chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Ju Wenjun vs Tan Zhongyi
Women's World Championship (2018), Chongqing/Shanghai CHN, rd 8, May-15
Queen's Gambit Declined: General (D30)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 38 more Ju Wenjun/Tan Zhongyi games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you register a free account you will be able to create game collections and add games and notes to them. For more information on game collections, see our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-15-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Ju Wenjun missed an excellent opportunity to get a decisive advantage in the match:


click for larger view

White to move

1) +3.08 (32 ply) <27.Rxe5! Nxe5 28.f4> Ng4 29.Qxf6 Nxf6 30.Bc4+ Nd5 31.Bxd5+ cxd5 32.Nd4 b4 33.Nc6 Re8 34.Nxa7 Re7 35.Nb5 Be8 36.Nd6 Bd7 37.Rxd5 Re1+ 38.Kc2 Rh1 39.Rd2 Rf1 40.Rd4 Rf2+ 41.Kb3 Be6+ 42.Nc4 Kf7 43.c6 Ke7 44.Kxb4 Rc2 45.c7 Rxh2

2) +0.91 (31 ply) 27.f4 Rxe1 28.Qxe1 Kf8 29.Bc2 Rxd1+ 30.Qxd1 Nd8 31.Nd4 a5 32.a3 a4 33.Qd2 Ke7 34.Qd3 Nb7 35.Qc3 Nd8 36.Qd2 Kf8 37.Qe3 Kg8 38.Bd1 Nb7 39.Qc3 Bf7 40.Nxb5 Qxc3 41.Nxc3 Nxc5 42.Bc2 Ne6 43.Bxf5 Nxf4

3) +0.08 (31 ply) 27.Bc2 f4 28.Rxd8+ Qxd8 29.Bxg6 Rxe1+ 30.Qxe1 hxg6 31.Qe4 Qf6 32.Nd4 Ne5 33.h4 Kg7 34.Kc2 a5 35.b3 Kh7 36.Kd1 Kh6 37.Ne2 Nd7 38.Qxf4+ Qxf4 39.Nxf4 Nxc5 40.Ke2 g5 41.hxg5+ Kxg5 42.Ke3 Kf5 43.Ne2 Ne6 44.Nd4+ Nxd4 45.Kxd4 Kf4 46.Kc5 b4

6.0 minute analysis by Stockfish 9 v010218

May-15-18  goodevans: <whiteshark> That's true but that first line gets pretty difficult to analyse beyond 32.Nd4.

It's not obvious (to me at least) that white has an advantage here nor what the best play is for either side. I suspect Ju Wenjun saw that line and dismissed it as simplifying too much without sufficient advantage.

One for the computers, that one.

May-15-18  The17thPawn: <whiteshark> - What's the line if black captures with queen rather than knight in your first variation? 27...Qxe5
May-16-18  goodevans: <The17thPawn> 27.Rxe5 Qxe5 28.Qxe5 Nxe5 29.Bc4+ bxc4 30.Rxd8+ wins the exchange.
May-16-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  grubyilysy: Goodevans, I do not agree. Good "blocking" knight on central d4 against poor bishop, free pawn c, week pawns on Q side, it is clear advantage in ending without any calculation, at least "close to winning". Ju must have missed 30.Bc4+.
May-16-18  Vitez: This game is on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJb...
May-16-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: This one, starting with 27.Rxe5 does not shout at you 'something here.'


click for larger view

Of course all exchanges should be examined for a twist or a turn but this is an easily missed shot.

Ju Wenjun spent 53 seconds on 27.Bc2.

On move 25 (Bd3) she spent 6 minutes possibly deciding back then the Bishop was going to go to c2.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC