chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Magnus Carlsen vs Richard Rapport
Tata Steel Masters (2019), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 8, Jan-20
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen. Bastrikov Variation (B47)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Carlsen/R Rapport game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-21-19  epistle: <Titled players who post here have the right to ban any poster they wish from their player pages.>

Is this rule written somewhere, or did you just invent it?

Do you imply players' pages are owned by the players?

Jan-21-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: No, I didn't write it. It's a privilege extended to players, just like in individual forums.

For example, I was banned from the So page. No reason was given.

Jan-21-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: After sleeping on it, I've decided I over-reacted to <Sargon>. It's not an admin account after all. Apologies for jumping down your throat.
Jan-21-19  frogbert: <OCF> When the non-admin account often is used to express admin opinions and decisions, this artificial border you mention becomes *very* blurred, imnsho. ;)
Jan-21-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Yes, agree there <frogbert>
Jan-21-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: I would like to add what the Nigerians call a GWOW (General World of Warning): Never use irony online unless you are sure that the entire audience is A) clever enough and/or B) knows you well enough to get the joke AND C) is well-intentioned towards you, because your enemies will deliberately ignore the irony and take your message at face value if it's to your disadvantage.

In this case, if Sargon's statement was meant ironically, prerequisites B and C, at least, were not satisfied, so it was ill-advised saying it.

Jan-21-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Diademas: <<ChessHigherCat>: Never use irony online unless [...]>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%2...

Jan-21-19  csmath: I think Magnus is right on this one, he keeps on playing fairly consistent but sometimes he gets position that is just nice enough for him to shine. It seems after 24 moves Black is just worse no matter what. That black knight on d7 just sucks, doing nothing and going nowhere. This is a great game, and quite dominating, too bad for Rapport.
Jan-21-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <espistle>, <safuna> If you were both banned from posting to the So page, welcome to the club. Like you, no reason was given to me.

So I contacted So. He was gracious enough to read my note and, instead of ignoring it as a lesser person might have done, referred it to a member of his team to look into it. I was told that the So page's administrator was <told> by some of its frequent posters that I was anti-So because I (gasp!) dared to try to bring some objectivity to the page by posting to correct previously posted factual errors. No effort was apparently made by the page administrator to verify the accuracy of this anti-So claim.

I followed this up by providing links to various posts listing (1) the type of objective (or so I thought) posts I made and (2) posts from me praising So's performance (when warranted, although I never criticized him in any way other than in the minds of his most ardent fans) and generally expressed my overall admiration for his great accomplishments under somewhat difficult circumstances and wished him well.

The response I received was that they were too busy to click on the links and read them (really?) so they were not going to do anything about it.

Late last year a prominent member of the pro-So WSFFCI (his words, not mine) posted with regard to the Wesley So page that "This player page is meant for free sharing of opinions without censorship or intolerance, in the context of the Posting Guidelines." Yet, as of today, I am still barred from posting on the. Not that I care in the least since I have no desire or intention to ever post there, but I find the hypocrisy amusing.

Have either of you recently tried to post to the Wesley So? I would be curious to see if you were capable of doing so on the "new" player page "meant for free sharing of opinions without censorship or intolerance, in the context of the Posting Guidelines."

Jan-21-19  john barleycorn: <AylerKupp: <espistle>, <safuna> If you were both banned from posting to the So page, welcome to the club. Like you, no reason was given to me. ...>

I did not lose sleep about sharing your fate. Rather, Wesley So is not in command of his page any longer ... look at the style of his messages, recently. That page is a joke ... or rather a desaster. Go, Wesley, go. Gogo girl, Wesley.

Jan-21-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Easy. He sets the expiry date of my premium membership from the current <Jan-13-2020> to, say, <Jan-13-2060>. That should cover it; I may be tenacious of life, but I'm not greedy.
Jan-21-19  epistle: <AylerKupp: <espistle>, <safuna> If you were both banned from posting to the So page, welcome to the club. Like you, no reason was given to me. So I contacted So. He was gracious enough to read my note and, instead of ignoring it as a lesser person might have done, referred it to a member of his team to look into it. I was told that the So page's administrator was <told> by some of its frequent posters that I was anti-So because I (gasp!) dared to try to bring some objectivity to the page by posting to correct previously posted factual errors. No effort was apparently made by the page administrator to verify the accuracy of this anti-So claim.>

If you do not PRAISE him you are not objective or accurate. And if you criticise him, you are anti.

Jan-22-19  fabelhaft: Carlsen didnít think this game was anything special, but it sure wasnít much wrong he did in it. Has to be his clearly best game in Tata this year.
Jan-22-19  frogbert: <nok: I only see patriotism on one side here.>

The operating term being "here", I suppose. :) If I cared even one bit, I could've provided a few examples from the dozens available around the site, but alas - I don't and won't.

I mainly commented on tone and hypocrisy; I'm not up anyone's ass and I'm not the least offended. :) However, I'm more than a little amused by obvious shortcomings in both people and business skills. Have a good day, everyone!

Jan-22-19  ajile: A lot of thin skinned people around here. Remarks like that on gaming forums are considered normal even by admins.

As to the entertainment value of the site it appears that fights in the comment sections now beat out actual chess game play. I mean 95% of all top games now consist of the same 4-5 openings which have been analyzed to death.

So what is the future of chess? Online it is (apparently) doing great in blitz formats but how long can even this be maintained?

Jan-23-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: This, actually, was a very entertaining game.
Jan-28-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: you don't see MC light it up tactically like this so much. I guess Rapp isn't the best player, so it's a little easier to find weaknesses here than against a super GM. Keep piling in the pieces, forcing your opponent to make kingside pawn moves that lead to more weak squares. Kasparov 101.
Jan-30-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier:


click for larger view

Analysis by Houdini 4 d 24 dpa done

1. + - (1.59): 29.Rfe1 Nb6 30.Bxf6 Bf8 31.Nc3 e3 32.Be5 Qxg2+ 33.Kxg2 Rbd8 34.Rxe3 Rxd1 35.Nxd1 Rd8 36.Nc3 Rd2+ 37.Re2 Rxe2+ 38.Nxe2 Kf7 39.Kf3 Ke6 40.Ke4 g6 41.Ng1 Nd7 42.Nf3 Be7 43.Bg7 Nf6+ 44.Bxf6 Kxf6 45.Ne5 Ke6 46.Nc6 Bh4 47.Nb8 a5 48.Nc6 Be1

2. + - (1.45): 29.Rde1 Bd8 30.Rxe4 Rxe4 31.Qxe4 Nf8 32.f5 Qf7 33.Re1 Rc8 34.Kg2 Qd7 35.Re2 Qf7 36.Be1 h6 37.Bg3 Qd7 38.Bf4 a5 39.Nc3 Qd4 40.Qb7 Qd7 41.Qd5+ Qxd5+ 42.Nxd5 Kh7 43.Re8 Nd7 44.Bd6 h5 45.Kf3

Jan-30-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier:


click for larger view

Analysis by Houdini 4 d 23 dpa done

1. + / = (0.52): 23...Rfe8 24.Nd5 Bf8 25.Rde1 Bxd5 26.Qxd5 Qxd5 27.exd5 exf4 28.gxf4 Rxe1 29.Rxe1 f5 30.Kf2 Kf7 31.Bf1 g6 32.Kf3 Nf6 33.Bd3 Re8 34.Rxe8 Nxe8 35.a3 Bg7 36.b4 Bc3 37.Bc2 Ke7 38.h3 Nf6

2. + / - (0.74): 23...Qa7 24.Nd5 Bxd5 25.Qxd5 Rfe8 26.Qd3 Nf6 27.Bf3 Bf8 28.Kg2 Qe7 29.fxe5 dxe5 30.Rd2 Qe6 31.Rfd1 Rb7 32.Qe3 Rd7 33.Rxd7 Nxd7 34.g4 Nf6 35.g5 Ng4 36.Qc3 Be7

Jan-30-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier:


click for larger view

Analysis by Houdini 4 <d 24 dpa done

1. = (0.13): 15...Ne5> 16.Qd2 Nc6 17.f4 f6 18.Bh3 Kh8 19.Nc3 Qb7 20.Bg4 Nd4 21.Ne2 Nc6 22.Rf2 Kg8 23.Bf3 Qc7 24.Kg2 Kh8 25.Qe3 Bd7 26.Qd2 Be8 27.Bc3

2. + / = (0.37): 15...Bb7 16.Qc3 e5 17.Qc2 Nf6 18.Nc3 Rfe8 19.Bh3 h5 20.f4 exf4 21.Rxf4 Qa5 22.Bf5 Bc6 23.Rdf1 Rb7 24.Kg2 Bd8 25.Qd3 Bd7 26.Rd1 Bxf5 27.Rxf5 Rd7 28.h3 h4

Jan-31-19  siamesedream: Magnus confesses he actually just blundered a pawn against Richard Rapport: <"I just stumbled onto this beautiful construct by pure luck!">

<"I was just feeling so ridiculously dumb, so that was why it was kind of hard for me to feel good about the game, because even though after that it went swimmingly it was all based on a very, very basic oversight!">

https://twitter.com/chess24com/stat...

Feb-01-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<siamesedream> Magnus confesses he actually just blundered a pawn against Richard Rapport: <"I just stumbled onto this beautiful construct by pure luck!">

That's funny. In a moment of chess blindness in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vS... at about 14:50 GM Jan Gustafsson says that after 24...Rfe8, 25.e5 is not yet a threat with Rapport thinking "everything is defended in my camp", since after 25.e5 Bxg2 26.Qxg2 dxe5 "White is not actually winning material because 27.Rxd7 Qxd7 28.Qxb7 (???) Rxb7 (???) "everything is defended". But after 27...Qxd7 there is no longer a Black queen on b7 so 28.Qxb7 is not possible and 2...Rxb7 is also not possible unless White plays 28.Qb7??. It's somewhat gratifying to see that even a GM can have a rare moment of chess blindness just like me, although in my case it was never so rare.

Then Gustafsson "recovers" by saying that "But Carlsen still goes for this position" (after 25.e5) "His reasoning is not to win material here but to increase his positional domination. He's opened the d-file for his rook, the g-file is open, and now the knight joins the party and occupies the d5 square, a perfect square for the White knight, and you can see the difference in activity."

I wonder what he thought after reading Carlsen's tweet. I hope that he was able to laugh about it!

Feb-01-19  starry2013: There was actually an interview where he confesses to Gustafsson. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6X6...
Feb-04-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: <starry2013> I watched that interview and Gustaffson told Carlsen he might be too honest.
Feb-04-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <37...g5> 38. Rxe4 Rd6 39. Bxe5 Rxe5 40. Rxe5 fxe5 41. Rxg5 Bg7 42. Qh5 Qf8


click for larger view

White has some work to do. I don't know if Black can hold this a Pawn down, but he is at least breathing and still has a few thoughts of a perpetual.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Silent 31. Ne3! to allow rook lift to begin a kingside attack
from Carlsen favourites by CaradhrasAiguo
40a Bastrikov.
from Sicillian. Paulsen by PinkLedDoor
MKD's Sicilian Defense White 2
by MKD
Sicilian Taimanov / Paulsen Poked Fredthebear
by Patca63
AssassinInWhite's favorite games
by AssassinInWhite
Sicilian Taimanov / Paulsen Poked Fredthebear
by fredthebear


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC