no fight. And 16... Bc4 giving white the 2 Bishops is a strange move a human wouldn't play. I almost call it bizarre if it didn't free the Nb8. Why not 16...Bb7, frees the Knight with a healthy B on b7.

Dec-26-17  50movesaheadofyou: On 16...Bb7,

With one continuation 17.Bf4 Ne8 18.Nb5 d5 19.Be5 Qd8 20.Nd4 Nd7 and black looks ok. But unclear of course, I'm not Stockfish.

Even ...Ne8 seems ok if you don't mind being tight with +2 pawns 16...Ne8 17.Ne4 Qd8 18.Nd6 Nxd6 19.Qxd6 Qf6 20.Bf4 Bc4 21.Qxf6 gxf6 22.Bd6 Rc8 23.b3 Be6 24.Rad1 and again don't know who's better but wouldn't mind playing the blacks.

Apr-16-18  bahduggi: Pawns? You want to see my Pawns? We don't need no stinkin pawns...
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC